agentleFS
OpenLinkSoftwareOpenLinkSoftware/ai-agent-skills/fuxi-engineer/SKILL.md

fuxi-engineer

Skill42 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use FuXi for various semantic web reasoning needs (RDF, RDFS, OWL, RIF, SPARQL)

  • Installs packages

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Add annotations to OWL ontologies

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Use robot to validate if an ontology is in the OWL 2 RL profile (and therefore can be used with DLP)

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Use riot to convert between RDF formats

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    When you need to interpret an OWL ontology rule file

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    When you need to answer SPARQL queries

    line 24
  6. Distinctive:

    When you need to add annotations to OWL ontology using InfixOWL API

    line 25
  7. Very specific:

    When verbalizing or serializing OWL for human eyes or reviewing narrative readability, the preferred syntax is Manchester OWL (OWL/RDF/XML):

    line 29
  8. Distinctive:

    If there is a need to query over a large RDF dataset, have decent performance, etc., then use QLever (see QLever Documentation: Quickstart) …

    line 56
  9. Distinctive:

    Use named graphs and named graph pattern matching to take advantage of the fact that RDF graphs are excellent for logical grouping of …

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    Use uv whenever possible (see https://github.com/uv-python/uv)

    line 67
  11. Very specific:

    Use --output to specify output formats (such as _'sip-collection-svg'_, for example)

    line 107
  12. Very specific:

    ASK provable → answers[0] is True.

    line 145
  13. Very specific:

    Use @pytest.mark.integration for CLI tests.

    line 277

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Use FuXi for semantic web reasoning (RDF, OWL, SPARQL)

FuXi is a Python bi-directional reasoning engine (forward/bottom-up + backward/top-down) companion to RDFLib.

What I do

  • Try steps of reasoning and generation of proofs
  • Add annotations to OWL ontologies
  • Summarizing an OWL ontology using InfixOWL API
  • Performing theorem proving services
  • Make use of QLever for SPARQL interlocution with ontologies and/or rules
  • Use robot to validate if an ontology is in the OWL 2 RL profile (and therefore can be used with DLP)
  • Use riot to convert between RDF formats

When to Use This Skill

  • When you need to interpret an OWL ontology rule file
  • When you need to answer SPARQL queries
  • When you need to add annotations to OWL ontology using InfixOWL API

Basic Principles

The best format for OWL ontologies is OWL/RDF/XML, for compatibility with ontology tools such as protege.
When verbalizing or serializing OWL for human eyes or reviewing narrative readability, the preferred syntax is Manchester OWL (OWL/RDF/XML):

from rdflib import Graph
from fuxi.cli.renderers import _render_man_owl as render_man_owl
from fuxi.Syntax.InfixOWL import all_classes, all_properties
ontology_graph = Graph().parse("ontology.owl")

for p in all_properties(ontology_graph):
    print(p.identifier, list(p.label))
    print(repr(p))
for c in all_classes(ontology_graph):
    print(c.__repr__(True))

Otherwise, turtle is the preferred format for RDF/XML if it has no rules or N3 if it does. SPARQL files should be managed in separate .rq files.

Some core RDF vocabularies to re-use whenever possible:

If there is a need to query over a large RDF dataset, have decent performance, etc., then use QLever (see QLever Documentation: Quickstart) and various examples of configuration files to see how RDF can be loaded into it and queried efficiently via its configuration file format.

Use named graphs and named graph pattern matching to take advantage of the fact that RDF graphs are excellent for logical grouping of common content in the same way that files and directories are useful for grouping content by common criteria and the naming conventions can be useful in sorting and filtering.

Installation

Use uv whenever possible (see https://github.com/uv-python/uv)

uv pip install fuxi          # or: uv pip install -e ".[dev]"

Using robot

Checking if an ontology is in the OWL 2 RL profile (or give an error otherwise):

robot validate-profile --profile RL  --input  /path/to/ontology.owl

Or that it is in OWL 2 DL:

robot validate-profile --profile DL  --input  /path/to/ontology.owl 
OWL 2 DL Profile Report: [Ontology and imports closure in profile]

CLI subcommands

CommandPurpose
fuxi.core facts.n3Forward chaining, RETE diagnostics
fuxi.proof --why='Q' facts.n3BFP query answering, proof/SIP graphs
fuxi.owl --dlp onto.ttlOWL→DLP, ontology reasoning

Common flags: --rules PATH, --output FORMAT, --ns PREFIX=URI, --why "SPARQL", --method {naive,bfp}.

Output formats: n3, nt, xml, conflict, rif, man-owl, adornment (adorned rules), pml (proof serialization), proof-graph-svg/png, rete-network-svg/png, sip-collection-svg/png.

Example of running individual OWL test as command-line:

$ fuxi.owl --method=bfp --dlp --hybrid \
           --ns eg=http://example.net/vocab# \
           --ns your=http://example.net/vocab# \
           --why "ASK { eg:bob your:isBrotherOf eg:joe }" \
           --output proof-graph-svg https://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/inverseOf/premises001

--hybrid should be used for small, given fact graphs but not large SPARQL services. Use --ns to bind prefixes. Use --output to specify output formats (such as 'sip-collection-svg', for example)

Combining RDF/XML output from fuxi with other tools

You can convert the serialization of a proof graph to PML RDF/XML to turtle using riot:

$ fuxi.proof --method=bfp --dlp --hybrid \
             --ns eg=http://example.net/vocab# \
             --ns your=http://example.net/vocab# \
             --why "ASK { eg:bob your:isBrotherOf eg:joe }" \
             --output pml test/OWL/inverseOf/premises001.rdf | \
  JENA_HOME=/opt/apache-jena JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64 PATH="$PATH:$JENA_HOME/bin" riot \
      --syntax=rdfxml \
      --output=turtle -

Programmatic API (canonical pipeline)

from rdflib import Graph, Namespace
from fuxi.Rete.RuleStore import setup_rule_store
from fuxi.cli.shared import _extract_goals, _compute_derived_predicates
from fuxi.SPARQL.utilities import owl_entailment_regime_graph, sparql_interlocution
from fuxi.DLP.DLNormalization import normal_form_reduction

fact_graph = Graph().parse("onto.ttl", format="turtle")
normal_form_reduction(fact_graph)
ns_binds = dict(fact_graph.namespaces())
_, _, network = setup_rule_store(make_network=True)
dlp = list(network.setup_description_logic_programming(
    fact_graph, add_pd_semantics=False, construct_network=False))
goals = _extract_goals("SELECT ?x WHERE { ... }", ns_binds)
derived_preds, _ = _compute_derived_predicates(goals, ns_binds)
entailing_graph, _ = owl_entailment_regime_graph(
    fact_graph, ns_binds, derived_predicates=derived_preds or None,
    goals=goals, extra_rulesets=dlp)
answers = list(sparql_interlocution(query, entailing_graph.store))
  • ASK provable → answers[0] is True; unprovable → len(answers) == 0
  • SELECT → each answer is a dict[Variable, URIRef]

TopDownSPARQLEntailingStore (direct use)

from fuxi.SPARQL.BackwardChainingStore import TopDownSPARQLEntailingStore, BFP_METHOD

store = TopDownSPARQLEntailingStore(
    fact_graph.store, fact_graph, idb=program,
    ns_bindings=ns_binds, decision_procedure=BFP_METHOD,
    derived_predicates=derived_preds,
)
for answer in sparql_interlocution(query, store):
    print(answer[Variable("x")])

SPARQLServiceGraph (remote SPARQL)

Regular (no reasoning)

from rdflib import Graph
from rdflib.plugins.stores.sparqlstore import SPARQLStore

# Define the remote endpoint URL
endpoint = "https://dbpedia.org/sparql"

# Create a graph backed by the remote SPARQL store
store = SPARQLStore(endpoint)
g = Graph(store=store)

# Run a query just like a local graph
query = """
SELECT ?label WHERE {
    <http://dbpedia.org> rdfs:label ?label .
    FILTER (lang(?label) = 'en')
}
"""

for row in g.query(query):
    print(row.label)

With reasoning (sparql_interlocution and owl_entailment_regime_graph in fuxi.SPARQL.utilities)

from fuxi.SPARQL.utilities import sparql_interlocution, owl_entailment_regime_graph
from fuxi.types import Variable, RDFTerm
from rdflib import Graph

fact_graph = Graph().parse("ontology.ttl")
hybrid_predicates = [
    #
]
rules = [
    #rules
]

#[.. snip ..]
entailing_graph, _ = owl_entailment_regime_graph(
    fact_graph,
    identify_hybrid_predicates = True,
    hybrid_predicates = hybrid_predicates,
    extra_rulesets = rules, #parsed using horn_from_n3
    add_pd_semantics = False,
    add_non_dhl_owl_rules = True,
)
for answer in sparql_interlocution(" .. sparql query ..", entailing_graph.store):
    answer: dict[Variable, RDFTerm]
    user_readable_dict = {f"?{k} -> {v.n3()}" for k, v in answer.items()}
    #Use answers in subsequent query, etc.

InfixOWL (edit/build/read ontologies)

from fuxi.Syntax.InfixOWL import GraphContext, Class, Property, AnnotationProperty
from rdflib import Graph, Namespace, Literal

g = Graph()
NS = {"ex": "http://example.org/"}
with GraphContext(g, NS):
    person = Class(NS.ex.Person, label="Person")
    has_child = Property(NS.ex.hasChild, domain=[person])
    parent = Class(NS.ex.Parent)
    parent.equivalent_class = [person & has_child.some(person)]

N3 rules from strings

from io import StringIO
from fuxi.Horn.HornRules import horn_from_n3

program = list(horn_from_n3(StringIO("""\
@prefix ex: <http://example.org/> .
{ ?s ex:parentOf ?o } => { ?s ex:relatedTo ?o } .
""")))
for rule in program:
    rule.nsMapping.update(ns_binds)

Using riot and sop to convert between RDF formats

Below is an example of using riot (assumed JENA_HOME=/opt/apache-jena and and JAVA_HOME and PATH set) and sop (assumed in ~/qlever$ sophia-cli/sop) to extract NQuad files with given graph names

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

for f in *.rdf; do
  [ -e "$f" ] || continue        # skip if no matches
  base="${f%.*}"
  nt_out="${base}.nt"
  nquad_out="${base}.nq"
  base_urn=urn:medical-data:patient-record:"$base"
  sparql_base_urn="<$base_urn>"
  echo "Converting $f -> $nt_out"
  JENA_HOME=/opt/apache-jena JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-21-openjdk-amd64 PATH="$PATH:$JENA_HOME/bin" riot \
           --base="$base_urn" --quiet --output=NTRIPLES "$f" > "$nt_out"
  echo "Converting $nt_out -> $nquad_out (in $sparql_base_urn)"
  ~/qlever$ sophia-cli/sop parse "$nt_out" ! map -g "$sparql_base_urn" ! canonicalize -o "$nquad_out"
done

You can also convert between formats more directly:

riot --output turtle /path/to/ontology.owl

Testing patterns

Use @pytest.mark.integration for CLI tests. Validate N3 output via Graph().parse(data=stdout, format="n3") and triple membership. Validate SVG via stdout.startswith(b"<?xml"). Use conftest.py fixtures simple_rules_n3, horn_ruleset, rete_network for quick in-process tests.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

Reviews can't be read right now.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.