go
Skill1 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Act on the most recent recommendation, proposal, or stated judgment in the conversation. The user is greenlighting without retyping — "go ahead with what you said." Don't ask "should I proceed?". Stop only for risky/hard-to-reverse actions or when you genuinely cannot pick without more info.
In this repository56 other files it gives its agents.
- autopilotSkill
- before-afterSkill
- bigpictureSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- brainstormSkill
- compoundSkill
- confidence-checkSkill
- contextualizeSkill
- create-ship-skillSkill
- create-skillSkill
- curateSkill
- debugSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- devtoolsSkill
- distillSkill
- done-checkSkill
- doneSkill
- double-checkSkill
- envsetSkill
- explainSkill
- fortifySkill
- handoffSkill
- harness-auditSkill
- interviewSkill
- matrixSkill
- mockupSkill
- mutateSkill
- notesSkill
- postmortemSkill
- presentSkill
- qaSkill
- readableSkill
- recommendSkill
- reportSkill
- retireSkill
- review-planSkill
- scoutSkill
- sec-reviewSkill
- setup-ticketingSkill
- setup-worktreesSkill
- spec-checkSkill
- specSkill
- stepsSkill
- successionSkill
- super-reviewSkill
- tangentSkill
- tddSkill
- tend-memorySkill
- testSkill
- ticketSkill
- tldrSkill
- triageSkill
- waitSkill
- workSkill
- worth-itSkill
- wrap-upSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Nothing is staged to act on: If there's no prior recommendation, proposal, or stated judgment in conversation context, ask one short …
- Distinctive: line 29
If I've added a focus below, narrow the work to just that slice: $ARGUMENTS
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Greenlight on the most recent recommendation, proposal, or stated judgment in this conversation — typically the block immediately above in this turn, or in the most recent assistant turn. The /go invocation IS the green light — don't ask "should I proceed?", "want me to start?", or "sound good?". Mathematical!
What counts as actionable is broad: a recommendation, a proposal, a stated judgment — and a forward-looking "Next" / "next steps" / "up next" section that caps a status or orientation response. If that closing section lists several items rather than one committed pick, act on the one marked recommended / top / first, and name which you picked in your transition line. (Generic by design — keyed off the shape of a trailing next-step section, not off any particular skill.)
A plan with parallel: lanes (a /recommend #1): launch every lane first, each in its own new session, then run the here: sequence. Reversed, a /handoff first step can end the turn before any lane launches.
/go N (a bare number as the argument) acts on item N of that numbered list instead of the top pick — /recommend ends on exactly this affordance. Name the item in your transition line. No numbered list on the table → ask which thing N means.
- Begin the work directly. One short transition line is fine ("Going.") but no permission-seeking pause.
- For multi-step work, use TaskCreate to track it and start on step 1.
- For one-shots (single edit, single command), just do it.
The one exception — stop and ask if:
- The action is risky / hard-to-reverse / has wide blast radius (destructive ops, force-push, sending messages, modifying shared infra, publishing to third parties — per the system's "Executing actions with care" guidance).
- You genuinely cannot pick without more info. In that case, ask one sharp question — don't refuse to commit and don't pad with hedges.
- Nothing is staged to act on. If there's no prior recommendation, proposal, or stated judgment in conversation context, ask one short question ("What would you like me to act on?") rather than guessing or sliding into
/recommendterritory. - A condition the recommendation relied on may have gone stale. If it asserted anything time- or state-dependent — the clock ("after market close", "before the 22:30 sync"), "origin hasn't moved", "tests are green", "the deploy is live" — and it wasn't made moments ago, re-check that condition first (
date,git fetch, the status command). Still true → act. No longer true → stop and say what changed. (Example: a "safe to push, it's after hours" note that is a day old by the time /go lands is no longer true.)
Otherwise: commit, execute, report results.
If I've added a focus below, narrow the work to just that slice: $ARGUMENTS
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

