professional-proofreader
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a user asks to "proofread", "review and correct", "fix grammar", "improve readability while keeping my voice", and to proofread a document file and save an updated version.
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- amanuelmamo7/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skilledited, first seen Mar 26, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skill★ 2100% same
- amanuelmamo7/Skills★ 195% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- Skills/Agentic AI Development/AI-research-SKILLs-1.1.0/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-evaluationSkill
- mermaidjs-v11Skill
- plotlySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- data-classification-prompt-standardSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-gainSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- frontend-ui-uxSkill
- aihotSkill
- storage-analyzerSkill
- notebooklm-slidesSkill
- pdf-generatorSkill
- professional-communicationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
Use when user asks to "proofread", "review and correct", "fix grammar", "polish this text", "improve readability while keeping my voice".
- Distinctive: line 22
Use when user asks to proofread a document file (like .docx, .pdf, .txt) and save the updated version as new file with 'UPDATED_' prefix.
- Distinctive: line 54
Always include modification explanations.
- Distinctive: line 55
Always keep quality standards equivalent to: Academic proofreading, business document refinement, pre-publication review.
- Distinctive: line 56
Always follow below editing standards:
- Distinctive: line 87
Never drop formatting intentionally.
- Distinctive: line 88
Never change file name logic beyond request.
- Distinctive: line 89
Never expand the content
- Distinctive: line 108
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Distinctive: line 109
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Distinctive: line 110
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Professional Proofreader
Overview
This skill transforms flawed writing — whether pasted text or uploaded documents — into publication-ready prose without altering the author’s intent. It eliminates grammatical, spelling, punctuation, clarity, and tone issues while strictly preserving the author’s voice and intent. Returns a corrected version plus a structured modification log, or generates an updated file when requested. Not for code editing or technical refactoring.
When to Use
- Use when user asks to "proofread", "review and correct", "fix grammar", "polish this text", "improve readability while keeping my voice".
- Use when user asks to proofread a document file (like .docx, .pdf, .txt) and save the updated version as new file with 'UPDATED_' prefix.
WORKFLOW MODES
This skill operates in two modes:
- Inline Text Mode
- File Processing Mode
MODE 1: Inline Text
Refer markdown for complete inline text mode.
MODE 2: File Processing
Trigger when user says:
- "Proofread [filename].[extension]
- "Edit this document"
- "Correct grammar in this file"
- "Save updated version"
- "Add prefix UPDATED_"
- "Return corrected .[extension]"
Refer markdown for complete file processing mode.
Best Practices
✅ Do: [Good practice]
- Always include modification explanations.
- Always keep quality standards equivalent to: Academic proofreading, business document refinement, pre-publication review.
- Always follow below editing standards:
Grammar
- Subject-verb agreement
- Tense consistency
- Article usage
- Prepositions
- Pronoun clarity
Spelling
- Correct typos
- Maintain original spelling variant (US/UK)
Punctuation
- Commas
- Apostrophes
- Quotation marks
- Sentence boundaries
Style & Tone
- Maintain author voice
- Avoid unnecessary formalization
- Preserve rhetorical choices
Readability
- Improve structure
- Enhance logical flow
- Remove redundancy
❌ Don't: [What to avoid]
- Never alter meaning.
- Never drop formatting intentionally.
- Never change file name logic beyond request.
- Never expand the content
Output Rules
If inline: -> Return Corrected Version + Modifications list.
If file rewrite: -> Save updated file. -> Confirm filename. -> Provide modifications list unless suppressed.
Give friendly message to user in the end.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

