professional-communication
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Guide technical communication for software developers. Covers email structure, team messaging etiquette, meeting agendas, and adapting messages for technical vs non-technical audiences. Use when drafting professional messages, preparing meeting communications, or improving written communication.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- imMamdouhaboammar/kaku-chatgpt-harnessword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Samueladewole/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ccgargantua/gars-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- digitalspeed/claude-code-skillsetword for word, first seen Jun 17, 2026
- nbirkner/digital-brainword for word, first seen Apr 12, 2026
- FelipeAngeli/skillsword for word, first seen Apr 10, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 7
- pedronauck/skills★ 655100% same
- FelipeAngeli/skills★ 2100% same
- digitalspeed/claude-code-skillset★ 1100% same
- imMamdouhaboammar/kaku-chatgpt-harness★ 0100% same
- nbirkner/digital-brain★ 0100% same
- Samueladewole/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- uts58/my-random-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- wpank/ai★ 11same name
- ccgargantua/gars-claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- Skills/Agentic AI Development/AI-research-SKILLs-1.1.0/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-evaluationSkill
- mermaidjs-v11Skill
- plotlySkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- data-classification-prompt-standardSkill
- data-scientistSkill
- ponytail-auditSkill
- ponytail-debtSkill
- ponytail-gainSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- ponytail-reviewSkill
- ponytailSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- frontend-ui-uxSkill
- aihotSkill
- storage-analyzerSkill
- notebooklm-slidesSkill
- pdf-generatorSkill
- professional-proofreaderSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈13
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 32
Use this universal framework to organize any professional message:
- Distinctive: line 50
Before communicating, ask yourself:
- Distinctive: line 53
What level of detail: do they need? (High-level overview vs implementation details)
- Distinctive: line 115
Use threads: - Keep main channels scannable.
- Distinctive: line 116
@mention thoughtfully: - Don't notify people unnecessarily
- Distinctive: line 119
Async-friendly: - Write messages that don't require immediate response
- Distinctive: line 154
Simplify without losing accuracy: - Use analogies; replace jargon with plain language
- Distinctive: line 155
Know when to switch: - Read the room; adjust based on questions and engagement
- Distinctive: line 192
After writing, ask: "So what?
- Distinctive: line 194
If you can't answer clearly, restructure your message to lead with the value/impact.
- Distinctive: line 200
Every meeting invite should include:
- Distinctive: line 237
Before sending any professional communication:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Professional Communication
Overview
This skill provides frameworks and guidance for effective professional communication in software development contexts. Whether you're writing an email to stakeholders, crafting a team chat message, or preparing meeting agendas, these principles help you communicate clearly and build professional credibility.
Core principle: Effective communication isn't about proving how much you know - it's about ensuring your message is received and understood.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Writing emails to teammates, managers, or stakeholders
- Crafting team chat messages or async communications
- Preparing meeting agendas or summaries
- Translating technical concepts for non-technical audiences
- Structuring status updates or reports
- Improving clarity of written communication
Keywords: email, chat, teams, slack, discord, message, writing, communication, meeting, agenda, status update, report
Core Frameworks
The What-Why-How Structure
Use this universal framework to organize any professional message:
| Component | Purpose | Example |
| What | State the topic/request clearly | "We need to delay the release by one week" |
| Why | Explain the reasoning | "Critical bug found in payment processing" |
| How | Outline next steps/action items | "QA will retest by Thursday; I'll update stakeholders Friday" |
Apply to: Emails, status updates, meeting talking points, technical explanations
Three Golden Rules for Written Communication
- Start with a clear subject/purpose - Recipients should immediately grasp what your message is about
- Use bullets, headlines, and scannable formatting - Nobody wants a wall of text
- Key messages first - Busy people appreciate efficiency; state your main point upfront
Audience Calibration
Before communicating, ask yourself:
- Who are you writing to? (Technical peers, managers, stakeholders, customers)
- What level of detail do they need? (High-level overview vs implementation details)
- What's the value for them? (How does this affect their work/decisions?)
Email Best Practices
Subject Line Formula
| Instead of | Try |
| "Project updates" | "Project X: Status Update and Next Steps" |
| "Question" | "Quick question: API rate limiting approach" |
| "FYI" | "FYI: Deployment scheduled for Tuesday 3pm" |
Email Structure Template
**Subject:** [Project/Topic]: [Specific Purpose]
Hi [Name],
[1-2 sentences stating the key point or request upfront]
**Context/Background:**
- [Bullet point 1]
- [Bullet point 2]
**What I need from you:**
- [Specific action or decision needed]
- [Timeline if applicable]
[Optional: Brief next steps or follow-up plan]
Best,
[Your name]Common Email Types
| Type | Key Elements |
| Status Update | Progress summary, blockers, next steps, timeline |
| Request | Clear ask, context, deadline, why it matters |
| Escalation | Issue summary, impact, attempted solutions, needed decision |
| FYI/Announcement | What changed, who's affected, any required action |
For templates: See references/email-templates.md
Team Messaging Etiquette
Note: Examples use Slack terminology, but these principles apply equally to Microsoft Teams, Discord, or any team messaging platform.
When to Use Chat vs Email
| Use Chat | Use Email |
| Quick questions with short answers | Detailed documentation needing records |
| Real-time coordination | Formal communications to stakeholders |
| Informal team discussions | Messages requiring careful review |
| Time-sensitive updates | Complex explanations with multiple parts |
Team Messaging Best Practices
- Use threads - Keep main channels scannable; follow-ups go in threads
- @mention thoughtfully - Don't notify people unnecessarily
- Channel organization - Right channel for right topic
- Be direct - "Can you review my PR?" beats "Hey, are you busy?"
- Async-friendly - Write messages that don't require immediate response
The "No Hello" Principle
Instead of:
You: Hi
You: Are you there?
You: Can I ask you something?
[waiting...]Try:
You: Hi Sarah - quick question about the deployment script.
Getting a permission error on line 42. Have you seen this before?
Here's the error: [paste error]Technical vs Non-Technical Communication
When to Be Technical vs Accessible
| Audience | Approach |
| Engineering peers | Technical details, code examples, architecture specifics |
| Technical managers | Balance of detail and high-level impact |
| Non-technical stakeholders | Business impact, analogies, outcomes over implementation |
| Customers | Plain language, what it means for them, avoid jargon |
Three Strategies for Simplification
- Start with the big picture before details - People process "why" before "how"
- Simplify without losing accuracy - Use analogies; replace jargon with plain language
- Know when to switch - Read the room; adjust based on questions and engagement
Jargon Translation Examples
| Technical | Plain Language |
| "Microservices architecture" | "Our system is split into smaller, independent pieces that can scale separately" |
| "Asynchronous message processing" | "Tasks are queued and processed in the background" |
| "CI/CD pipeline" | "Automated process that tests and deploys our code" |
| "Database migration" | "Updating how our data is organized and stored" |
For more examples: See references/jargon-simplification.md
Writing Clarity Principles
Active Voice Over Passive Voice
Active voice is clearer, more direct, and conveys authority:
| Passive (avoid) | Active (prefer) |
| "A bug was identified by the team" | "The team identified a bug" |
| "The feature will be implemented" | "We will implement the feature" |
| "Errors were found during testing" | "Testing revealed errors" |
Eliminate Filler Words
| Instead of | Use |
| "At this point in time" | "Now" |
| "In the event that" | "If" |
| "Due to the fact that" | "Because" |
| "In order to" | "To" |
| "I just wanted to check if" | "Can you" |
The "So What?" Test
After writing, ask: "So what? Why does this matter to the reader?"
If you can't answer clearly, restructure your message to lead with the value/impact.
Meeting Communication
Before: Agenda Best Practices
Every meeting invite should include:
- Clear objective - What will be accomplished?
- Agenda items - Topics to cover with time estimates
- Preparation required - What should attendees bring/review?
- Expected outcome - Decision needed? Information sharing? Brainstorm?
During: Facilitation Tips
- Time-box discussions - "Let's spend 5 minutes on this, then move on"
- Capture action items live - Who does what by when
- Parking lot - Note off-topic items for later
After: Summary Format
**Meeting: [Topic] - [Date]**
**Attendees:** [Names]
**Key Decisions:**
- [Decision 1]
- [Decision 2]
**Action Items:**
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]
- [ ] [Person]: [Task] - Due [Date]
**Next Steps:**
- [Follow-up meeting if needed]
- [Documents to share]For structures by meeting type: See references/meeting-structures.md
Quick Reference: Communication Checklist
Before sending any professional communication:
- Clear purpose - Can the recipient understand intent in 5 seconds?
- Right audience - Is this the appropriate person/channel?
- Key message first - Is the main point upfront?
- Scannable - Are there bullets, headers, short paragraphs?
- Action clear - Does the recipient know what (if anything) they need to do?
- Jargon check - Will the audience understand all terminology?
- Tone appropriate - Is it professional but not cold?
- Proofread - Any typos or unclear phrasing?
Additional Tools
references/email-templates.md- Ready-to-use email templates by typereferences/meeting-structures.md- Structures for standups, retros, reviewsreferences/jargon-simplification.md- Technical-to-plain-language translations
Companion Skills
feedback-mastery- For difficult conversations and feedback delivery/draft-email- Generate emails using these frameworks
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Version History
- v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

