agentleFS
NovaCode37NovaCode37/claude-security-skills/skills/secret-scanner/SKILL.md

secret-scanner

Skill13 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Scan a codebase for hardcoded secrets — API keys, tokens, private keys and passwords — using a custom regex + Shannon-entropy engine. Use when the user asks to "find secrets", "check for leaked credentials", "scan for API keys", do a pre-commit secret check, or audit a repo before making it public.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run the scanner with --json and parse the findings.

    line 61
  2. Distinctive:

    If the secret is in git history, recommend git filter-repo / BFG and credential rotation — deleting the line is not enough.

    line 66
  3. Very specific:

    If a finding is a known dummy value, treat it as noise.

    line 73

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Secret Scanner

A dependency-free engine that finds committed credentials by combining high-signal vendor regex rules (AWS, GitHub, GCP, Stripe, OpenAI, Anthropic, Hugging Face, Replicate, Groq, Cohere, DigitalOcean, Slack, …) with Shannon-entropy gating to catch generic secrets while keeping false positives low.

When to use this skill

  • "Are there any secrets / API keys committed in this repo?"
  • "Scan this folder before I open-source it."
  • Pre-commit / pre-push credential checks.
  • Investigating a suspected leak.

How to run it

The engine has no third-party dependencies — just Python 3.9+.

# Human-readable report (default)
python skills/secret-scanner/engine.py .

# Machine-readable JSON (pipe into other tooling)
python skills/secret-scanner/engine.py . --json

# Tune entropy sensitivity (lower = more findings)
python skills/secret-scanner/engine.py src/ --min-entropy 3.0

# Include test directories (skipped by default)
python skills/secret-scanner/engine.py . --include-tests

Exit codes: 0 clean · 1 findings present · 2 usage error. This makes it drop-in for CI: a non-zero exit fails the build.

How to interpret results

Each finding reports severity, rule_id, path:line:column, a redacted preview of the value (never the full secret), and the measured entropy.

Severity guide:

  • critical — live credential material (private keys, cloud secret keys, provider tokens). Rotate immediately.
  • high — access key IDs, third-party API keys.
  • medium — generic password=/secret= assignments.
  • low — JWTs and other context-dependent values; verify before acting.

Recommended workflow for Claude

  1. Run the scanner with --json and parse the findings.
  2. For each finding, open the file at the reported line to confirm it is a real secret and not a placeholder/test fixture.
  3. Report confirmed leaks grouped by severity, and advise the user to rotate the credential (committing a fix does not un-leak git history).
  4. If the secret is in git history, recommend git filter-repo / BFG and credential rotation — deleting the line is not enough.

False positives

The engine already filters obvious placeholders (example, <your-key>, xxxx, changeme, ${ENV}, etc.) and gates generic rules behind entropy. If a finding is a known dummy value, treat it as noise. To re-check with stricter entropy, raise --min-entropy.

Notes

  • Binary files, node_modules, .git, virtualenvs and oversized files are skipped automatically.
  • The scanner never prints full secret values — only redacted previews.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.