dependency-check
Skill13 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit project dependencies for known-vulnerable versions and risky pinning. Parses requirements.txt and package.json, matches a bundled offline advisory DB, optionally queries OSV.dev live, and warns about unpinned versions. Use when the user asks to "check dependencies for vulnerabilities", "audit my requirements.txt / package.json", "scan for vulnerable packages", or "is my dependency tree secure".
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MELJOESTEIN/agentic-devsecops-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- kitloomlk-stack/code-review-security-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- elfrost/ai-patchlabtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- dfedoryshchev/weftworkstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Qualimetry/qualimetry-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 4, 2026
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronaintheir own version, first seen Aug 9, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- dfedoryshchev/weftworks★ 5same name
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronain★ 3same name
- DonTizi/CodeGeass★ 2same name
- elfrost/ai-patchlab★ 1same name
- jpoindexter/theft-kit★ 1same name
- Qualimetry/qualimetry-ai-skills★ 1same name
- khanashes/claude-skills★ 0same name
- kitloomlk-stack/code-review-security-kit★ 0same name
- MELJOESTEIN/agentic-devsecops-kit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- cors-auditorSkill
- dockerfile-scanSkill
- http-sec-auditSkill
- jwt-inspectorSkill
- prompt-injection-testerSkill
- sast-liteSkill
- secret-scannerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 60
Run offline first for a fast baseline, then --online for full coverage if the user has network access.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency Check
Scans Python (requirements.txt) and npm (package.json) manifests for
known-vulnerable versions and supply-chain risks. Offline by default — it
ships a bundled advisory database so it runs in air-gapped CI — with an optional
live OSV.dev lookup. Pure standard library.
When to use this skill
- "Are any of my dependencies vulnerable?"
- "Audit requirements.txt / package.json."
- "Check for vulnerable / outdated packages before release."
What it reports
- Known vulnerabilities — version matches against the bundled advisory DB
(or OSV.dev with
--online), with CVE/ID, severity and summary. - Unpinned dependencies — ranges (
^,~,>=) or missing pins that make builds non-reproducible and widen supply-chain exposure.
How to run it
# Offline scan (bundled advisory DB)
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py requirements.txt
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py package.json
# Scan a directory (auto-discovers both manifest types)
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py .
# Live advisory lookup via OSV.dev
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py requirements.txt --online
# JSON output
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py . --json
# Only report MEDIUM or higher findings (unpinned warnings are LOW)
python skills/dependency-check/checker.py . --min-severity mediumExit codes: 0 clean · 1 findings reported · 2 no manifest / usage
error. Unpinned dependencies are reported, so they fail the build too; suppress
them with --no-unpinned, or raise --min-severity to filter advisory
findings out of both the report and the exit code.
Recommended workflow for Claude
- Run offline first for a fast baseline, then
--onlinefor full coverage if the user has network access. - For each vulnerable package, recommend the minimum fixed version and note breaking-change risk.
- Encourage exact pins (
==/ lockfiles) for reproducible, auditable builds.
Note
The bundled DB is intentionally small (well-known historical CVEs) so the tool
is self-contained and testable. For comprehensive coverage use --online
(OSV.dev) or integrate a dedicated scanner; treat the offline DB as a fast
first pass.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

