hook-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants stronger openings for posts, videos, emails, articles, landing pages, or ads and says "write hooks for," "opening line for," "make this attention-grabbing," "hook for my video," "subject line for," "headline ideas," "rewrite this weak opener," or "give me better hooks.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kenashe/x-article-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 21, 2026
- m-binimran/creator-packtheir own version, first seen Jun 14, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- m-binimran/creator-pack★ 3same name
- kenashe/x-article-toolkit★ 2same name
- sidchaudhary/gtm-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- debug-detectiveSkill
- idea-validatorSkill
- risk-calculatorSkill
- terms-decoderSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 137
Default to 2 hooks per formula across 5 formulas unless the user requests a different mix.
- Distinctive: line 140
Prefer concrete nouns, outcomes, tensions, and numbers over generic adjectives.
- Distinctive: line 141
If the user supplies a weak opener, diagnose why it fails and rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 143
Avoid clickbait that the body cannot support.
- Distinctive: line 144
Keep hooks short enough to survive the platform's first-line truncation when possible.
- Distinctive: line 145
When the topic is technical, preserve accuracy.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Hook Writer
Output Format
HOOK GENERATOR
--------------------------------------------------
Topic: [topic]
Audience: [audience]
Platform: [X / LinkedIn / YouTube / Email / Blog]
Goal: [click / read / reply / watch / share]
TOP 10 HOOKS
1. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
2. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
3. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
4. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
5. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
6. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
7. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
8. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
9. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
10. [FORMULA] [hook text]
Score: Specificity [1-5] + Curiosity [1-5] + Relevance [1-5] = [total]/15
BEST PICK
Hook: [best-performing option]
Why: [short rationale]
A/B VARIANTS
A. [variant]
B. [variant]
C. [variant]
ANTI-PATTERN CHECK
Weak opener: [original weak line if provided]
Why weak: [vague / generic / low stakes / no novelty]
Rewrite: [stronger line]Hook Formula Library
PATTERN INTERRUPT
Definition: Break the reader's default expectation fast.
Example: "Stop posting more. Start posting narrower."
BOLD CLAIM
Definition: Make a sharp, defensible claim that invites reaction.
Example: "Most productivity advice makes good people slower."
CURIOSITY GAP
Definition: Reveal a result but withhold the mechanism.
Example: "The email tweak that doubled replies had nothing to do with copy."
CONTRARIAN
Definition: Attack the accepted belief and replace it.
Example: "Consistency is overrated. Precision is what compounds."
SPECIFIC NUMBER
Definition: Use a precise number to signal proof or concreteness.
Example: "7 landing-page edits that lifted conversion by 18%."
PAIN POINT
Definition: Name the frustration the audience already feels.
Example: "You are not lazy. Your workflow is leaking attention."
STORY OPEN
Definition: Start inside a moment with tension or consequence.
Example: "I almost killed the launch 10 minutes before checkout opened."Platform Notes
PLATFORM FIT
X / TWITTER Short, punchy, opinionated, first 8 words matter most
LINKEDIN Strong professional payoff, clear lesson, less slang
YOUTUBE Promise a payoff or reveal in spoken rhythm
EMAIL SUBJECT Tight, curiosity-heavy, high clarity, no wasted words
BLOG HEADLINE Search-friendly clarity plus one clear anglePlatform-Specific Hook Patterns
X / TWITTER
Template: [sharp opinion] + [specific payoff]
Example: "Most remote teams do not need more meetings. They need one better handoff."
LINKEDIN
Template: [professional insight] + [evidence or result]
Example: "We cut onboarding time by 41% after removing one 'best practice.'"
YOUTUBE
Template: [pain or curiosity] + [promised reveal]
Example: "Why smart teams still miss deadlines, and the fix nobody teaches."
EMAIL SUBJECT
Template: [specific result] or [tight curiosity question]
Example: "The 12-minute fix for slower weekly reviews"
BLOG HEADLINE
Template: [keyword/topic] + [clear angle] + [payoff]
Example: "Remote Work Productivity: 7 Workflow Fixes That Reduce Context Switching"Anti-Patterns
ANTI-PATTERNS
--------------------------------------------------
"Here are some tips..." -> weak because generic; lead with outcome or tension
"I wanted to share..." -> weak because self-focused; lead with reader value
"Let's talk about..." -> weak because low stakes; name the consequence
"In today's world..." -> weak because empty; replace with a specific claim
"This changed everything..." -> weak because vague; specify what changed and by how muchRULES
- Generate 10 hooks using at least 5 distinct formulas.
- Default to 2 hooks per formula across 5 formulas unless the user requests a different mix.
- Score every hook with
Specificity + Curiosity + Relevanceout of 15. - Match the hook to the requested platform; do not write email subjects like YouTube titles.
- Prefer concrete nouns, outcomes, tensions, and numbers over generic adjectives.
- If the user supplies a weak opener, diagnose why it fails and rewrite it.
- Pick one best hook and produce 3 A/B variants of that same angle.
- Avoid clickbait that the body cannot support.
- Keep hooks short enough to survive the platform's first-line truncation when possible.
- When the topic is technical, preserve accuracy; novelty cannot come from false claims.
EXAMPLE TRIGGER PHRASES
- "write hooks for my post about remote work productivity"
- "opening line for a video about cold outreach"
- "make this attention-grabbing"
- "hook for my video about debugging faster"
- "subject line for an email about churn reduction"
- "rewrite this weak headline"
- "give me 10 better hooks for this topic"
Generation Procedure
1. Identify topic, audience, platform, and goal.
2. Generate 10 hooks across at least 5 formulas, defaulting to 2 hooks each from 5 formulas.
3. Score each hook out of 15.
4. Rank them and choose the best pick.
5. Create 3 A/B variants from the winning angle.
6. If a weak opener exists, rewrite it in the anti-pattern check.This skill is part of the NOUMENON Content & Marketing Pack — gumroad.com/noumenon-ai
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

