marketing-loops
Skill870 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
7
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Check for product marketing context first: if .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy …
- Common: line 29
Every loop in the catalog has these nine parts.
- Common: line 63
Not everything should be automated on a cadence.
- Common: line 68
It's a vanity loop: If nobody acts on the output, delete the loop.
- Common: line 80
Default to time-of-day cron for review-style loops (weekly review, ranking watch) and dynamic pacing for monitor-until-threshold loops …
- Common: line 94
No self-check → the loop acts on noise, seasonality, or a tracking bug.
- Common: line 95
No human checkpoint on spend/publish actions.
- Common: line 100
Avoid: "set it and forget it," "fully autonomous marketing," "AI does everything," "10x on autopilot," "growth hacking machine." Loops are …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Marketing Loops
You help set up marketing loops — repeatable marketing workflows an AI agent runs on a cadence, each with a defined trigger, a bounded set of steps, a self-check, and an explicit stopping condition. A loop turns a marketing task you'd otherwise do manually (and forget) into an always-on system: the weekly SEO opportunity scan, the ad-fatigue refresh, the churn-signal watch.
This is the operational cousin of marketing-ideas. Ideas tell you what to try once. Loops tell you what to keep doing on a schedule — and wire the other marketing skills together to do it.
How to Use This Skill
Check for product marketing context first: if .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for what's missing.
Then:
- Clarify the job. What outcome should this loop protect or grow? (rankings, ad efficiency, activation, retention, revenue, referrals)
- Pick a loop from the catalog in
references/loop-catalog.md— or adapt the closest one. - Tune the cadence to how fast the underlying signal actually changes (see the cadence rule below).
- Confirm the human checkpoint. Decide what the loop does autonomously vs. what it stages for human approval before publishing or spending — see
references/loop-guardrails.md. - Schedule it (see "Scheduling a loop" below).
Building more than one loop, or a whole marketing operating system? See references/loop-orchestration.md for how loops compose and the order to adopt them (start with tracking + a weekly review; don't build 43 at once).
Anatomy of a Marketing Loop
Every loop in the catalog has these nine parts. When you author or adapt one, fill all of them — a loop missing a stop condition, a self-check, or its state handling is a liability, not an asset.
| Part | What it defines |
| Check cadence | How often the loop looks (weekly / daily / on-trigger). Match it to signal speed. |
| Acts when | The action condition — what must be true to actually do something, vs. just check and skip. Most runs of a good loop are "checked, nothing to do." |
| Purpose | The one outcome this loop exists to move. |
| Skills used | Which marketing skills the loop orchestrates each iteration. |
| Loop body | The ordered steps run each iteration. |
| Self-check | The verification done before acting — so the loop doesn't act on noise, seasonality, or a tracking bug. |
| State / idempotency | What the loop remembers between runs: last-run marker, dedupe key, cooldown window, "already handled" set. Without this, loops double-act, re-nag the same people, or re-alert the same thing. Non-negotiable for anything scheduled — see references/loop-state.md for where state lives and the idempotency patterns. |
| Stop / bail-out | When the loop skips, halts, escalates to a human, or disables itself — plus what it does on error. Every loop needs one, including heartbeat loops (their stop is "manual disable + error-halt," never "n/a"). |
| Output | Where results go: a file, a PR, a staged draft, a notification, a report. |
The Check cadence / Acts when split matters: a churn-signal loop might check daily but only act when an account crosses a risk threshold it hasn't been contacted about inside the cooldown window. Conflating the two produces loops that either miss the window or spam.
The cadence rule
Match cadence to how fast the signal actually changes — not to how often you'd like an update.
| Signal | Realistic cadence | Why |
| Rankings, backlinks, domain authority | Weekly | Move slowly; daily checks are noise |
| Ad creative fatigue, CPA drift | Every 2–3 days | Meta/Google feedback loops are days, not hours |
| Activation / onboarding funnel | Weekly | Needs enough signups to be significant |
| Churn signals | Daily or on-trigger | Early intervention window is short |
| Content / copy decay | Monthly | Traffic erosion is gradual |
| Competitor changes | Weekly | Pricing/positioning shifts are infrequent but matter |
| Social listening / mentions | Daily | Engagement windows close fast |
Over-frequent loops are the most common failure mode: they generate busywork, burn budget, and train you to ignore the output.
When NOT to loop
Not everything should be automated on a cadence. Skip a loop — or add a mandatory human checkpoint — when:
- Strategy or creative direction is the real work. Loops maintain and optimize; they don't set positioning, invent campaigns, or make brand calls.
- The action publishes or spends without review. Auto-drafting an ad, email, or post is fine. Auto-publishing or auto-shifting budget needs a human checkpoint unless the user has explicitly authorized autonomous action and set guardrails (caps, allowlists).
- The signal is too sparse to be significant. A weekly conversion-rate loop on 40 visitors/week is measuring noise.
- It's a vanity loop. If nobody acts on the output, delete the loop. A loop that emails a dashboard nobody reads is worse than nothing.
For any loop that sends, spends, publishes, or touches personal data, apply references/loop-guardrails.md — the two-tier action model (autonomous-safe vs. gated), spend/send caps, CAN-SPAM/GDPR/FTC/ToS rules, the always-escalate list, and a required kill switch.
Scheduling a loop
These loops are agent-agnostic — the body works in any agent. The scheduling depends on your environment:
- Claude Code — native options:
/loop(self-paced, until a condition),ScheduleWakeup(dynamic pacing that reacts to state), andCronCreate(fixed cron schedule). If you have a loop-mechanics skill such asloopifyinstalled, use it to choose between them and tune delays; otherwise the guidance below is enough. - Any agent + cron — wrap the loop body as a scheduled prompt/script (
0 9 * * 1for Mondays 9am, etc.). - Manual cadence — for high-judgment loops, "run this skill every Monday" is a perfectly good loop. The value is the repeatable body, not the automation.
Default to time-of-day cron for review-style loops (weekly review, ranking watch) and dynamic pacing for monitor-until-threshold loops (churn watch, launch-day tracking).
The Catalog
references/loop-catalog.md holds the full library — 43 marketing loops with thorough funnel coverage: SEO & Content, Paid, Earned/Social/Partnerships, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral & Advocacy, and Ongoing Ops. Each is a complete, adaptable spec. Start there, pick the closest match, and tune it to the user's product, stage, and tooling.
Authoring a new loop
When nothing in the catalog fits, author a new loop from references/loop-template.md — a copy-paste template with fill-in prompts, a worked before/after example, and a ship checklist. Fill all nine anatomy parts; if you can't answer the self-check, state/idempotency, and stop/bail-out concretely, the loop isn't ready to run.
Anti-patterns
- Looping without a stop condition → runaway spend or infinite churn.
- Same cadence for every loop → most run too often and get ignored.
- No self-check → the loop acts on noise, seasonality, or a tracking bug.
- No human checkpoint on spend/publish actions.
- Building 10 loops at once → start with one, prove it earns its keep, then add the next.
Banned vocabulary
Avoid: "set it and forget it," "fully autonomous marketing," "AI does everything," "10x on autopilot," "growth hacking machine." Loops are disciplined systems with checkpoints, not magic. Describe them honestly.
Related Skills
- marketing-ideas — one-off tactics and inspiration (what to try). Loops operationalize the ones worth repeating.
- ab-testing — the experimentation loop specifically (hypothesis → test → promote winner → repeat).
- analytics — most loops read from analytics to decide whether to act.
- Individual channel skills (
ads,seo-audit,emails,social,churn-prevention,pricing,referrals) — the loop bodies orchestrate these.
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 12
- open-fox/agents★ 55100% same
- TommyBez/skillsboard★ 10100% same
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- ngothanhtung/claude-code-skills★ 1100% same
- patinaproject/skills★ 1100% same
- productionx-in/Core-Skills★ 1100% same
- xeroc/skills★ 1100% same
- chaakresh/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- claude1cryptwareinfotech-star/Claude-Skill★ 0100% same
- FelipeCVelame/claude-skills★ 0100% same
2 more not listed
Edited · 4
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 58k87% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 389% same
- Gopyr/gopyr-skills-hub★ 083% same
- masterpeteworld/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- david-corroy/skills-marketing-fr★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.MDAGENTS.md
- ai-seoSkill
- analyticsSkill
- attributionSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- co-marketingSkill
- community-marketingSkill
- competitor-profilingSkill
- competitorsSkill
- content-strategySkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- imageSkill
- influencer-marketingSkill
- launchSkill
- marketing-councilSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- marketing-planSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- offersSkill
- onboardingSkill
- pricingSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seoSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- videoSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

