pitch-packager
Skill339 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Package a finished piece of work (spec, prototype, implementation notes) into a single document that gets reviewers to understanding and approval fast. Use when the user needs buy-in, a review, or a shareable summary of what was built and why.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- edenbuilds/agentloopword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- edenbuilds/agentloop★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-interface-designSkill
- assumption-testSkill
- blindspot-passSkill
- brainstorm-prototypesSkill
- change-quizSkill
- context-auditSkill
- implementation-notesSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- interview-meSkill
- progressive-disclosureSkill
- reference-huntSkill
- regression-proofSkill
- test-blindspotsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Keep it one page. Link out to the spec, notes, and diff rather than inlining them.
- Distinctive: line 24
Never oversell: a pitch that hides a known weakness converts one approval into a permanent credibility loss.
- Distinctive: line 26
If the work isn't actually ready, the honest pitch is a status update, and saying so is part of this skill.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pitch packager
Reviewers start with the same unknowns the builder started with, plus one more: whether the builder accounted for the failure points an expert would probe. A good pitch doc kills both in one read.
Steps
- Collect the artifacts: the spec or plan, the prototype or demo, the implementation notes, and the diff. Ask for a demo recording or screenshots if any user-facing behavior changed — lead with that.
- Structure the document in reading order for a skeptic:
- The demo — what it looks like working, first. A GIF or screenshot beats prose.
- The problem and the bet — two paragraphs max: what this solves and the approach chosen over the alternatives.
- What an expert would ask — the 3-5 hard questions a reviewer in this domain would raise (edge cases, scale, failure modes, migration), each answered honestly, including "not handled, here's why that's acceptable for now."
- Deviations from plan — lifted straight from implementation-notes, because surprises found in review cost trust.
- What's NOT in this change — scope fences, so the review doesn't sprawl.
- Keep it one page. Link out to the spec, notes, and diff rather than inlining them.
- Match the medium to the venue: a Slack-pasteable doc, a PR description, or a standalone HTML page — ask which if unclear.
Guardrails
- Never oversell: a pitch that hides a known weakness converts one approval into a permanent credibility loss.
- The "what an expert would ask" section is the heart. If it's easy to write, the questions aren't hard enough.
- If the work isn't actually ready, the honest pitch is a status update, and saying so is part of this skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.