guide
Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Show review-loop usage guide: how it works, commands, configuration, and key features. Use when the user asks for help with review-loop.
20 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cafe3310/public-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- juanbermudez/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Jasenpan1987/multi-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- assisjp/specflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- helderberto/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sangchane/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use grill, brainstorm and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
renatorozasSkillgrill
Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkillbrainstorm
Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Hugging FaceSkillimplement
Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillresearch
Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions20 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 20
- recharts/recharts★ 28ksame name
- cafe3310/public-agent-skills★ 256same name
- Senuto/nodeshub-seo-skills★ 40same name
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 34same name
- helderberto/agent-skills★ 19same name
- assisjp/specflow★ 17same name
- froster02/mini-Brain_skills★ 4same name
- MEKO747/claude-code-skill★ 4same name
- leepokai/claude-code-guide★ 2same name
- spleenteo/maestro★ 2same name
10 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- guideSkill
- paired-sessionSkill
- review-loopSkill
- review-prSkill
- code-quality-loopSkill
- paired-sessionSkill
- reorganizeSkill
- review-loopSkill
- review-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 66
Every run uses one mode: every sandbox applies and no permission probe exists (permission-probe and strict mode were removed in v3.7.0.
- Very specific: line 111
Create .review-loop/config.md in your project to customize:
- Distinctive: line 176
Run from macOS or native Windows.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
First, read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/.claude-plugin/plugin.json to get the current version number.
Then display the following guide to the user, replacing {VERSION} with the version from plugin.json:
review-loop {VERSION} — Quick Reference
How it works
/review-loop <work item description> [--handsfree]
review-loop entry (resolves `entry`, runs the stage A checks)
│
└── paired-session coordinator (run directory under <repo>/.review-loop/runs/)
├── PLAN author drafts the plan → independent reviewer → iterate
├── EXEC author implements → reviewer + shadow review → iterate
├── GATE adversarial gate
├── with lifecycle on: FINISH → POLISH-Q specialists → docs → security
└── DONE (or HOLD) → you accept or reject; nothing ships without your decisionCommands
| Command | What it does |
/review-loop <work item> | The default entry: fresh work → paired-session; existing code → paired-session run --review-only; an existing plan → paired-session with the plan as the work item (Entry below) |
/review-loop:paired-session <work item> [--plan-only] | Runs the paired-session coordinator directly: independent PLAN review, EXEC implementation and review, adversarial gate, then finish, quality polish, docs and security with lifecycle on. Lifecycle off stops after the gate; acceptance returns the uncommitted tree. It ends at DONE (or HOLD); the agent accepts or rejects a DONE run only on your explicit decision. --plan-only stops after the approved plan |
/review-loop:review-pr [PR number|PR URL|ref] [aspects] | Paired-session report mode (below) |
/review-loop:code-quality-loop [max-rounds] | A review-only paired-session run on the uncommitted change (with lifecycle on, one fix round for the non-blocking findings, quality writers on; accept normally commits locally unless auto_commit: false; lifecycle off stops after the gate and acceptance returns the uncommitted tree); --legacy, --reorganize and entry: legacy are refused (legacy removed in v2.13.0) |
/review-loop:reorganize | Reorganizes code file structure without changing behaviour (standalone) |
/review-loop:guide | This guide |
The legacy workflow was removed in v2.13.0 (routing) and v2.13.1 (/review-loop:legacy,
/review-loop:plan, /review-loop:execute and its protocol files). Their replacements:
plan-only work → /review-loop:paired-session <work item> --plan-only; an existing plan or a review of
existing code → /review-loop. Legacy session files under .review-loop/sessions/ are left on disk and
never read; resuming one is refused. See docs/paired-session-migration.md.
Entry
The entry key in .review-loop/config.md takes legacy or paired-session, written unquoted (exact values only; since v2.13.0 legacy is refused, and anything else is warned about and treated as absent).
With the key absent or paired-session, fresh work, an existing plan (used as the
work item; PLAN drafts and reviews it again) and a review-only request on
existing code (run --review-only, plus --base <ref> when you name a base) are
handed to paired-session; resuming a legacy session is refused. Unrelated dirty
work is not existing code: a review-only run reviews and, with auto_commit,
delivers every change against its base. A failed check before the
coordinator starts (a host other than macOS or native Windows, required CLIs, background or outside-sandbox
execution, Codex home, on Codex an installed plugin older than v2.10.0, or a
declined or unanswered worktree or test-command question; under handsfree any
such question counts as unanswered) refuses with the reason, whether the key is set or not
(unavailable background or outside-sandbox execution is reported as HOLD); nothing falls back.
Once the coordinator has started, a refusal or HOLD is reported. Roles come from the
operator profile you name or ~/.config/review-loop/paired-session.json;
without one, Codex is the author and gate and Claude the reviewer.
Gemini (Antigravity CLI agy) is an optional third vendor for the reviewer and the gate (README.md, Configuration).
Every run uses one mode: every sandbox applies and no permission probe exists (permission-probe and strict mode
were removed in v3.7.0; --strict only prints a NOTE). A reviewer turn that changes the
workspace is voided and restored, and an author commit is a HOLD.
Platforms: macOS and native Windows (Linux and WSL are refused). On Windows --detach is refused, Claude roles run without the Claude Code Bash sandbox, Git for
Windows (Git Bash) is required, and run directories and workspaces stay out of OneDrive-synced folders.
On Codex, ask "use paired-session for this task".
Details: docs/paired-session-migration.md.
/review-loop:review-pr [PR number|PR URL|ref] [aspects] runs the paired-session report mode
(entry: legacy and --legacy are refused since v2.13.0).
A PR or ref is reviewed in a temporary clone (the operator's checkout is never
touched); no tests run unless you confirm a test command; the EXEC reviewer,
shadow, gate, the selected specialists (code errors comments types tests) and
the security stage report into review-report.md in the run directory, and
nothing is fixed, committed or posted. Posting is a separate request with a
secret scan and a second confirmation of the full body (gh pr review
--comment only). simplify is a writer and is refused on this route
(run /review-loop:code-quality-loop on the change (its POLISH-Q simplifier)).
Usage
# Basic — starts the paired-session plan→review→implement→CR run
/review-loop add rate limiting to the /api/upload endpoint
# If code is already written, it hands off as a review-only run
/review-loop review the changes I just made to the parser
# I already have a plan: /review-loop (the plan becomes the work item)
/review-loop implement this plan: <plan text>
# Plan only
/review-loop:paired-session design an adaptive rate limiter for /api/upload --plan-only
# Show this guide — slash command or natural language
/review-loop:guide
show me the review-loop guideAfter updating the plugin: exit with Ctrl-C twice, then
claude --resumeto reload plugins while keeping your conversation. Old sessions keep using the version loaded at startup.
Configuration
Create .review-loop/config.md in your project to customize:
| Key | Default | Description |
entry | absent (paired-session) | paired-session (legacy is refused since v2.13.0); routes every /review-loop (Claude) or review-loop skill (Codex) request, review-pr and code-quality-loop (see Entry above) |
soft_limit_plan | 3 | Becomes --max-plan-rounds (a hard cap that HOLDs blocking reviews) |
soft_limit_exec | unset → 4 | Becomes --max-exec-rounds (a hard cap that HOLDs blocking reviews) |
docs_file | CHANGELOG.md | Becomes --docs-file; "" to skip |
skip_quality_polish | false | Becomes --skip-quality-polish |
review_focus | "" | Project-specific review priorities (free text), given to the reviewer, shadow and gate |
review_style | "" | Tone and rules for the review roles and the POLISH-Q specialists |
quality_focus | "" | Quality priorities for the POLISH-Q specialists |
auto_commit | — | A review-only run (/review-loop on existing code, code-quality-loop) with lifecycle on normally makes one local commit at accept; false here keeps it uncommitted. Lifecycle off returns the uncommitted tree. Not applied on the main pipeline (true prints a warning; set it in the operator profile) |
handsfree | false | Blocks stage A questions (any such question fails); accept, reject and withdraw-findings are never run |
Unset paired-session caps are plan 3 / exec 4 rounds. reviewer_model and executor_model only warn
(models come from the operator profile); the other legacy keys are ignored. See
docs/paired-session-migration.md (Config mapping).
review_focus examples
# Backend
review_focus: |
- Concurrency: race conditions, deadlocks, mutex usage
- Test coverage: error paths, not just happy paths
# Frontend
review_focus: |
- Security: XSS, CSRF, input sanitization
- Accessibility: WCAG, keyboard nav, screen reader
# Web API
review_focus: |
- Security: auth checks, rate limiting, input validation
- API contract: backward compatibility, proper status codesKey features
- Independent review — the reviewer, shadow and gate never share the author's session
- Hard caps — blocking PLAN/EXEC reviews HOLD at the cap;
resume --add-rounds N(1-10) continues the run. Eligible advisory-only reviews get one repair attempt per phase, then advisory acceptance, or exit at the cap without an attempt. Writer replay takes the advisory exit at any round and preserves the attempt. Blocking rounds preserve it; send-back grants a new EXEC attempt. EXEC needs a passed configured test, own run evidence and the current tree. See the advisory rules for open ledger rows. - Acceptance stays yours — a DONE run is accepted or rejected only on your explicit decision
- Project-specific config — tailor review priorities per project
More info
GitHub: https://github.com/NYTC69/review-loop
Troubleshooting
- A plugin update does not take effect. Claude Code loads plugins at session start, and
/reload-pluginsdoes not switch versions. After/plugin update, start a new session (or exit with Ctrl-C twice andclaude --resumeto keep the conversation). - A headless (
claude -p) run stops when the turn ends.-pexits at the end of its turn and kills the background coordinator. Use an interactive session; on macOS a headless session can start the run with--detach(it returns at once with its pid and log;stopends it). --detachis refused on Windows. A headless session is not supported there. Drop the flag and use an interactive session.- An entry refuses with
paired-session needs macOS or native Windows. Linux (WSL included) is not supported. Run from macOS or native Windows. - A slash command does nothing in Codex (
Unrecognized command). Codex matches skills by their description, in natural language only. Ask in plain words, for example "run review-loop on this branch" or "review PR 123".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

