agentleFS
NYTC69NYTC69/review-loop/.agents/skills/guide/SKILL.md

guide

Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Codex guide for review-loop - the paired-session entry, review-pr and the shared .review-loop/config.md. Use when the user asks how review-loop works, what it can do, how to configure it, or for help with review-loop ('how do I use review-loop', 'review-loop help', 'what does the entry key do'). Not for starting a run or reviewing local changes (use review-loop) or a PR, branch or ref review (use review-pr).

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use grill, brainstorm and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • renatorozasSkill

    grill

    Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    implement

    Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Keep the shared review-loop config in .review-loop/config.md.

    line 60
  2. Very specific:

    Start a fresh Codex session after installation (docs/install-codex.md).

    line 71
  3. Distinctive:

    Run from macOS or native Windows.

    line 78

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

review-loop Guide

What review-loop Does in Codex

A review-loop request goes to the Codex review-loop skill, which resolves the entry key in .review-loop/config.md and hands the work item to the Codex paired-session skill. That skill runs the coordinator through plan, implementation and review. With lifecycle on, finish, polish, docs and security follow, up to DONE. With lifecycle off, it stops after the gate; acceptance returns the uncommitted tree. It accepts only on your explicit acceptance. A request to review existing code hands off the same way as run --review-only, and an existing plan becomes the work item (PLAN drafts and reviews it again). entry: legacy, asking for "the legacy review-loop workflow" and resuming a legacy session are refused, and a failed check before the coordinator starts refuses instead of falling back. Every run uses one mode (every sandbox, no permission probe: permission-probe and strict mode were removed in v3.7.0; --strict only prints a NOTE). The legacy workflow was removed in v2.13.0 (routing) and v2.13.1 (the Codex plan and execute skills, the Codex Stage 1 workflow and its agents). Legacy session files under .review-loop/sessions/ are left on disk and never read. Details: docs/paired-session-migration.md.

A request to review a pull request ("review PR 123", a PR URL), a branch or ref goes to the Codex review-pr skill, which runs the paired-session report mode (entry: legacy and asking for the legacy review-pr are refused): it reviews it in a temporary clone with no tests unless you confirm one, writes review-report.md, and fixes, commits or posts nothing; posting is a separate request with a secret scan and a second confirmation of the full body. simplify is not available there (Claude Code: run /review-loop:code-quality-loop on the change (its POLISH-Q simplifier)).

Skills in Codex

  • review-loop, paired-session, review-pr
  • guide

Not on Codex:

  • code-quality-loop (ask review-loop to review an existing change instead: a review-only run with the quality writers on)
  • reorganize

Usage Notes

  • The entry skills load their instructions via docs/protocol/loading.md and scripts/read_protocol.py, shared with Claude Code.
  • Codex loads the skills from the installed plugin (codex plugin add review-loop@review-loop-marketplace, see docs/install-codex.md), not from the workspace.
  • macOS and native Windows: every entry refuses another host (paired-session needs macOS or native Windows; Linux (WSL included) and other hosts are not supported). On Windows --detach is refused, Git for Windows (Git Bash) is required, and run directories and workspaces stay out of OneDrive-synced folders. On Windows the Codex skills run their commands in PowerShell as best effort; the Claude Code entry is the tested Windows path.
  • Hard caps — blocking PLAN/EXEC reviews HOLD at the cap; resume --add-rounds N (1-10) continues the run. Eligible advisory-only reviews get one repair attempt per phase, then advisory acceptance, or exit at the cap without an attempt. Writer replay takes the advisory exit at any round and preserves the attempt. Blocking rounds preserve it; send-back grants a new EXEC attempt. EXEC needs a passed configured test, own run evidence and the current tree. See the advisory rules for open ledger rows.
  • Keep the shared review-loop config in .review-loop/config.md; roles and models come from the paired-session operator profile; gemini (Antigravity CLI agy) is an optional third vendor for the reviewer and the gate (README.md, Configuration). Which config keys apply (round limits, docs_file, skip_quality_polish, review_focus, review_style, quality_focus, handsfree, and auto_commit on a review-only run) is listed in docs/protocol/paired-session-entry.md (Profile and settings).
  • A review of existing code is a review-only run. With lifecycle on, accept normally makes one local commit (never a push); auto_commit: false in .review-loop/config.md keeps the accepted change uncommitted. Lifecycle off stops after the gate; acceptance returns the uncommitted tree.

Troubleshooting

  • The skills are missing right after an install. A fresh Codex session is what loads the plugin's skills. Start a fresh Codex session after installation (docs/install-codex.md).
  • A slash command does nothing (Unrecognized command). Slash commands such as /review-loop:paired-session are Claude Code only; Codex matches skills by their description, in natural language only. Ask in plain words, for example "run review-loop on this branch", "review PR 123" or "use paired-session for this task".
  • --detach is refused on Windows. A headless session is not supported there. Drop the flag and use an interactive session.
  • An entry refuses with paired-session needs macOS or native Windows. Linux (WSL included) is not supported. Run from macOS or native Windows.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.