agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/NeMo-Fabric/AGENTS.md

NeMo-Fabric

AGENTS.md73 starsChanged 56 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

NeMo Fabric ships two tiers of agent skills. Use the tier that matches your task: - Integration skills — skills/. For integrating NeMo Fabric into an external application through the public Python SDK or building a third-party adapter through the published adapter contract. They are self-contained and exportable, depending only on supported public contracts and documentation, never on repository internals. Start with skills/README.md. - Maintainer skills — .agents/skills/. For contributing to NeMo Fabric itself: API, documentation, testing, CI, packaging, release,…

  • Commits and pushes

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep the tiers separate: do not add external integration guidance to the maintainer set, or repository-internal contribution steps to the …

    line 23
  2. Very specific:

    Update user-facing entry points when public behavior, the nemo-fabric package (imported as nemo_fabric), examples, or supported bindings …

    line 50
  3. Very specific:

    Keep public bindings current when the API changes: docs/sdk/python.mdx for the Python SDK.

    line 51
  4. Very specific:

    Keep release policy and the end-to-end maintainer workflow in RELEASING.md.

    line 58
  5. Very specific:

    Keep the stable public wrapper scripts/generate_api_docs.sh at the scripts/ root in docs and examples.

    line 59
  6. Very specific:

    Use branch prefixes for your work: chore/, feat/, fix/, docs/, test/, or refactor/.

    line 60
  7. Very specific:

    Use Conventional Commit PR titles (<type>: <summary>) as required by .coderabbit.yaml and the prepare-pr skill.

    line 62
  8. Distinctive:

    Use signed-off commits for PR work: git commit -s.

    line 63
  9. Distinctive:

    When creating a pull request from the current branch, target the upstream repository rather than a fork.

    line 64
  10. Very specific:

    Before creating, opening, publishing, or editing a pull request, read .github/pull_request_template.md and use it as the PR body skeleton …

    line 65
  11. Very specific:

    If repo-local PR guidance such as the prepare-pr skill conflicts with generic GitHub connector or plugin guidance, follow the repo-local PR …

    line 66

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md
<!-- SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (c) 2026, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES. All rights reserved. SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 -->

AGENTS.md

Agent Skills

NeMo Fabric ships two tiers of agent skills. Use the tier that matches your task:

  • Integration skills — skills/. For integrating NeMo Fabric into an external application through the public Python SDK or building a third-party adapter through the published adapter contract. They are self-contained and exportable, depending only on supported public contracts and documentation, never on repository internals. Start with skills/README.md.
  • Maintainer skills — .agents/skills/. For contributing to NeMo Fabric itself: API, documentation, testing, CI, packaging, release, and PR preparation. They may reference repository internals and contribution commands. Start with .agents/skills/README.md.

Keep the tiers separate: do not add external integration guidance to the maintainer set, or repository-internal contribution steps to the integration set. Coding agents that auto-discover skills read the maintainer set from .agents/skills/ (also exposed at .claude/skills for Claude Code); the integration set under skills/ is meant to be exported into another project.

Key conventions for the two tiers:

  • Discovery wiring: .claude/skills symlinks to .agents/skills/ (the maintainer set) for Claude Code; integration skills under skills/ are copied into another project rather than auto-discovered from this repository (see skills/README.md).
  • Portability strategy: integration skills link to public GitHub documentation and example URLs rather than a docs-site domain, so they keep working when exported.
  • Supported integration surface: the integration tier ships skills/nemo-fabric-integrate for typed Python SDK integration and skills/nemo-fabric-build-adapter for third-party adapter authoring. Future integration skills also live directly under skills/ so they can be validated and published independently; repository-internal adapter maintenance stays in .agents/skills/.

Documentation And Contribution Workflow

These workflow notes keep public documentation, examples, and PR preparation aligned with repository expectations.

  • Update user-facing entry points when public behavior, the nemo-fabric package (imported as nemo_fabric), examples, or supported bindings change: README.md, the Fern docs under docs/ (navigation in docs/index.yml, site config in fern/docs.yml), and the adapter/integration READMEs (adapters/README.md, adapters/*/README.md, adapters/*/*/README.md, sdk/python/nemo-fabric-runtime/src/nemo_fabric/integrations/*/README.md, examples/README.md).
  • Keep public bindings current when the API changes: docs/sdk/python.mdx for the Python SDK; adapter-contract/python/ and adapter-contract/typescript/ for the southbound adapter contract; the JSON Schema notes in schemas/SCHEMA.md; the generated references under docs/reference/api/; and the integration skills under skills/ (which restate public contracts and must be kept in parity). Regenerate docs with just docs after changing the docs site.
  • Keep release policy and the end-to-end maintainer workflow in RELEASING.md; keep packaging implementation guidance in .agents/skills/maintain-packaging/SKILL.md. Do not move release-history policy into user-facing docs or add a duplicate CHANGELOG.md.
  • Keep the stable public wrapper scripts/generate_api_docs.sh at the scripts/ root in docs and examples. Reference namespaced helper paths under scripts/docs/ only when documenting internal maintenance work.
  • Use branch prefixes for your work: chore/, feat/, fix/, docs/, test/, or refactor/.
  • Name branches after the work, never the Linear ticket. Do not embed ticket IDs or slugs in the branch name (e.g. use feat/notebooks-onboarding, not feat/fabric-70-notebooks-onboarding). This rule has historically been overlooked, so double-check the branch name before pushing or opening a PR.
  • Use Conventional Commit PR titles (<type>: <summary>) as required by .coderabbit.yaml and the prepare-pr skill; reserve fix for actual product bugs, not CI, docs, or chores.
  • Use signed-off commits for PR work: git commit -s.
  • When creating a pull request from the current branch, target the upstream repository rather than a fork.
  • Before creating, opening, publishing, or editing a pull request, read .github/pull_request_template.md and use it as the PR body skeleton (or gh pr create --template .github/pull_request_template.md). Preserve its visible headings (Overview, Where should the reviewer start?, Related Issues) and its contribution checkboxes; fill the sections instead of replacing them with a generic summary.
  • If repo-local PR guidance such as the prepare-pr skill conflicts with generic GitHub connector or plugin guidance, follow the repo-local PR guidance for PR body format and review handoff details.
  • PR descriptions should include what changed, why, how it was tested, and any breaking changes within the repository template format.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.