agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/NeMo-Fabric/.agents/skills/create-release-tag/SKILL.md

create-release-tag

Skill73 starsChanged 58 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create and push a signed, annotated NeMo Fabric stable release tag, then prepare unpublished GitHub Release and team announcement drafts for review. Use when cutting a stable release tag; not for beta or release-candidate tags.

  • Commits and pushes

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the remaining commands in one noninteractive Bash session.

    line 37
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop on any failed check. Do not force-update, replace, or delete an existing local or remote tag.

    line 104
  3. Distinctive:

    After the tag push succeeds, create a draft GitHub Release for that exact tag.

    line 109
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not publish the release.

    line 110
  5. Distinctive:

    Read the tagged release-notes page so the draft describes the content that was actually released, not later working-tree edits:

    line 130
  6. Distinctive:

    Use GitHub's generated notes only to identify included pull requests and potential new contributors.

    line 147
  7. Distinctive:

    Use a temporary Markdown file with this exact structure:

    line 163
  8. Very specific:

    Create the .tmp directory if needed and save the announcement at the exact path .tmp/draft-${RELEASE_VERSION}release-announce.md:

    line 248
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not post or send the announcement as part of this skill.

    line 287

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Create a Release Tag

Require the user to provide the stable release version in exact <major>.<minor>.<patch> form. Do not infer it from package metadata or a branch name, and do not edit package metadata while creating the tag.

RELEASE_VERSION="<user-provided-major.minor.patch>"
if [[ ! "${RELEASE_VERSION}" =~ ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$ ]]; then
  echo "Error: release version must be <major>.<minor>.<patch>" >&2
  exit 1
fi
RELEASE_BRANCH="release/$(printf '%s' "${RELEASE_VERSION}" | cut -d. -f1,2)"
RELEASE_TAG="v${RELEASE_VERSION}"

if ! git ls-remote --exit-code --heads upstream "refs/heads/${RELEASE_BRANCH}" >/dev/null; then
  echo "Error: remote release branch ${RELEASE_BRANCH} does not exist on upstream" >&2
  exit 1
fi

git fetch upstream "${RELEASE_BRANCH}" --tags

Create and Verify the Tag

Assume upstream is the NVIDIA repository remote. Preserve user changes: do not stash, discard, or switch away from a dirty worktree. The remote release branch check must succeed before switching to the release branch.

Run the remaining commands in one noninteractive Bash session. Record the user's original checkout and install this exit trap before switching branches. The trap returns to the original named branch (or detached commit) after the workflow succeeds or encounters an error, but only if this workflow changed the checkout.

set -euo pipefail
ORIGINAL_BRANCH="$(git branch --show-current)"
ORIGINAL_HEAD="$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD)"
CHECKOUT_CHANGED=false

restore_checkout() {
  local outcome=$?
  trap - EXIT
  if [[ "${CHECKOUT_CHANGED}" == true ]]; then
    if [[ -n "${ORIGINAL_BRANCH}" ]]; then
      git switch "${ORIGINAL_BRANCH}" || outcome=1
    else
      git switch --detach "${ORIGINAL_HEAD}" || outcome=1
    fi
  fi
  exit "${outcome}"
}
trap restore_checkout EXIT

Require the selected release commit and package version to match upstream. Do not create the tag when either the local or upstream repository already has a tag with the exact release name.

if [[ "${ORIGINAL_BRANCH}" != "${RELEASE_BRANCH}" ]]; then
  git switch "${RELEASE_BRANCH}"
  CHECKOUT_CHANGED=true
fi
git pull --ff-only upstream "${RELEASE_BRANCH}"

test -z "$(git status --porcelain)"
RELEASE_SHA="$(git rev-parse HEAD)"
REMOTE_RELEASE_SHA="$(git rev-parse "upstream/${RELEASE_BRANCH}^{commit}")"
test "${RELEASE_SHA}" = "${REMOTE_RELEASE_SHA}"
test "$(just normalize-release-tag "${RELEASE_TAG}")" = "${RELEASE_VERSION}"
CURRENT_VERSION="$(python -c "import tomllib; print(tomllib.load(open('Cargo.toml', 'rb'))['workspace']['package']['version'])")"
test "${CURRENT_VERSION}" = "${RELEASE_VERSION}"

if git rev-parse --verify --quiet "refs/tags/${RELEASE_TAG}" >/dev/null; then
  echo "Error: local tag ${RELEASE_TAG} already exists" >&2
  exit 1
fi
if git ls-remote --exit-code --tags upstream "refs/tags/${RELEASE_TAG}" >/dev/null; then
  echo "Error: remote tag ${RELEASE_TAG} already exists" >&2
  exit 1
fi

git tag -s -a \
  -m "NVIDIA NeMo Fabric ${RELEASE_VERSION}" \
  "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  "${RELEASE_SHA}"

git tag -v "${RELEASE_TAG}"
git show "${RELEASE_TAG}"
test "$(git rev-parse "${RELEASE_TAG}^{commit}")" = "${RELEASE_SHA}"

git push upstream "refs/tags/${RELEASE_TAG}"

Stop on any failed check. Do not force-update, replace, or delete an existing local or remote tag.

Draft the GitHub Release

After the tag push succeeds, create a draft GitHub Release for that exact tag. Do not publish the release. Determine the previous release tag from GitHub's latest published, non-draft, non-prerelease release. Do not infer it from local tag ordering.

GITHUB_REPOSITORY="NVIDIA/NeMo-Fabric"
PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG="$(
  gh api "repos/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/releases/latest" --jq '.tag_name'
)"
test -n "${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}"
test "${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}" != "${RELEASE_TAG}"

if ! git rev-parse --verify --quiet "refs/tags/${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}" >/dev/null; then
  git fetch upstream "refs/tags/${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}:refs/tags/${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}"
fi

RELEASE_NOTES_URL="https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo/fabric/about-nemo-fabric/release-notes"
COMPARISON_URL="https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/compare/${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}...${RELEASE_TAG}"

Read the tagged release-notes page so the draft describes the content that was actually released, not later working-tree edits:

git show \
  "${RELEASE_TAG}:docs/about-nemo-fabric/release-notes.mdx"

Also gather the comparison evidence with the existing read-only helper:

python3 .agents/skills/draft-release-notes/scripts/collect_release_evidence.py \
  --previous "${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --current "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --version "${RELEASE_VERSION}"

Use GitHub's generated notes only to identify included pull requests and potential new contributors. Verify that evidence before including it; do not substitute the generated text for the curated release-notes page.

gh api --method POST \
  "repos/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/releases/generate-notes" \
  -f "tag_name=${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  -f "previous_tag_name=${PREVIOUS_RELEASE_TAG}"

Draft a condensed release body rather than reproducing the full release-notes page. Include only the highest-impact user-facing changes, keep each bullet brief, and use the detailed release-notes link for supporting context. Do not copy full paragraphs or exhaustive lists from the source page.

Use a temporary Markdown file with this exact structure:

# NVIDIA NeMo Fabric <version>

<One or two sentences summarizing the release.>

## At a Glance

### New

- <Notable new capability>

### Changed

- <Notable behavior or experience change>

### Breaking Changes

- **<Affected area>:** <What changed and what users must do.>
  [Migration details](<absolute-documentation-url>)

## Learn More

- [Detailed release notes](<absolute-documentation-url>)
- [Full changelog](<comparison-url>)

## New Contributors

- <Contributor and contribution>

Replace <version> with ${RELEASE_VERSION}, without the leading v. Derive the summary, New, Changed, and Breaking Changes content from the tagged docs/about-nemo-fabric/release-notes.mdx. Link migration items to the most specific absolute documentation URL available. Use ${RELEASE_NOTES_URL} for the detailed release-notes link and ${COMPARISON_URL} for both changelog links. List only verified first-time contributors from the comparison. Use - None. under any category with no applicable entries so every heading in the template remains present.

Review the completed body for unsupported claims, unresolved placeholders, and relative URLs. Then create and verify the draft. --verify-tag is required so GitHub cannot create a different tag implicitly. The title must be the exact tag name.

RELEASE_BODY_PATH="<temporary-markdown-file>"

if gh release view "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo "Error: a GitHub Release for ${RELEASE_TAG} already exists" >&2
  exit 1
fi

gh release create "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" \
  --draft \
  --title "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --notes-file "${RELEASE_BODY_PATH}" \
  --verify-tag

test "$(gh release view "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" \
  --json isDraft \
  --jq '.isDraft')" = "true"
test "$(gh release view "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
  --repo "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" \
  --json name \
  --jq '.name')" = "${RELEASE_TAG}"

DRAFT_EDIT_URL="https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/releases/edit/${RELEASE_TAG}"
printf 'Review the draft release before publishing: %s\n' "${DRAFT_EDIT_URL}"

Present ${DRAFT_EDIT_URL} to the user as a clickable link. Tell the user to review the title and body before clicking Publish release. Do not run gh release edit --draft=false, call the publish API, or otherwise publish the release as part of this skill.

Draft the Team Release Announcement

Draft an announcement suitable for a team communication platform. Make it shorter and more condensed than the GitHub Release body: use a one-line description and include only the most important features. Do not copy paragraphs, exhaustive lists, contributor details, or changelog details from the release notes.

Create the .tmp directory if needed and save the announcement at the exact path .tmp/draft-${RELEASE_VERSION}release-announce.md:

mkdir -p .tmp
ANNOUNCEMENT_PATH=".tmp/draft-${RELEASE_VERSION}release-announce.md"
TAGGED_RELEASE_NOTES_URL="https://github.com/${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/blob/${RELEASE_TAG}/docs/about-nemo-fabric/release-notes.mdx"

Use this structure:

:mega: NVIDIA NeMo Fabric <version> is here! :mega:

<short one-line description>

What’s new in <version>?
<!-- List the most important features here there should be 3-4 bullet points -->
* <emoji> <key feature>

<if there are breaking changes>
:warning: Breaking change: <change>
:warning: Breaking change: <change>
</if there are breaking changes>

Learn more and get started:

:book: Release Notes: <link to tagged release-notes.mdx file in GitHub>
:computer: GitHub: https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Fabric

Replace <version> with ${RELEASE_VERSION}, without the leading v, and use ${TAGGED_RELEASE_NOTES_URL} for the release-notes link. Select only the highest-impact features from the tagged release-notes page and give each a relevant emoji. Include one :warning: line per verified breaking change; omit the entire breaking-change block when there are none. Remove every placeholder before saving the file.

Present ${ANNOUNCEMENT_PATH} to the user together with ${DRAFT_EDIT_URL}. Do not post or send the announcement as part of this skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.