agentleFS
NCMFNNCMFN/ClaudeCode/.agents/skills/content-engine/SKILL.md

content-engine

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create platform-native content systems for X, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, newsletters, and repurposed multi-platform campaigns. Use when the user wants social posts, threads, scripts, content calendars, or one source asset adapted cleanly across platforms.

59 other projects use a version of this, 35 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brand-discovery, agent-sort and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ysyecustSkill

    brand-discovery

    Use when a brand needs to discover or articulate its identity through structured multi-session interviews. Covers purpose, positioning, audience, personality, voice, narrative, and founder-brand tension across 8 modules using laddering, 5 Whys, and projective techniques. Produces a resumable session with disk-persisted state and a master brandbook (90_SYNTHESIS.md).

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • niloykumarbarmanSkill

    agent-sort

    Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • royaluniondesign-sysSkill

    configure-ecc

    Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • junimnjwSkill

    ralphinho-rfc-pipeline

    RFC-driven multi-agent DAG execution pattern with quality gates, merge queues, and work unit orchestration.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • TironFoxSkill

    agent-payment-x402

    Add x402 payment execution to AI agents — per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets via MCP tools. Use when agents need to pay for APIs, services, or other agents.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • TironFoxSkill

    openclaw-persona-forge

    为 OpenClaw AI Agent 锻造完整的龙虾灵魂方案。根据用户偏好或随机抽卡, 输出身份定位、灵魂描述(SOUL.md)、角色化底线规则、名字和头像生图提示词。 如当前环境提供已审核的生图 skill,可自动生成统一风格头像图片。 当用户需要创建、设计或定制 OpenClaw 龙虾灵魂时使用。 不适用于:微调已有 SOUL.md、非 OpenClaw 平台的角色设计、纯工具型无性格 Agent。 触发词:龙虾灵魂、虾魂、OpenClaw 灵魂、养虾灵魂、龙虾角色、龙虾定位、 龙虾剧本杀角色、龙虾游戏角色、龙虾 NPC、龙虾性格、龙虾背景故事、 lobster soul、lobster character、抽卡、随机龙虾、龙虾 SOUL、gacha。

    Also in 5 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

25 rules. 3 are common, 21 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 3

    Common

    Most of the 50 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 21

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Start from source material, not generic post formulas.

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    No engagement bait unless the user explicitly asks for it.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Before drafting, identify the source set:

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing.

    line 38
  5. Very specific:

    If live X access is available, use x-api to pull recent original posts before drafting.

    line 49
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not start drafting until the voice profile is clear enough to enforce.

    line 61
  7. Distinctive:

    When the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, default to this unless newer examples clearly override it:

    line 65
  8. Distinctive:

    Delete and rewrite any of these:

    line 76
  9. Distinctive:

    keep the compression if the source voice is compressed

    line 94
  10. Distinctive:

    if writing a thread, each post must advance the argument

    line 95
  11. Distinctive:

    do not pad with context the audience does not need

    line 96
  12. Distinctive:

    do not turn it into a fake lesson post unless the source material actually is reflective

    line 101
  13. Distinctive:

    no corporate inspiration cadence

    line 102
  14. Distinctive:

    no praise-stacking, no "journey" filler

    line 103
  15. Distinctive:

    do not write narration that sounds better on paper than on screen

    line 109
  16. Distinctive:

    use chaptering only when it helps clarity

    line 115
  17. Distinctive:

    do not spend the first paragraph warming up

    line 120
  18. Distinctive:

    every section needs to add something new

    line 121
  19. Distinctive:

    Run the quality gate.

    line 131
  20. Common:

    When asked for a campaign, return:

    line 135
  21. Distinctive:

    every draft sounds like the intended author, not the platform stereotype

    line 145
  22. Distinctive:

    every draft contains a real claim, proof point, or concrete observation

    line 146
  23. Common:

    no generic hype language remains

    line 147
  24. Distinctive:

    no fake engagement bait remains

    line 148
  25. Common:

    no duplicated copy across platforms unless requested

    line 149

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 50 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Content Engine

Build platform-native content without flattening the author's real voice into platform slop.

When to Activate

  • writing X posts or threads
  • drafting LinkedIn posts or launch updates
  • scripting short-form video or YouTube explainers
  • repurposing articles, podcasts, demos, docs, or internal notes into public content
  • building a launch sequence or ongoing content system around a product, insight, or narrative

Non-Negotiables

  1. Start from source material, not generic post formulas.
  2. Adapt the format for the platform, not the persona.
  3. One post should carry one actual claim.
  4. Specificity beats adjectives.
  5. No engagement bait unless the user explicitly asks for it.

Source-First Workflow

Before drafting, identify the source set:

  • published articles
  • notes or internal memos
  • product demos
  • docs or changelogs
  • transcripts
  • screenshots
  • prior posts from the same author

If the user wants a specific voice, build a voice profile from real examples before writing.

Voice Capture Workflow

Collect 5 to 20 examples when available. Good sources:

  • articles or essays
  • X posts or threads
  • docs or release notes
  • newsletters
  • previous launch posts

If live X access is available, use x-api to pull recent original posts before drafting. If not, use the examples already provided or present in the repo.

Extract and write down:

  • sentence length and rhythm
  • how compressed or explanatory the writing is
  • whether capitalization is conventional, mixed, or situational
  • how parentheses are used
  • whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or abrupt pivots
  • how often the writer asks questions
  • how sharp, formal, opinionated, or dry the voice is
  • what the writer never does

Do not start drafting until the voice profile is clear enough to enforce.

Affaan / ECC Voice Reference

When the user wants Affaan / ECC voice specifically, default to this unless newer examples clearly override it:

  • direct, compressed, concrete
  • strong preference for specific claims, numbers, mechanisms, and receipts
  • parentheticals used to qualify, narrow, or over-clarify, not to do corny bits
  • lowercase is optional, not mandatory
  • questions are rare and should not be added as bait
  • transitions should feel earned, not polished
  • tone can be sharp or blunt, but should not sound like a content marketer

Hard Bans

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
  • "game-changer", "revolutionary", "cutting-edge"
  • "no fluff"
  • "not X, just Y"
  • "here's why this matters" unless it is followed immediately by something concrete
  • "Excited to share"
  • fake curiosity gaps
  • ending with a LinkedIn-style question just to farm replies
  • forced lowercase when the source voice does not call for it
  • forced casualness on LinkedIn
  • parenthetical jokes that were not present in the source voice

Platform Adaptation Rules

X

  • open with the strongest claim, artifact, or tension
  • keep the compression if the source voice is compressed
  • if writing a thread, each post must advance the argument
  • do not pad with context the audience does not need

LinkedIn

  • expand only enough for people outside the immediate niche to follow
  • do not turn it into a fake lesson post unless the source material actually is reflective
  • no corporate inspiration cadence
  • no praise-stacking, no "journey" filler

Short Video

  • script around the visual sequence and proof points
  • first seconds should show the result, problem, or punch
  • do not write narration that sounds better on paper than on screen

YouTube

  • show the result or tension early
  • organize by argument or progression, not filler sections
  • use chaptering only when it helps clarity

Newsletter

  • open with the point, conflict, or artifact
  • do not spend the first paragraph warming up
  • every section needs to add something new

Repurposing Flow

  1. Pick the anchor asset.
  2. Extract 3 to 7 atomic claims or scenes.
  3. Rank them by sharpness, novelty, and proof.
  4. Assign one strong idea per output.
  5. Adapt structure for each platform.
  6. Strip platform-shaped filler.
  7. Run the quality gate.

Deliverables

When asked for a campaign, return:

  • a short voice profile if voice matching matters
  • the core angle
  • platform-native drafts
  • posting order only if it helps execution
  • gaps that must be filled before publishing

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • every draft sounds like the intended author, not the platform stereotype
  • every draft contains a real claim, proof point, or concrete observation
  • no generic hype language remains
  • no fake engagement bait remains
  • no duplicated copy across platforms unless requested
  • any CTA is earned and user-approved

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.