agentleFS
NCMFNNCMFN/ClaudeCode/.agents/skills/article-writing/SKILL.md

article-writing

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter.

55 other projects use a version of this, 42 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use agent-sort, configure-ecc and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • niloykumarbarmanSkill

    agent-sort

    Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • royaluniondesign-sysSkill

    configure-ecc

    Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • royaluniondesign-sysSkill

    content-hash-cache-pattern

    Cache expensive file processing results using SHA-256 content hashes — path-independent, auto-invalidating, with service layer separation.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • junimnjwSkill

    ralphinho-rfc-pipeline

    RFC-driven multi-agent DAG execution pattern with quality gates, merge queues, and work unit orchestration.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • junimnjwSkill

    carrier-relationship-management

    Codified expertise for managing carrier portfolios, negotiating freight rates, tracking carrier performance, allocating freight, and maintaining strategic carrier relationships. Informed by transportation managers with 15+ years experience. Includes scorecarding frameworks, RFP processes, market intelligence, and compliance vetting. Use when managing carriers, negotiating rates, evaluating carrier performance, or building freight strategies.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 4 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 12

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view, not an LLM smoothing itself into paste.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep sentences tight unless the source voice is intentionally expansive.

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    Use proof instead of adjectives.

    line 23
  4. Common:

    Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:

    line 28
  6. Distinctive:

    If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:

    line 49
  8. Common:

    Delete and rewrite any of these:

    line 59
  9. Distinctive:

    Start sections with proof, artifact, conflict, or example.

    line 75
  10. Distinctive:

    use code, commands, screenshots, or concrete output in major sections

    line 84
  11. Common:

    start with tension, contradiction, or a specific observation

    line 89
  12. Common:

    keep one argument thread per section

    line 90
  13. Distinctive:

    keep the first screen doing real work

    line 95
  14. Distinctive:

    do not front-load diary filler

    line 96
  15. Distinctive:

    use section labels only when they improve scanability

    line 97
  16. Distinctive:

    every section adds something new

    line 105

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Article Writing

Write long-form content that sounds like an actual person with a point of view, not an LLM smoothing itself into paste.

When to Activate

  • drafting blog posts, essays, launch posts, guides, tutorials, or newsletter issues
  • turning notes, transcripts, or research into polished articles
  • matching an existing founder, operator, or brand voice from examples
  • tightening structure, pacing, and evidence in already-written long-form copy

Core Rules

  1. Lead with the concrete thing: artifact, example, output, anecdote, number, screenshot, or code.
  2. Explain after the example, not before.
  3. Keep sentences tight unless the source voice is intentionally expansive.
  4. Use proof instead of adjectives.
  5. Never invent facts, credibility, or customer evidence.

Voice Capture Workflow

If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of:

  • published articles
  • newsletters
  • X posts or threads
  • docs or memos
  • launch notes
  • a style guide

Then extract:

  • sentence length and rhythm
  • whether the writing is compressed, explanatory, sharp, or formal
  • how parentheses are used
  • how often the writer asks questions
  • whether the writer uses fragments, lists, or hard pivots
  • formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, pull quotes
  • what the writer clearly avoids

If no voice references are given, default to a sharp operator voice: concrete, unsentimental, useful.

Affaan / ECC Voice Reference

When matching Affaan / ECC voice, bias toward:

  • direct claims over scene-setting
  • high specificity
  • parentheticals used for qualification or over-clarification, not comedy
  • capitalization chosen situationally, not as a gimmick
  • very low tolerance for fake thought-leadership cadence
  • almost no bait questions

Banned Patterns

Delete and rewrite any of these:

  • "In today's rapidly evolving landscape"
  • "game-changer", "cutting-edge", "revolutionary"
  • "no fluff"
  • "not X, just Y"
  • "here's why this matters" as a standalone bridge
  • fake vulnerability arcs
  • a closing question added only to juice engagement
  • forced lowercase
  • corny parenthetical asides
  • biography padding that does not move the argument

Writing Process

  1. Clarify the audience and purpose.
  2. Build a hard outline with one job per section.
  3. Start sections with proof, artifact, conflict, or example.
  4. Expand only where the next sentence earns space.
  5. Cut anything that sounds templated, overexplained, or self-congratulatory.

Structure Guidance

Technical Guides

  • open with what the reader gets
  • use code, commands, screenshots, or concrete output in major sections
  • end with actionable takeaways, not a soft recap

Essays / Opinion

  • start with tension, contradiction, or a specific observation
  • keep one argument thread per section
  • make opinions answer to evidence

Newsletters

  • keep the first screen doing real work
  • do not front-load diary filler
  • use section labels only when they improve scanability

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • factual claims are backed by provided sources
  • generic AI transitions are gone
  • the voice matches the supplied examples
  • every section adds something new
  • formatting matches the intended medium

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.