web
Skill12 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Solve CTF web security challenges: SQL injection, XSS, authentication bypass, SSTI, path traversal, and source code audit. Use when given a URL, web app source code, or HTTP traffic. Triggers: .php .html .js files, "SQL injection", "XSS", "SSTI", "LFI", "RFI", "cookie", "JWT", "robots.txt", "directory enumeration", http:// or https:// targets. Tools: sqlmap, gobuster, ffuf, nikto, burpsuite. NOT for network packet analysis (use forensics).
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tpc-pascal/skillsmiththeir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- arch3rPro/ark-spacetheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- kjsa7412/claude_code_newslettertheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- jircdev/crew-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Boxline-dev/examplestheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- tyler-berggren/tb-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 7, 2026
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- Agents4Academia-AI/UReKA★ 9same name
- LocalKinAI/kinclaw★ 9same name
- Shad0wMazt3r/The-Scaffolding★ 3same name
- tyler-berggren/tb-claude-kit★ 2same name
- arch3rPro/ark-space★ 1same name
- Boxline-dev/examples★ 1same name
- jircdev/crew-plugin★ 1same name
- kjsa7412/claude_code_newsletter★ 1same name
- toannhu96/korean-interview-coach-skill★ 1same name
- tpc-pascal/skillsmith★ 1same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Use this command for challenges involving:
- Distinctive: line 60
Look for .git, .svn, backup files
- Distinctive: line 61
Test input fields for injection
- Very specific: line 77
When using /ctf-kit:team-solve with a web challenge, the lead spawns 3 specialists.
- Distinctive: line 79
All web teammates require plan approval: before sending requests to the target.
- Distinctive: line 96
Before any teammate sends a request to the target:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CTF Web
Analyze and solve web security challenges.
When to Use
Use this command for challenges involving:
- Web applications
- SQL injection
- XSS vulnerabilities
- Authentication bypass
- API exploitation
- Source code analysis
Bundled Scripts
- check-tools.sh — Verify required web tools are installed
- run-gobuster.sh — Directory enumeration with structured output. Outputs JSON with accessible paths, redirects, and forbidden paths.
Instructions
- First check tool availability:
bash scripts/check-tools.sh For directory/file enumeration (outputs structured JSON):
bash scripts/run-gobuster.sh http://target.com bash scripts/run-gobuster.sh http://target.com /path/to/wordlist.txt bash scripts/run-gobuster.sh http://target.com /path/to/wordlist.txt php,html,txtJSON output includes:
accessible: paths returning 200 (with size)redirects: paths returning 3xxforbidden: paths returning 403 (may indicate hidden content)suggestions: which paths to investigate
For SQL injection:
sqlmap -u "http://target.com/page?id=1" --dbs sqlmap -u "http://target.com/page?id=1" -D database -T table --dump- Manual testing checklist:
- Check robots.txt, sitemap.xml
- Look for .git, .svn, backup files
- Test input fields for injection
- Examine cookies and headers
- View page source
Common Vulnerabilities
| Vulnerability | Test Payload |
| SQL Injection | ' OR '1'='1 |
| XSS | <script>alert(1)</script> |
| Path Traversal | ../../../etc/passwd |
| SSTI | {{7*7}} or ${7*7} |
| Command Injection | ; id or | id |
Team Roles
When using /ctf-kit:team-solve with a web challenge, the lead spawns 3 specialists.
All web teammates require plan approval before sending requests to the target.
| Role | Teammate Name | Focus | Tools | First Action |
| Recon & Enumeration | web-recon | Directory scanning, technology fingerprinting, hidden paths, backup files, robots.txt, source code review | gobuster, ffuf, scripts/run-gobuster.sh, curl | Check robots.txt, run gobuster, view page source, identify tech stack |
| Injection | injection-tester | SQLi, XSS, SSTI, command injection, path traversal, SSRF, deserialization | sqlmap, manual payloads, curl | Map input fields, test with common payloads from the patterns table above |
| Auth & Logic | auth-analyst | JWT manipulation, session handling, IDOR, privilege escalation, business logic flaws, API abuse | jwt_tool, curl, burp | Inspect cookies/tokens, test auth bypass, enumerate API endpoints |
When to broadcast
- Recon: "Found admin panel at /admin" or "Technology: Flask with Jinja2 (SSTI likely)" — injection tester focuses there
- Injection: "SQLi confirmed on parameter X, dumping DB" — auth analyst checks for stored creds
- Auth: "JWT uses none algorithm" or "IDOR on user ID" — others test with escalated access
- Any: "Found the flag" — immediate broadcast, all stop
Plan approval flow
Before any teammate sends a request to the target:
- Teammate describes what they want to do and why
- Lead reviews for safety (no destructive actions, rate limiting)
- Lead approves or redirects
Example Usage
/ctf-kit:web ./webapp-source/
/ctf-kit:web http://challenge.ctf.comDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

