analyze
Skill12 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze CTF challenge files to detect category and suggest next steps. Use when starting a new challenge, receiving unknown files, or needing triage. Triggers: file, strings, xxd, binwalk output, unknown binaries, .bin .dat .raw .enc files, "what is this file", "analyze this", "identify challenge type". Routes to crypto/forensics/stego/web/pwn/ reverse/osint/misc skills based on detection.
70 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jhlee0409/proc-janitortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Beskars-Code/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Gabriel-Lafrance/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use constitution, revise and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ArvorCoSkillconstitution
Create or update the project constitution - personalized governance and coding principles. Use when starting a project or updating project standards. Triggers on: create constitution, update principles, set project rules.
Also in 4 projects that use this
stormlightlabsSkillrevise
Address review comments on an open pull request and push the fixes. Use for /edit, /revise, or when asked to respond to review feedback on a PR number.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DockerSkillwrite
Write or edit reader-facing technical prose for immediate comprehension. Use for documentation, PR titles and descriptions, release notes, design documents, user-facing explanations, and substantive comments. Also use when asked to make writing clearer, more natural, less AI-generated, or easier to read. For documentation fixes, handles edits, formatting, self-review, and commits after research identifies what to change. Do not use for code-only tasks with no prose deliverable.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 5 projects that use this
H-mmerSkillsubmit
Draft and submit a vulnerability report to the bug bounty platform. Reads scope.yaml for platform/program, uses brain + findings for content. Always drafts first for review.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillquality
Evaluates whether a GitHub issue is spam, empty, needs more information, or is OK to proceed.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from ArvorCo
Other versions70 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 70
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex★ 34ksame name
- oxsecurity/megalinter★ 2.6ksame name
- H-mmer/pentest-agents★ 815same name
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tool★ 432same name
- hardisgroupcom/sfdx-hardis★ 432same name
- nwiizo/tfmcp★ 373same name
- hsantanna88/clo-author★ 262same name
- hugosantanna/clo-author★ 262same name
- ansvisor/ansvisor★ 233same name
60 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 60 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Use this command when you have new challenge files and need to:
- Very specific: line 74
All scripts produce a === PARSED RESULTS (JSON) === section with structured data.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 60 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CTF Analyze
Analyze challenge files to determine type and suggest approaches.
When to Use
Use this command when you have new challenge files and need to:
- Identify the challenge category (crypto, forensics, stego, web, pwn, reversing, OSINT, misc)
- Detect file types and formats
- Get initial suggestions for tools to use
- Understand what you're working with
Bundled Scripts
- check-tools.sh — Verify required analysis tools are installed
- triage.sh — Multi-step triage pipeline: file type → strings → binwalk → category suggestion. Produces a JSON summary with detected category, confidence score, and recommended next skill.
- run-strings.sh — Extract strings with pattern detection (flags, URLs, hashes, credentials). Outputs JSON with categorized findings.
Instructions
- First check tool availability:
bash scripts/check-tools.sh Recommended: Run the full triage pipeline for automatic category detection:
bash scripts/triage.sh $ARGUMENTSThe triage script chains: file → strings → binwalk → exiftool, then outputs a JSON summary including:
category: detected challenge type (crypto, forensics, stego, etc.)confidence: detection confidence (0-100%)suggested_skill: which/ctf-kit:*command to use nextfindings: flags, URLs, hashes, base64 strings foundembedded_signatures: files hidden inside the challenge file
For strings-only analysis with pattern detection:
bash scripts/run-strings.sh $ARGUMENTSOr run the CLI analysis:
ctf analyze $ARGUMENTS- Read the JSON output at the end of each script. It contains structured data you can use to decide next steps. The
suggestionsfield tells you exactly what to do next. - Based on the triage results, use the recommended skill:
/ctf-kit:cryptofor cryptography challenges/ctf-kit:forensicsfor forensics challenges/ctf-kit:stegofor steganography challenges/ctf-kit:webfor web security challenges/ctf-kit:pwnfor binary exploitation challenges/ctf-kit:reversefor reverse engineering challenges/ctf-kit:osintfor OSINT challenges/ctf-kit:miscfor miscellaneous challenges
Output Format
All scripts produce a === PARSED RESULTS (JSON) === section with structured data. Key fields:
| Field | Description |
category | Detected challenge category |
confidence | Detection confidence (0.0-1.0) |
suggested_skill | Which skill to invoke next |
findings.flags | Any flags found in strings |
suggestions | Actionable next steps |
Example Usage
/ctf-kit:analyze challenge.bin
/ctf-kit:analyze ./challenge-folder/Related Commands
/ctf-kit:crypto- Crypto-specific analysis/ctf-kit:forensics- Forensics analysis/ctf-kit:stego- Steganography analysis
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

