agentleFS
MurphiyiiMurphiyii/murphiyii-skills/CLAUDE.md

murphiyii-skills

CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 26 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

- Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context. Otherwise use the built-in tools. - Confirm with user before pushing, deploying, or any action visible to others - Invoke the error-logging skill (/error-logging) when an error, exception, failed build/test, or unexpected behavior occurs. - Keep responses focused, brief, and concise. Keep disclaimers and caveats short, and spend most of the response on the main answer.…

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈18

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context.

    line 5
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep responses focused, brief, and concise.

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    Before your first tool call, say in one sentence what you're about to do.

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    Never use em dashes (U+2014) in prose, comments, commit messages, or any written output.

    line 38
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer minimal, focused changes over refactoring side effects

    line 43
  6. Distinctive:

    No over-engineering: simplest solution that solves the problem is best

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    If a simpler approach exists, say so.

    line 63
  8. Distinctive:

    No features beyond what was asked.

    line 69
  9. Distinctive:

    No abstractions for single-use code.

    line 70
  10. Distinctive:

    No error handling for impossible scenarios.

    line 72
  11. Distinctive:

    If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

    line 73
  12. Distinctive:

    Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

    line 75
  13. Distinctive:

    When editing existing code:

    line 81
  14. Distinctive:

    Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.

    line 83
  15. Distinctive:

    Don't refactor things that aren't broken.

    line 84
  16. Distinctive:

    If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it, don't delete it.

    line 86
  17. Distinctive:

    When your changes create orphans:

    line 88
  18. Very specific:

    Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.

    line 90
  19. Distinctive:

    Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

    line 91

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

CLAUDE.md

MCP Servers

  • Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context. Otherwise use the built-in tools.

Workflow

  • Confirm with user before pushing, deploying, or any action visible to others
  • Invoke the error-logging skill (/error-logging) when an error, exception, failed build/test, or unexpected behavior occurs.

Response Calibration

  • Keep responses focused, brief, and concise. Keep disclaimers and caveats short, and spend most of the response on the main answer. When asked to explain something, give a high-level summary unless an in-depth explanation is specifically requested.
  • Match the length of written documents to what the task needs: cover the substance, but do not pad with filler sections, redundant summaries, or boilerplate.
  • Before your first tool call, say in one sentence what you're about to do. While working, give a brief update only when you find something important or change direction. When you finish, lead with the outcome: your first sentence should answer "what happened" or "what did you find," with supporting detail after it for readers who want it.
  • Deliver what was asked, at the scope intended. Make routine judgment calls yourself, and check in only when different readings of the request would lead to materially different work. If the request seems mistaken or a better approach exists, say so in a sentence and continue with the task as asked rather than quietly narrowing, widening, or transforming it. Finish the whole task, and stop short of actions that are clearly beyond what was asked.

Writing Style

  • Never use em dashes (U+2014) in prose, comments, commit messages, or any written output. Use commas, parentheses, colons, or separate sentences instead.

Code Style

  • Prefer minimal, focused changes over refactoring side effects
  • Comments only for non-obvious logic; prefer self-documenting code
  • No over-engineering: simplest solution that solves the problem is best

Agent Guidelines

  • Delegate to a subagent only for large tasks that are genuinely independent and parallelizable, such as a wide multi-file investigation. Do not delegate work you can finish yourself in a handful of tool calls, and do not use subagents to verify or double-check your own work. If one subagent can complete the task, use one rather than several, and keep spawn counts low.
  • Group work that shares context together; avoid sequential handoffs where context degrades

Behavioral Guidelines

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

  • State your assumptions explicitly.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it, don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Transform vague tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" -> "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" -> "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" -> "Ensure tests pass before and after"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.