murphiyii-skills
CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 26 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
- Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context. Otherwise use the built-in tools. - Confirm with user before pushing, deploying, or any action visible to others - Invoke the error-logging skill (/error-logging) when an error, exception, failed build/test, or unexpected behavior occurs. - Keep responses focused, brief, and concise. Keep disclaimers and caveats short, and spend most of the response on the main answer.…
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- angular-expertSkill
- animejsSkill
- error-loggingSkill
- goalifySkill
- handoffSkill
- premortemSkill
- prompt-builderSkill
- vanilla-web-architectureSkill
- writing-clearly-and-conciselySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈18
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 5
Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context.
- Distinctive: line 16
Keep responses focused, brief, and concise.
- Distinctive: line 23
Before your first tool call, say in one sentence what you're about to do.
- Distinctive: line 38
Never use em dashes (U+2014) in prose, comments, commit messages, or any written output.
- Distinctive: line 43
Prefer minimal, focused changes over refactoring side effects
- Distinctive: line 45
No over-engineering: simplest solution that solves the problem is best
- Distinctive: line 63
If a simpler approach exists, say so.
- Distinctive: line 69
No features beyond what was asked.
- Distinctive: line 70
No abstractions for single-use code.
- Distinctive: line 72
No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- Distinctive: line 73
If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
- Distinctive: line 75
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
- Distinctive: line 81
When editing existing code:
- Distinctive: line 83
Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Distinctive: line 84
Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Distinctive: line 86
If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it, don't delete it.
- Distinctive: line 88
When your changes create orphans:
- Very specific: line 90
Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Distinctive: line 91
Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CLAUDE.md
MCP Servers
- Use an MCP tool when it would give you something the built-in tools can't: real browser state, live data, or richer project context. Otherwise use the built-in tools.
Workflow
- Confirm with user before pushing, deploying, or any action visible to others
- Invoke the
error-loggingskill (/error-logging) when an error, exception, failed build/test, or unexpected behavior occurs.
Response Calibration
- Keep responses focused, brief, and concise. Keep disclaimers and caveats short, and spend most of the response on the main answer. When asked to explain something, give a high-level summary unless an in-depth explanation is specifically requested.
- Match the length of written documents to what the task needs: cover the substance, but do not pad with filler sections, redundant summaries, or boilerplate.
- Before your first tool call, say in one sentence what you're about to do. While working, give a brief update only when you find something important or change direction. When you finish, lead with the outcome: your first sentence should answer "what happened" or "what did you find," with supporting detail after it for readers who want it.
- Deliver what was asked, at the scope intended. Make routine judgment calls yourself, and check in only when different readings of the request would lead to materially different work. If the request seems mistaken or a better approach exists, say so in a sentence and continue with the task as asked rather than quietly narrowing, widening, or transforming it. Finish the whole task, and stop short of actions that are clearly beyond what was asked.
Writing Style
- Never use em dashes (U+2014) in prose, comments, commit messages, or any written output. Use commas, parentheses, colons, or separate sentences instead.
Code Style
- Prefer minimal, focused changes over refactoring side effects
- Comments only for non-obvious logic; prefer self-documenting code
- No over-engineering: simplest solution that solves the problem is best
Agent Guidelines
- Delegate to a subagent only for large tasks that are genuinely independent and parallelizable, such as a wide multi-file investigation. Do not delegate work you can finish yourself in a handful of tool calls, and do not use subagents to verify or double-check your own work. If one subagent can complete the task, use one rather than several, and keep spawn counts low.
- Group work that shares context together; avoid sequential handoffs where context degrades
Behavioral Guidelines
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
- State your assumptions explicitly.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it, don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Transform vague tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" -> "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" -> "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" -> "Ensure tests pass before and after"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

