Jarvis-Sub-Agent-Dashboard
CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- defuddleSkill
- json-canvasSkill
- mcp-maintainerSkill
- obsidian-basesSkill
- obsidian-cliSkill
- obsidian-markdownSkill
- release-guardSkill
- repo-onboardingSkill
- debug-live-issueSkill
- mcp-operationsSkill
- repo-onboardingSkill
- ship-featureSkill
- update-project-docsSkill
The file
We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 6
Keep MCP integration production-ready for local use (mcp/).
- Distinctive: line 16
Prefer minimal, reversible diffs.
- Distinctive: line 17
Never silently weaken safety controls around destructive actions.
- Distinctive: line 18
Keep docs updated when behavior, commands, file locations, or workflows change.
- Distinctive: line 33
If you cannot run a verification step, state exactly what was not run and why.
- Very specific: line 45
Use file-specific rules in .claude/rules/ when working in scoped areas.
- Very specific: line 46
Use project skills from .claude/skills/ for repeatable workflows.
- Very specific: line 47
Use .claude/agents/ subagents for focused review or investigation passes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Claude Code Working Guide
Project mission
- Maintain a reliable local-first dashboard for Claude Code session monitoring.
- Preserve real-time behavior (hooks -> API -> SQLite -> WebSocket -> UI).
- Keep MCP integration production-ready for local use (
mcp/).
Repo map
server/: Express API, hook ingestion, SQLite access, websocket broadcast (includes optional git upstream checks androutes/updates.js, pluslib/workflow-ingest.jswhich ingests on-disk Workflow-tool run journals - fleets that emit no hooks).client/: React + Vite UI.scripts/: hook installer/handler, import, seed, cleanup utilities,self-update-restart.js(pull → setup → restart).mcp/: local MCP server exposing dashboard operations as tools.
Non-negotiable engineering rules
- Preserve existing behavior unless explicitly asked to change it.
- Prefer minimal, reversible diffs.
- Never silently weaken safety controls around destructive actions.
- Keep docs updated when behavior, commands, file locations, or workflows change.
Commands you should know
- Setup:
npm run setup - Dev:
npm run dev - Prod build/start:
npm run buildthennpm start - Server tests:
npm run test:server - Client tests:
npm run test:client - MCP install/build/start:
npm run mcp:install,npm run mcp:build,npm run mcp:start - MCP typecheck:
npm run mcp:typecheck
Testing and verification policy
- Backend changes: run
npm run test:serverbefore finishing. - Frontend changes: run
npm run test:clientwhen relevant. This includes per-screen render snapshots (client/src/pages/__tests__/screens.snapshot.test.tsx). If a UI change is intentional, review the snapshot diff and regenerate baselines withcd client && npx vitest run -u; never blindly update snapshots to make tests pass. - MCP changes: run
npm run mcp:typecheckandnpm run mcp:build. - If you cannot run a verification step, state exactly what was not run and why.
Change guidelines by area
- API routes: preserve response shapes unless change is requested and documented.
- Database: avoid schema changes without migration-safe logic.
- Hooks: keep fail-safe and non-blocking behavior.
- WebSocket: keep message types stable and backward-compatible.
- Documentation: include exact commands and paths; keep markdown examples runnable.
Agent behavior
- Explore first, then implement.
- For larger tasks, propose/check a short plan before broad edits.
- Use file-specific rules in
.claude/rules/when working in scoped areas. - Use project skills from
.claude/skills/for repeatable workflows. - Use
.claude/agents/subagents for focused review or investigation passes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

