agentleFS
MrZarrarMrZarrar/Jarvis-Sub-Agent-Dashboard/.claude/skills/debug-live-issue/SKILL.md

debug-live-issue

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Debug production-like issues in this repository with disciplined evidence gathering. Use when fixing failing workflows, regressions, flaky behavior, or data inconsistencies across hooks, API, DB, websocket, and UI.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this workflow for incident-style debugging.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer direct logs, API responses, DB state checks, and deterministic repro steps.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Avoid speculative fixes without root-cause evidence.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    If not fully reproducible, state uncertainty and strongest hypothesis.

    line 20

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debug Live Issue

Use this workflow for incident-style debugging.

Steps

  • Capture symptom, expected behavior, and reproducible path.
  • Isolate subsystem first: hook ingestion, API route, DB state, websocket, or UI rendering.
  • Reproduce with minimal surface area.
  • Prove root cause before changing code.
  • Apply minimal fix and re-verify.

Evidence standards

  • Prefer direct logs, API responses, DB state checks, and deterministic repro steps.
  • Avoid speculative fixes without root-cause evidence.
  • If not fully reproducible, state uncertainty and strongest hypothesis.

References

  • Investigation template: references/investigation-template.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.