capture-observation
Skill10 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Append one observation, question, hypothesis, or concern to TASK_STATE.md as lean, append-only task memory, leaving other artifacts and work undisturbed. Use when something surfaces mid-work, a hypothesis needs logging, or a concern is too small for decision-interview or targeted-questions. Do not use for a decision (use decision-interview or sync-task-state), a new direction (use direction-adjust), multi-artifact changes (use state-reconcile), or with no task (run task-init).
In this repository98 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-auditSkill
- ai-feature-eval-harnessSkill
- api-contract-reviewSkill
- api-runtime-verifySkill
- apply-sweep-triageSkill
- approve-planSkill
- approve-proposedSkill
- app-runtime-verifySkill
- atom-audit-fleetSkill
- atom-auditSkill
- autonomous-boardSkill
- autonomous-readinessSkill
- autonomous-runSkill
- backend-system-designSkill
- branch-commitSkill
- capture-referencesSkill
- code-context-mapSkill
- code-locateSkill
- color-contrast-architectSkill
- compact-task-memorySkill
- component-specSkill
- contract-signoffSkill
- db-context-postgresSkill
- db-context-supabaseSkill
- decision-interviewSkill
- delivery-assetSkill
- design-bootstrapSkill
- design-spec-reviewSkill
- direction-adjustSkill
- external-research-fleetSkill
- external-researchSkill
- extract-foundations-from-screensSkill
- feature-library-scout-fleetSkill
- feature-library-scoutSkill
- foundation-auditSkill
- frontend-architecture-reviewSkill
- frontend-system-designSkill
- godot-runtime-verifySkill
- godot-scene-planSkill
- graphql-contract-reviewSkill
- harvest-session-learningsSkill
- image-to-specSkill
- impact-analysisSkill
- implement-approved-sliceSkill
- implementation-planSkill
- implement-fleetSkill
- implement-slice-complementSkill
- im-stuckSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- invariants-and-non-goalsSkill
- inventory-snapshotSkill
- journey-mapSkill
- jtbd-switch-interviewerSkill
- mcp-server-vetSkill
- migration-safety-stewardSkill
- pattern-docSkill
- performance-budgetSkill
- portfolio-reviewSkill
- post-deploy-verifierSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Read these sections in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md first:
- Distinctive: line 31
Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Distinctive: line 44
Do not implement production code.
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not interpret, paraphrase, or expand the observation.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not trigger reasoning, analysis, or follow-up questions.
- Very specific: line 58
Use a dated bullet format: - [YYYY-MM-DD] [<tag>] <observation>.
- Very specific: line 59
Treat task-memory write policy per WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md: write the file and mark it APPLIED.
- Distinctive: line 86
Do NOT rebuild the helper by writing each section out as its own file to hash it separately.
- Very specific: line 111
Default for this command: APPLIED append on TASK_STATE.md only.
- Very specific: line 120
Only TASK_STATE.md is touched.
- Very specific: line 124
Before declaring this output done, confirm it satisfies the shared Definition of done (command outputs) and Gate conditions in …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Act as a senior/staff engineering observation capture for the active engineering task.
Goal:
Capture a single observation, question, hypothesis, or concern that surfaced during work into TASK_STATE.md so it is preserved as task memory without breaking flow or requiring a full state sync.
Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):
- Read these sections in
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdfirst:## LLM execution contract## Editor mode policy(mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded inwos/editor-mode-mappings.mdand needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)## Global output contract(including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
- Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (
branch-commit,what-next,where-we-at,slice-closure,compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequencyimplement-approved-sliceandsync-task-state(v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of## Cross-cutting workflow guardrailsskipped:### External web access (centralized)and### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including### Proposal vs approved persistenceand### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcilestays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric. - Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.mdhas not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line:Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output. - Resolving the spec and
wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs:~/.claude/workflow-docs(CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR),~/.cursor/workflow-docs(WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project.cursor/workflow-docson project installs),~/.codex/workflow-docs(CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or<kimi-home>/workflow-docs(KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home:KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing~/.kimi-code, else existing~/.kimi, default~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync. - Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
- Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
- Official next-command names only: recommendations, including
Run now, use registered names fromcommands/<name>.mdorcommands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases.Run now: nonewithMode: N/Aends only if no honest next step exists, defined under### Official command names (routing integrity)(ADR-0126). Required inputs: - active task folder path
- TASK_STATE.md (must already exist)
- the observation itself (one to three lines, free form)
- optional: tag classifying the observation (
question|hypothesis|concern|note)
Task repository files to update:
- TASK_STATE.md (append-only,
## Observationsand no other section)
Operating rules:
- Do not implement production code.
- Do not interpret, paraphrase, or expand the observation. Capture verbatim with light formatting.
- Do not trigger reasoning, analysis, or follow-up questions. The point of this command is fast capture, not exploration.
- Handoff: end with the adaptive
### Handoffblock perWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md## Global output contract(Mode A compact or Mode B full). DefaultRun now: read TASK_STATE.mdLast completed stepandRecommended next stepto infer; if unclear, default towhat-next. Substrate write protocol (per ADR-0034, K.2 2026-06-04 -- dogfood). MANDATORY for every write to
TASK_STATE.md ## Observations(capture-observation is the OWNER perwos/substrate-peers.md; this is the only true append-only freeform section in the matrix). Percommands/_shared/substrate-write-protocol.md ## Concrete computation:- Compute
sha_beforevia the canonicalsha_of_sectionbash helper (nullONLY on the first observation captured in this task; subsequent appends compute against the existing section bytes). - Insert OR REPLACE the transaction header on its own line IMMEDIATELY above the
## Observationsheading:<!-- wos:write owner=capture-observation section='## Observations' run_id=<ULID-or-uuid> ts=<ISO-8601-ms-with-Z> reason=obs-<short-tag> mode=applied -->. Each capture-observation run replaces the prior header with this run's header (prior gets logged with event=overwrite per the same-owner double-write rule inwos/substrate-peers.md ## Conflict resolution). - Append the new dated bullet to the section content per the canonical format:
- [YYYY-MM-DD] [<tag>] <observation text>. Never edit prior bullets. - Compute
sha_aftervia the same helper against the post-write section bytes. - Append exactly one JSON line to
active/<task>/.wos/VERIFICATION_LOG.jsonlper the 14-field schema inwos/substrate-peers.md ## Audit trail.sha_afterMUST be valid SHA-256 hex (64 lowercase hex chars) -- NEVERnullon applied writes per K.5 validator.sha_beforeisnullONLY on the first observation captured for the task. - capture-observation writes exactly ONE section per invocation (
## Observations). The protocol does not multi-section here.
FORBIDDEN: half-compliant pattern (JSONL emitted but inline header omitted, OR
sha_afternull on applied write). K.4 drift-guard at next sweep Pre-flight will surface this command's writes if it skips the protocol.- Compute
- The target is always
## Observations, never## Open questions / blockers: that section belongs to other owners inwos/substrate-peers.md, and an observation routed there becomes a blocker nobody raised. WHENTASK_STATE.mdhas no## Observationssection, create it as the LAST section of the file. Two agents placing this section differently is the drift this rule exists to close. - Use a dated bullet format:
- [YYYY-MM-DD] [<tag>] <observation>. Example:- [2026-05-10] [question] should we cache the verification result client-side or always re-fetch? - Treat task-memory write policy per
WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md: write the file and mark itAPPLIED. - This command must not modify any other section of
TASK_STATE.md(no work complexity changes, no recommended next step changes, no last completed step changes). - Output is intentionally minimal. Do not produce analysis, framing, or recommendations beyond the capture itself.
- Durable preference pointer (P2-3, careers-page dogfooding 2026-06-23): the
## Observationssection is task memory that no other command reads back. IF the captured item is a durable cross-command preference (a staging, base-branch, commit, or PR-template convention that a later command should honor), still capture it here verbatim, but add a one-line pointer that it belongs inTASK_PREFERENCES.md(which delivery commands consume; its shape istemplates/TASK_PREFERENCES.md). Do not writeTASK_PREFERENCES.mdyourself; this command stays single-section and append-only.
Required output:
- The observation as it will be appended (verbatim with applied dating and tag formatting).
- The exact line(s) being added to
TASK_STATE.md. - The location in
TASK_STATE.mdwhere they will be inserted (existing section vs new section). - Reminder that no other state changed.
- Recommended next command (typically the command the user was running before this capture, or
what-nextif unclear). - Recommended editor mode for that next command.
- Why that is the correct next step (one line; default rationale: "resume the work that was in progress before this observation was captured").
Substrate digest fallback
Digest fallback when the canonical helper is unreachable. sha_of_section extracts a section's body with awk and pipes it to shasum -a 256. A run inside a permission boundary that admits shasum but refuses awk and sed cannot invoke that helper, and MUST NOT reimplement it. Assume the helper is unreachable whenever the workflow repository's scripts/ directory is not readable from the working directory.
WHERE the canonical per-section digest helper is unreachable, the write SHALL use a whole-file SHA-256 and SHALL declare the reduced scope:
# One call per file. Read the hash (the first field) out of the output;
# do not pipe it through `cut` or `awk` to trim it.
shasum -a 256 TASK_STATE.mdThen add "sha_scope":"file" to that JSONL line, so a validator distinguishes a file digest from a section digest. The rest of the protocol is unchanged: the transaction header still goes above the section heading, and there is exactly one JSONL line per section write.
Do NOT rebuild the helper by writing each section out as its own file to hash it separately.
At file scope two sections written in the same run share a digest, so the sha_scope field is mandatory, not optional.
Claim grounding (active epistemic humility)
Claim grounding (active epistemic humility). This block governs what you may assert and how you record it. It is keyed to the substrate section you are writing, not to which command is running, and it is INERT on any output that writes none of the claim-bearing sections below. Full contract and rationale: wos/active-epistemic-humility.md.
- When this applies. This block fires ONLY while you are writing a claim-bearing substrate section:
TASK_STATE.md ## Current known facts,## Risks to watch,## Observations,## Active files in scope,## Canonical decisions;DECISIONS.md ## Locked decisions;IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md ## Current gaps,## Risks and mitigations;IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md;EXTERNAL_RESEARCH.md;REFERENCES.md; or any section whose content is a statement a later command or a human decision will act on. WHEN your output writes none of these, this block imposes nothing: skip it and proceed. This is the D-13 inert clause; a fully-grounded or claim-free output pays nothing. - The unit is the load-bearing claim. A load-bearing claim is one a downstream command or a human decision consumes. A passing aside is not load-bearing; a statement someone will act on is. Apply the rest of this block per load-bearing claim, not per sentence.
- Ground it or abstain. Before you assert a load-bearing claim, trace it to the enumerable grounded set: a captured
REFERENCES.mdentry, a file read in this session, command output actually seen, or a passing deterministic gate. A claim supported only by model memory is OUTSIDE the grounded set, including when you are right, because that support is not observable. WHEN a load-bearing claim falls outside the set, do NOT assert it: either investigate until it is grounded, or abstain per rule 6. - Status records provenance, never confidence. WHERE you attach an epistemic status to a claim, the status names WHERE THE CLAIM CAME FROM: a
REFERENCES.mdentry title, a file path plus line, or the gate output it came from. It SHALL NOT express a degree of certainty. Do NOT add a confidence field, a numeric threshold, or a self-assessment prompt anywhere; a self-reported confidence signal is not a usable control signal (wos/active-epistemic-humility.mdPart 1.3). A status whose referent slot is empty is read as UNKNOWN, not as a weak yes. - Persisted claims carry the status; chat-only claims carry it when they route. Every load-bearing claim you write into a task-memory artifact carries its provenance referent, and that referent travels with the claim so a later command reads it too; do not drop it at the write boundary. A load-bearing claim that appears only in a chat-turn output carries a status only when it crosses the grounding boundary and triggers a route (an abstention, an escalation).
- Abstain as a routed continuation, never a bare refusal. WHEN you abstain, name the specific investigation that would settle the question AND route to the command that runs it (
capture-references,code-locate,incident-triage, or the fitting one). A withholding that stalls the work is invalid output. Abstention is distinct fromNO_OP:NO_OPmeans there is no work to do; abstention means there is work and the grounding to do it is missing. - An unfired gate is not evidence. The absence of a fired check does not mean grounding existed. Do not read silence here as a pass.
Standard output layout (required)
Produce the command output using this structure (English only):
Artifact changes
- List files in the task repository that would change, or
None. - For each file, mark
APPLIED/PROPOSED/SKIPand follow the task-memory write policy inWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md(task memory isAPPLIEDin every mode; a section this command does not own gets a<!-- PROPOSED by <command>: ... -->block for its owner, ADR-0034). - Default for this command:
APPLIEDappend onTASK_STATE.mdonly.
Command transcript
Brief audit trail (max 3 lines; max 2 in no-op runs with NO_OP_TRACE).
Handoff
Use the adaptive ending format of WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Global output contract. Every Handoff is one fenced text block with all four lines, Run now:, Mode:, Work complexity: and Reason:, on a stop and on a refusal too; the terminal form is Run now: none with Mode: N/A. A new Mode:, a model or a fresh session is never a stop, an offered choice is one, and Reason: names a role, never a model.
Definition of done (command output)
- Observation appended verbatim with date and optional tag formatting; no paraphrase or expansion.
- Only
TASK_STATE.mdis touched; no changes toLast completed step,Recommended next step,Work complexity, or any other section beyond the observation insertion. Artifact changesmarks the patch asAPPLIED.Handoffblock is complete per the adaptive format inWORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md## Global output contract; ending after the artifact change without a Handoff is invalid output.Run nowdefaults to the work the user was performing before this capture; if unrecoverable, usewhat-next.- Before declaring this output done, confirm it satisfies the shared Definition of done (command outputs) and Gate conditions in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md.
Quality bar: Optimize for speed of capture, fidelity to the user's wording, minimal disruption to in-progress work, and resumability of whatever the user was doing before triggering capture.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

