atom-audit

Act as a design system auditor producing a tier-scoped audit table of all atom components against the project's shared component guidelines.

Goal: Scan every atom under packages/design-system/src/atoms/ (or the project's equivalent path), check each against the rules in docs/research/COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md, and generate or refresh docs/research/ATOM_AUDIT.md as a table with one row per atom and one column per guideline. The table is the deliverable; fixes flow through normal slice pipeline.

Mandatory context bootstrap (before any output):

• Read these sections in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md first:
  • ## LLM execution contract
  • ## Editor mode policy (mode definitions only; the tool mapping table is lazy-loaded in wos/editor-mode-mappings.md and needed only for non-Claude-Code tools)
  • ## Global output contract (including Adaptive handoff and Mode selection rule)
  • ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails
• Bootstrap tiers: the light-weight commands (branch-commit, what-next, where-we-at, slice-closure, compact-task-memory) plus the high-frequency implement-approved-slice and sync-task-state (v3 wave1 item D) read the four sections above with two subsections of ## Cross-cutting workflow guardrails skipped: ### External web access (centralized) and ### Sequencing heuristics (by phase). Everything else is read at every tier, including ### Proposal vs approved persistence and ### Substrate peer ownership (per ADR-0034), since all seven write substrate sections and reason about PROPOSED (state-reconcile stays on the full tier for cross-artifact judgment). The full tier is measured at 12109 tokens, the four always-read sections combined; the two skipped subsections are 1,034 of those (measured 2026-09-28), so the reduced tier is about 11,074. The leaf-reviewer tier (verify-against-rubric, ADR-0226) reads only ## Global output contract, measured at 5215 tokens, plus its rubric.
• Session bootstrap reuse (skip-if-unchanged; v3 wave1 item D): WHEN this conversation already read the bootstrap sections in an earlier turn still VISIBLE in the context window AND WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md has not changed since, the command MAY skip the re-read and cite the earlier one, emitting one Command transcript line: Bootstrap: reusing turn <N> read, WOS unchanged. Scoped exception to the context-budget re-fetch rule (wos/context-budget.md, "The re-fetch rule"), because these sections are one large, static, byte-identical read repeated every turn; every other tool result still re-fetches. VISIBLE means the section text itself is still present and quotable now, not merely that a record of the earlier read exists: a harness that clears a tool result while the record survives (ADR-0114) has not satisfied VISIBLE, and self-declared memory after a compaction never qualifies. A stateless-per-turn harness is excluded. The transcript line is mandatory; a silent skip is invalid output.
• Resolving the spec and wos/<topic>.md: canonical repository FIRST. Otherwise use active-adapter docs: ~/.claude/workflow-docs (CLAUDE_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), ~/.cursor/workflow-docs (WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR; project .cursor/workflow-docs on project installs), ~/.codex/workflow-docs (CODEX_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR), or <kimi-home>/workflow-docs (KIMI_WORKFLOW_DOCS_DIR). Nonempty overrides win. Kimi home: KIMI_CODE_HOME, else existing ~/.kimi-code, else existing ~/.kimi, default ~/.kimi-code. Use one root for both paths; try other adapters if absent or unknown. Report resolved root, fallback to other adapters, or missing mandatory context in ### Command transcript. Installed snapshots refresh and prune retired topics only on sync.
• Read additional sections only when relevant to this command's role.
• Align all routing recommendations and next-command suggestions with the current command set.
• Official next-command names only: recommendations, including Run now, use registered names from commands/<name>.md or commands/<name>/SKILL.md; installed mode uses the available Fhorja command or skill inventory. No invented aliases. Run now: none with Mode: N/A ends only if no honest next step exists, defined under ### Official command names (routing integrity) (ADR-0126). Required inputs:
• project workspace path
• path to atom components (default: packages/design-system/src/atoms/)
• path to COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md (default: docs/research/COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md)
• path to ATOM_AUDIT.md (default: docs/research/ATOM_AUDIT.md; created if absent from templates/ATOM_AUDIT.md)

Task repository files to update:

• TASK_STATE.md (add audit summary with total_changes_needed count and cleared_since_previous_run delta)

Operating rules:

• Handoff: end with the adaptive ### Handoff block per WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Global output contract (Mode A compact or Mode B full).
• Step 1: Read COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md. Parse the rules (G-NN) and the columns they map to in ATOM_AUDIT.md (memo, callbacks, inline-styles, press-anim, touch-target, a11y, reduced-motion). Confirm the column set matches between the guidelines and the audit table; if guidelines added a rule with no audit column, prompt to extend the table first.
• Step 2: Enumerate atoms. List every directory under the atoms path. For each, locate the main component file (<Name>/index.tsx or <Name>/<Name>.tsx).
• Step 3: Check each rule per atom.
  • memo (G-01): is the component wrapped in React.memo or forwardRef + memo? Mark passing if memoed OR if props count is below 5 AND the component is not list-rendered. Count props in the TS interface and read usage sites to determine list rendering.
  • callbacks (G-02): count inline arrow callbacks that should be useCallback-wrapped. Read passes when 0.
  • inline-styles (G-03): count object-literal style={{...}} occurrences that violate G-03, excluding dynamic styles backed by a Reanimated shared value or memoized runtime value. Verify the value's source before applying the exception. Pass when 0 violations remain.
  • press-anim: if the component handles press, is the anim via useAnimatedPress / Reanimated UI-thread? useState transform is a failure.
  • touch-target (G-04): does the component define minimum 44pt tap target (or compose via padding/hitSlop)?
  • a11y (G-06): does the component have accessibilityRole, accessibilityLabel when icon-only, accessibilityState for interactive variants?
  • reduced-motion (G-05): if the component has transform/translate animation, does it check useReducedMotion() or fall back to opacity?
• Step 4: Compute changes_needed per atom. Sum the failing rules per row. Persist the integer in the rightmost column.
• Step 5: Update audit history table. Append a row to the "Audit history" section: date, who ran it (atom-audit v1), total changes_needed, cleared_since_previous_run (delta from previous total).
• Step 6: Group findings for follow-up. In the output (NOT in the file), suggest the top 3 fix groupings by rule (e.g., "5 atoms missing reduced-motion check"), each as a candidate slice for task-init.
• Do NOT implement fixes here. This command produces the audit only.
• If COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md does not exist, NO_OP_TRACE: route to design-bootstrap (which copies the template) or to a slice that creates the guidelines from templates/COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md.

Required output:

1. Atom count and audit summary (total changes_needed, delta vs previous run)
2. Per-rule failure breakdown (which rules have most failing atoms)
3. Top 3 suggested fix groupings (each is a candidate slice)
4. Path to the updated ATOM_AUDIT.md
5. Recommended next command

Claim grounding (active epistemic humility)

Claim grounding (active epistemic humility). This block governs what you may assert and how you record it. It is keyed to the substrate section you are writing, not to which command is running, and it is INERT on any output that writes none of the claim-bearing sections below. Full contract and rationale: wos/active-epistemic-humility.md.

1. When this applies. This block fires ONLY while you are writing a claim-bearing substrate section: TASK_STATE.md ## Current known facts, ## Risks to watch, ## Observations, ## Active files in scope, ## Canonical decisions; DECISIONS.md ## Locked decisions; IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md ## Current gaps, ## Risks and mitigations; IMPACT_ANALYSIS.md; EXTERNAL_RESEARCH.md; REFERENCES.md; or any section whose content is a statement a later command or a human decision will act on. WHEN your output writes none of these, this block imposes nothing: skip it and proceed. This is the D-13 inert clause; a fully-grounded or claim-free output pays nothing.
2. The unit is the load-bearing claim. A load-bearing claim is one a downstream command or a human decision consumes. A passing aside is not load-bearing; a statement someone will act on is. Apply the rest of this block per load-bearing claim, not per sentence.
3. Ground it or abstain. Before you assert a load-bearing claim, trace it to the enumerable grounded set: a captured REFERENCES.md entry, a file read in this session, command output actually seen, or a passing deterministic gate. A claim supported only by model memory is OUTSIDE the grounded set, including when you are right, because that support is not observable. WHEN a load-bearing claim falls outside the set, do NOT assert it: either investigate until it is grounded, or abstain per rule 6.
4. Status records provenance, never confidence. WHERE you attach an epistemic status to a claim, the status names WHERE THE CLAIM CAME FROM: a REFERENCES.md entry title, a file path plus line, or the gate output it came from. It SHALL NOT express a degree of certainty. Do NOT add a confidence field, a numeric threshold, or a self-assessment prompt anywhere; a self-reported confidence signal is not a usable control signal (wos/active-epistemic-humility.md Part 1.3). A status whose referent slot is empty is read as UNKNOWN, not as a weak yes.
5. Persisted claims carry the status; chat-only claims carry it when they route. Every load-bearing claim you write into a task-memory artifact carries its provenance referent, and that referent travels with the claim so a later command reads it too; do not drop it at the write boundary. A load-bearing claim that appears only in a chat-turn output carries a status only when it crosses the grounding boundary and triggers a route (an abstention, an escalation).
6. Abstain as a routed continuation, never a bare refusal. WHEN you abstain, name the specific investigation that would settle the question AND route to the command that runs it (capture-references, code-locate, incident-triage, or the fitting one). A withholding that stalls the work is invalid output. Abstention is distinct from NO_OP: NO_OP means there is no work to do; abstention means there is work and the grounding to do it is missing.
7. An unfired gate is not evidence. The absence of a fired check does not mean grounding existed. Do not read silence here as a pass.

Standard output layout (required)

Produce the command output using this structure (English only):

Artifact changes

Follow ## Global output contract in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md for APPLIED / PROPOSED / SKIP rules. Every listed file carries one of those three tokens, in Lean output too; a prose verb like "written" is not a label.

Command transcript

Brief audit trail (max 4 lines; max 3 in no-op runs with NO_OP_TRACE).

Handoff

Use the adaptive ending format of WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md ## Global output contract. Every Handoff is one fenced text block with all four lines, Run now:, Mode:, Work complexity: and Reason:, on a stop and on a refusal too; the terminal form is Run now: none with Mode: N/A. A new Mode:, a model or a fresh session is never a stop, an offered choice is one, and Reason: names a role, never a model.

Definition of done (command output)

• Every atom under the atoms path has a row in ATOM_AUDIT.md.
• Every rule from COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md is represented as a column.
• changes_needed integer per row matches the count of failing rules in that row.
• Audit history row appended for this run with date + total + cleared delta.
• Top 3 fix groupings suggested in the output (NOT in the file).
• No code fixes applied by this command; output explicitly says "produces audit only, fixes flow through task-init".
• Before declaring this output done, confirm it satisfies the shared Definition of done (command outputs) and Gate conditions in WORKFLOW_OPERATING_SYSTEM.md.

Quality bar: The output table must be machine-scannable and audit-decisions traceable to the source rule in COMPONENT_GUIDELINES.md. A reader should see in 30 seconds what to fix next.