agentleFS
MovGP0MovGP0/Skills/m09-domain/SKILL.md

m09-domain

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

CRITICAL: Use for domain modeling. Triggers: domain model, DDD, domain-driven design, entity, value object, aggregate, repository pattern, business rules, validation, invariant, 领域模型, 领域驱动设计, 业务规则

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before modeling in code, understand:

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    Before creating a domain type:

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    Always valid → private fields + validated constructor

    line 44

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Domain Modeling

Layer 2: Design Choices

Core Question

What is this concept's role in the domain?

Before modeling in code, understand:

  • Is it an Entity (identity matters) or Value Object (interchangeable)?
  • What invariants must be maintained?
  • Where are the aggregate boundaries?

Domain Concept → Rust Pattern

Domain ConceptRust PatternOwnership Implication
Entitystruct + IdOwned, unique identity
Value Objectstruct + Clone/CopyShareable, immutable
Aggregate Rootstruct owns childrenClear ownership tree
RepositorytraitAbstracts persistence
Domain EventenumCaptures state changes
Serviceimpl block / free fnStateless operations

Thinking Prompt

Before creating a domain type:

  1. What's the concept's identity?
    • Needs unique identity → Entity (Id field)
    • Interchangeable by value → Value Object (Clone/Copy)
  2. What invariants must hold?
    • Always valid → private fields + validated constructor
    • Transition rules → type state pattern
  3. Who owns this data?
    • Single owner (parent) → owned field
    • Shared reference → Arc/Rc
    • Weak reference → Weak

Trace Up ↑

To domain constraints (Layer 3):

"How should I model a Transaction?"
    ↑ Ask: What domain rules govern transactions?
    ↑ Check: domain-fintech (audit, precision requirements)
    ↑ Check: Business stakeholders (what invariants?)
Design QuestionTrace ToAsk
Entity vs Value Objectdomain-*What makes two instances "the same"?
Aggregate boundariesdomain-*What must be consistent together?
Validation rulesdomain-*What business rules apply?

Trace Down ↓

To implementation (Layer 1):

"Model as Entity"
    ↓ m01-ownership: Owned, unique
    ↓ m05-type-driven: Newtype for Id

"Model as Value Object"
    ↓ m01-ownership: Clone/Copy OK
    ↓ m05-type-driven: Validate at construction

"Model as Aggregate"
    ↓ m01-ownership: Parent owns children
    ↓ m02-resource: Consider Rc for shared within aggregate

Quick Reference

DDD ConceptRust PatternExample
Value ObjectNewtypestruct Email(String);
EntityStruct + IDstruct User { id: UserId, ... }
AggregateModule boundarymod order { ... }
RepositoryTraittrait UserRepo { fn find(...) }
Domain EventEnumenum OrderEvent { Created, ... }

Pattern Templates

Value Object

struct Email(String);

impl Email {
    pub fn new(s: &str) -> Result<Self, ValidationError> {
        validate_email(s)?;
        Ok(Self(s.to_string()))
    }
}

Entity

struct UserId(Uuid);

struct User {
    id: UserId,
    email: Email,
    // ... other fields
}

impl PartialEq for User {
    fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
        self.id == other.id  // Identity equality
    }
}

Aggregate

mod order {
    pub struct Order {
        id: OrderId,
        items: Vec<OrderItem>,  // Owned children
        // ...
    }

    impl Order {
        pub fn add_item(&mut self, item: OrderItem) {
            // Enforce aggregate invariants
        }
    }
}

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy WrongBetter
Primitive obsessionNo type safetyNewtype wrappers
Public fields with invariantsInvariants violatedPrivate + accessor
Leaked aggregate internalsBroken encapsulationMethods on root
String for semantic typesNo validationValidated newtype

Related Skills

WhenSee
Type-driven implementationm05-type-driven
Ownership for aggregatesm01-ownership
Domain error handlingm13-domain-error
Specific domain rulesdomain-*

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.