m05-type-driven
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
CRITICAL: Use for type-driven design. Triggers: type state, PhantomData, newtype, marker trait, builder pattern, make invalid states unrepresentable, compile-time validation, sealed trait, ZST, 类型状态, 新类型模式, 类型驱动设计
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Before reaching for runtime checks:
- Distinctive: line 35
Before adding runtime validation:
- Distinctive: line 45
Only at runtime → Result with clear error
- Distinctive: line 56
When type design is unclear:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Type-Driven Design
Layer 1: Language Mechanics
Core Question
How can the type system prevent invalid states?
Before reaching for runtime checks:
- Can the compiler catch this error?
- Can invalid states be unrepresentable?
- Can the type encode the invariant?
Error → Design Question
| Pattern | Don't Just Say | Ask Instead |
| Primitive obsession | "It's just a string" | What does this value represent? |
| Boolean flags | "Add an is_valid flag" | Can states be types? |
| Optional everywhere | "Check for None" | Is absence really possible? |
| Validation at runtime | "Return Err if invalid" | Can we validate at construction? |
Thinking Prompt
Before adding runtime validation:
- Can the type encode the constraint?
- Numeric range → bounded types or newtypes
- Valid states → type state pattern
- Semantic meaning → newtype
- When is validation possible?
- At construction → validated newtype
- At state transition → type state
- Only at runtime → Result with clear error
- Who needs to know the invariant?
- Compiler → type-level encoding
- API users → clear type signatures
- Runtime only → documentation
Trace Up ↑
When type design is unclear:
"Need to validate email format"
↑ Ask: Is this a domain value object?
↑ Check: m09-domain (Email as Value Object)
↑ Check: domain-* (validation requirements)| Situation | Trace To | Question |
| What types to create | m09-domain | What's the domain model? |
| State machine design | m09-domain | What are valid transitions? |
| Marker trait usage | m04-zero-cost | Static or dynamic dispatch? |
Trace Down ↓
From design to implementation:
"Need type-safe wrapper for primitives"
↓ Newtype: struct UserId(u64);
"Need compile-time state validation"
↓ Type State: Connection<Connected>
"Need to track phantom type parameters"
↓ PhantomData: PhantomData<T>
"Need capability markers"
↓ Marker Trait: trait Validated {}
"Need gradual construction"
↓ Builder: Builder::new().field(x).build()Quick Reference
| Pattern | Purpose | Example |
| Newtype | Type safety | struct UserId(u64); |
| Type State | State machine | Connection<Connected> |
| PhantomData | Variance/lifetime | PhantomData<&'a T> |
| Marker Trait | Capability flag | trait Validated {} |
| Builder | Gradual construction | Builder::new().name("x").build() |
| Sealed Trait | Prevent external impl | mod private { pub trait Sealed {} } |
Pattern Examples
Newtype
struct Email(String); // Not just any string
impl Email {
pub fn new(s: &str) -> Result<Self, ValidationError> {
// Validate once, trust forever
validate_email(s)?;
Ok(Self(s.to_string()))
}
}Type State
struct Connection<State>(TcpStream, PhantomData<State>);
struct Disconnected;
struct Connected;
struct Authenticated;
impl Connection<Disconnected> {
fn connect(self) -> Connection<Connected> { ... }
}
impl Connection<Connected> {
fn authenticate(self) -> Connection<Authenticated> { ... }
}Decision Guide
| Need | Pattern |
| Type safety for primitives | Newtype |
| Compile-time state validation | Type State |
| Lifetime/variance markers | PhantomData |
| Capability flags | Marker Trait |
| Gradual construction | Builder |
| Closed set of impls | Sealed Trait |
| Zero-sized type marker | ZST struct |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
| Boolean flags for states | Runtime errors | Type state |
| String for semantic types | No type safety | Newtype |
| Option for uninitialized | Unclear invariant | Builder |
| Public fields with invariants | Invariant violation | Private + validated new() |
Related Skills
| When | See |
| Domain modeling | m09-domain |
| Trait design | m04-zero-cost |
| Error handling in constructors | m06-error-handling |
| Anti-patterns | m15-anti-pattern |
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- ZhangHanDong/rust-skills★ 1.5k100% same
- actionbook/rust-skills★ 1.5k100% same
- fjrevoredo/mini-diarium★ 317100% same
- moeru-ai/auv★ 198100% same
- TeddyAlbina/skills★ 2100% same
- pocket-veto/pocket-veto★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- 13eholder/Modern-Cpp-Skills★ 14same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository73 other files it gives its agents.
- unsafe-checker/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- activity-tracingSkill
- beadsSkill
- code-analysis-warningsSkill
- coding-guidelinesSkill
- compiler-warningsSkill
- core-actionbookSkill
- core-agent-browserSkill
- core-dynamic-skillsSkill
- core-fix-skill-docsSkill
- csharp-compiler-warningsSkill
- csharp-object-designSkill
- domain-cliSkill
- domain-cloud-nativeSkill
- domain-embeddedSkill
- domain-fintechSkill
- domain-iotSkill
- domain-mlSkill
- domain-webSkill
- dotnet-pinvokeSkill
- dreamSkill
- gitSkill
- ide-warningsSkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- m01-ownershipSkill
- m02-resourceSkill
- m03-mutabilitySkill
- m04-zero-costSkill
- m06-error-handlingSkill
- m07-concurrencySkill
- m09-domainSkill
- m10-performanceSkill
- m11-ecosystemSkill
- m12-lifecycleSkill
- m13-domain-errorSkill
- m14-mental-modelSkill
- m15-anti-patternSkill
- mermaidSkill
- meta-cognition-parallelSkill
- modern-csharpSkill
- msbuild-warningsSkill
- mx-creative-keypadSkill
- nuget-warningsSkill
- nullability-warningsSkill
- rcs-warningsSkill
- renpySkill
- rust-call-graphSkill
- rust-code-navigatorSkill
- rust-dailySkill
- rust-deps-visualizerSkill
- rust-google-styleSkill
- rust-learnerSkill
- rust-object-designSkill
- rust-refactor-helperSkill
- rust-routerSkill
- rust-skill-creatorSkill
- rustSkill
- rust-symbol-analyzerSkill
- rust-trait-explorerSkill
- translationsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

