agentleFS
MosoFinMosoFin/mosofin-finance-skills/skills/gl-coding-assistant/SKILL.md

gl-coding-assistant

Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoAGPL-3.0View on GitHub

Suggests the general ledger account, expense category and tax code for each transaction from its vendor, description and amount, against the entity's real chart of accounts, and grounds each suggestion in how this entity has actually coded the same vendor before — with the count and recency. Rates confidence, separates clear items from ones to review, and flags possible capex, personal use, splits, transfers, related-party and cross-border items and inconsistent history. Reads the books through a connected Mosofin workspace when the user agrees, or works from an uploaded bank or card export plus a chart of accounts. Use when the user asks 'what account should this go to', 'code these expenses', 'categorize these transactions' or 'suggest a GL account for…', or has uncoded transactions. Do not use to design the chart of accounts itself, or to post entries (use journal-entry-builder). Read-only: produces a coded transaction list with confidence, reasoning, evidence and a coverage sheet, and posts nothing.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

Licensed with conditions — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.