agentleFS
MogerinhoMogerinho/Claude-Skills-Turkish/research-ops/CLAUDE.md

Claude-Skills-Turkish / research-ops

CLAUDE.md2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

This file provides domain-specific guidance for skills in research-ops/. The Research Operations domain ships skills that help R&D leads, clinical study teams, R&D finance/controllers, market-research analysts, and product-research / ResearchOps teams plan, fund, scope, and synthesize research across enterprise workstreams. This is the enterprise / cross-functional counterpart to the academic research/ domain (litreview, grants, patent, syllabus, pulse, dossier, notebooklm). It is not regulatory submission (ra-qm-team), not corporate financial close/valuation (finance/financial-analysis), not funding discovery (research/grants), not persona/journey/live-experiment design (product-team), and not…

Files
CLAUDE.md

Research Operations — Domain Guide

This file provides domain-specific guidance for skills in research-ops/.

Purpose

The Research Operations domain ships skills that help R&D leads, clinical study teams, R&D finance/controllers, market-research analysts, and product-research / ResearchOps teams plan, fund, scope, and synthesize research across enterprise workstreams. This is the enterprise / cross-functional counterpart to the academic research/ domain (litreview, grants, patent, syllabus, pulse, dossier, notebooklm).

It is not regulatory submission (ra-qm-team), not corporate financial close/valuation (finance/financial-analysis), not funding discovery (research/grants), not persona/journey/live-experiment design (product-team), and not campaign analytics (marketing-skill).

Skills (v2.9.0)

SkillPurposecontext: fork?
research-ops-skillsDomain orchestrator — routes to 4 sub-skillsYES
clinical-researchStudy design: protocol synopsis + endpoint selection + sample-size/power + phase-gatingNO
research-financeR&D program budgeting + burn/runway + F&A rate modeling + capitalize-vs-expense routingNO
market-researchTAM/SAM/SOM (both methods) + survey/sampling design + segmentation + CI synthesisNO
product-researchStudy design + saturation/sample method + insight repository synthesisNO

Hard rules (domain-specific)

  1. clinical-research: outputs are study-design RECOMMENDATIONS signed by a named clinician/biostatistician/regulatory owner. Power/sample-size is an ESTIMATE with stated assumptions — never presented as clinical fact. Every tool prints an "ESTIMATE — confirm with a biostatistician" banner.
  2. research-finance: every budget output surfaces its assumptions block. Capitalize-vs-expense routes to a NAMED finance owner and never auto-decides accounting treatment.
  3. market-research: TAM/SAM/SOM always shows method (top-down AND bottoms-up) + assumptions. Never a single unsourced number.
  4. product-research: never fabricates user insight. Sample-size/saturation guidance is method-based and surfaces confidence; single-source claims are flagged as anecdotes, not insights.
  5. Stdlib-only Python. Deterministic logic, no LLM calls in scripts.
  6. Industry tuning via --profile on every scoring tool.
  7. Matt Pocock grill discipline — /cs:grill-research-ops interrogates the plan against the research canon (ICH E9, IAS 38, Cochran, Nielsen, Kotler) before any sub-skill runs.
  8. Onboarding-first + customization-in-use. Each sub-skill ships scripts/onboard.py (its own question set) + scripts/config_loader.py. Answers persist to ~/.config/research-ops/<skill>.json (global) or ./.research-ops/<skill>.json (project) and are consumed by every tool (CLI flags override; RESEARCH_OPS_NO_CONFIG=1 bypasses). Customization must change behavior, not sit as decoration.
  9. Autoresearch is opt-in + isolated. Each sub-skill ships scripts/ar_evaluator.py — a per-skill, locked ground-truth bridge to engineering/autoresearch-agent. A loop is invoked ONLY on explicit user request and only edits the skill's input file, never the evaluator. No cross-skill coupling.

Build pattern

Path-B contract per skill: SKILL.md + 3 stdlib scoring scripts + 3 references (each citing 5-7 sources) + 1 asset template, plus 3 integration scripts — onboard.py (questionnaire), config_loader.py (customization loader, project→global→defaults precedence), and ar_evaluator.py (isolated autoresearch bridge). SKILL.md includes a "Forcing-question library" section (cited-canon grilling, one question at a time) and the "Onboarding & customization" + "Optimize with autoresearch (opt-in)" sections.

Agent + command pattern

  • cs-research-ops-orchestrator — evidence-first R&D operations lead. Voice: "What decision does this research drive, and what's your confidence — show me the method and the assumptions before the number."
  • /cs:research-ops <inquiry> — top-level router
  • /cs:grill-research-ops <plan> — Matt-style grilling first
  • /cs:clinical-research, /cs:research-finance, /cs:market-research, /cs:product-research — direct per-skill invocation

Anti-patterns (domain-level)

  • ❌ Skills that overlap ra-qm-team (regulatory/QM submission) — clinical-research designs the study, not the submission
  • ❌ Skills that overlap finance/financial-analysis (close/valuation) — research-finance manages R&D program spend
  • ❌ Skills that overlap research/grants (funding discovery) — research-finance manages money already won
  • ❌ Skills that overlap product-team (persona/journey/live experiments) — product-research is method + repository discipline
  • ❌ Skills that overlap marketing-skill (campaign analytics) — market-research is upstream methodology
  • ❌ A market size stated as a single unsourced number
  • ❌ A clinical power/endpoint output presented as fact rather than an estimate with a named owner
  • ❌ A product insight asserted from a single participant

References

  • Master plan: documentation/implementation/research-ops-expansion-plan.md
  • Matt Pocock derivation: engineering/grill-with-docs
  • Academic counterpart: research/ (litreview, grants, patent)
  • Regulatory complement: ra-qm-team
  • Corporate-finance complement: finance/financial-analysis
  • Product complement: product-team

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.