agentleFS
MogerinhoMogerinho/Claude-Skills-Turkish/commercial/CLAUDE.md

Claude-Skills-Turkish / commercial

CLAUDE.md2 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

This file provides domain-specific guidance for skills in commercial/. The Commercial domain ships skills that help deal-desk operators, pricing teams, partner managers, RFP responders, and commercial forecasters make per-deal and packaging decisions. This is not strategy (c-level-advisor/cro-advisor), not sales execution (business-growth/sales-engineer), and not financial close (finance/financial-analysis). Path-B 11-file contract per skill. SKILL.md includes a "Forcing-question library" section that grills the user with cited canon (Skok, Tunguz, Bessemer, Ramanujam, ProfitWell, Winning by Design, Shipley, APMP).

Files
CLAUDE.md

Commercial — Domain Guide

This file provides domain-specific guidance for skills in commercial/.

Purpose

The Commercial domain ships skills that help deal-desk operators, pricing teams, partner managers, RFP responders, and commercial forecasters make per-deal and packaging decisions. This is not strategy (c-level-advisor/cro-advisor), not sales execution (business-growth/sales-engineer), and not financial close (finance/financial-analysis).

Skills (v2.8.0 complete)

SkillPurposecontext: fork?
commercial-skillsDomain orchestrator — routes to 7 sub-skillsYES
pricing-strategistPricing model picker + Van Westendorp WTP + packagingNO
deal-deskPer-deal scorer + discount approval routing + redlineNO
partnerships-architect5-tier classifier + joint GTM + revshare modelerNO
channel-economicsCost-to-serve + ROI + channel mix optimizerNO
commercial-policyData-backed discount matrix + exception flow + policy linterNO
rfp-responderShipley-method structured RFP/RFI/RFQ responseYES
commercial-forecaster4Q-weighted bookings + cohort NRR/GRR + funnel-confidenceNO

Hard rules (domain-specific)

  1. Pricing outputs: model + range, never a specific number. The human picks the number.
  2. Deal outputs: score + named human approver. Never auto-approve. Even at 0% discount.
  3. Forecast outputs: surface the conversion assumption explicitly. Pipeline math without disclosed assumptions is theatre.
  4. RFP responses: never invent claims for GAP requirements. Surface the gap; leadership decides bid/no-bid.
  5. Partnership tiers: insist on independent-demand evidence for STRATEGIC. Forrester: channel-led deals from your own pipeline cost more than direct.
  6. Channel ROI requires retention differential. CAC alone is meaningless without channel-level retention.
  7. Stdlib-only Python. Deterministic logic, no LLM calls in scripts.
  8. Industry tuning via --profile {saas,api,enterprise-software,marketplace,services,hardware} on every scoring tool.
  9. Matt Pocock grill discipline — /cs:grill-commercial interrogates plan against SaaS pricing canon before any sub-skill runs.

Build pattern

Path-B 11-file contract per skill. SKILL.md includes a "Forcing-question library" section that grills the user with cited canon (Skok, Tunguz, Bessemer, Ramanujam, ProfitWell, Winning by Design, Shipley, APMP).

Agent + command pattern

  • cs-commercial-orchestrator — margin-protective Commercial lead. Voice: "What's the margin at full discount, AND what does next quarter's pipeline look like at the same terms?"
  • /cs:commercial <inquiry> — top-level router
  • /cs:grill-commercial <plan> — Matt-style grilling first
  • /cs:pricing-strategy, /cs:deal-review, /cs:partner-tier, /cs:channel-econ, /cs:commercial-policy, /cs:rfp-respond, /cs:commercial-forecast — direct per-skill invocation

Anti-patterns (domain-level)

  • ❌ Skills that overlap business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer (prose authoring) — Commercial is decision logic + structured response
  • ❌ Skills that overlap c-level-advisor/cro-advisor — that's strategic CRO judgment
  • ❌ Skills that recommend a specific price — recommend model + range
  • ❌ Skills that auto-approve deals — score + route to named human
  • ❌ Forecasting tools that hide conversion assumptions
  • ❌ RFP responder that invents claims — surface GAPs, leadership decides
  • ❌ Partnership classifier that grants STRATEGIC tier without independent-demand evidence

References

  • Master plan: documentation/implementation/bizops-commercial-expansion-plan.md
  • Matt Pocock derivation: engineering/grill-with-docs
  • Strategic complement: c-level-advisor/cro-advisor
  • Sales execution complement: business-growth/sales-engineer

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.