agentleFS
MesteriisMesteriis/Engineering-Bible-AI/skills/ui-concept-first/SKILL.md

ui-concept-first

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Sets visual direction from Figma, screenshots or an existing design system for major UI implementation.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When a direction is missing, select the complete original provider exposed in the current session: interface.interface-design for working …

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Use playwright-visual-qa when the rendered result needs visual verification.

    line 30

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UI Concept First

Establish enough visual evidence for a major new UI or redesign. Bible owns the reference choice and product constraints; author skills own their design process.

An existing design system, verified current screenshot or selected Figma frame can provide the target. Read design-system-extractor only when the reference needs implementation constraints extracted. Do not route through ui-router again for an already clear task or require a new concept for ordinary changes.

When a direction is missing, select the complete original provider exposed in the current session: interface.interface-design for working app screens; impeccable.impeccable with its shape reference for UX planning; product-design:ideate for requested visual alternatives; or an exposed Figma provider for editable design work. Use ui-business-apps for the business-app owner constraints. Keep native plugin and reviewed upstream ownership; provider files alone do not establish exposure.

Generated imagery is optional and only useful when it helps the requested surface. Dashboard and CRM interactions may be better represented by a working prototype or screen reference. No image-generation or recurring approval step is required by this owner policy. Preserve the user's selected direction and scope, and report unavailable providers or missing evidence precisely.

Use playwright-visual-qa when the rendered result needs visual verification; select other ui-qa evidence only as the task requires.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.