review-router
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Routes ambiguous review or planning to one leaf workflow. Do not use for a clear code, security, UI, architecture, or migration review.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Read the selected skill's SKILL.md.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Review Router
Route review/planning requests without mixing read-only review and editing.
Workflow
- Resolve whether the task is review-only, planning-only, or patch-producing.
- Pick the smallest matching skill.
- Read the selected skill's
SKILL.md. - For review-only work, do not edit files.
- For planning work, produce decision-ready slices, risks, and validation gates.
Routing
- PR, branch, commit, or local diff review with independent dimensions ->
multi-agent-pr-review. - Codebase orientation, bounded-domain map, or subsystem ownership map ->
architecture-map. - Framework, schema, API, package, infra, or data migration plan ->
migration-planner. - Combining multiple subagent reports ->
subagent-result-merge. - Post-failure process improvement ->
agent-retrospective. - Updating repository or global agent instructions after a repeated pattern ->
agents-md-retrospective. - Security-sensitive review -> route through
security-routerfirst. - UI/frontend review -> route through
ui-routerfirst.
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- R-Hatim/hrih-skills★ 6same name
- rysk-tanaka/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository62 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- accessibility-ui-reviewSkill
- agent-retrospectiveSkill
- agents-md-retrospectiveSkill
- agent-squadSkill
- architecture-mapSkill
- architecture-normalizerSkill
- architecture-principlesSkill
- authz-boundary-reviewSkill
- c-cppSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-to-figmaSkill
- code-wiki-ruSkill
- context-packSkill
- core-engineeringSkill
- debuggingSkill
- dependency-advisory-auditSkill
- deserialization-parser-reviewSkill
- design-system-extractorSkill
- documentationSkill
- engineering-standardsSkill
- esp32Skill
- esphomeSkill
- external-agent-pack-auditSkill
- fastSkill
- figma-to-codeSkill
- fix-security-findingSkill
- goSkill
- homeassistantSkill
- mcp-tool-routerSkill
- migration-plannerSkill
- mobile-qaSkill
- multi-agent-pr-reviewSkill
- performanceSkill
- playwright-visual-qaSkill
- pythonSkill
- quality-gatesSkill
- refactoringSkill
- responsive-breakpoint-checkSkill
- rustSkill
- secrets-and-config-reviewSkill
- security-diff-reviewSkill
- security-routerSkill
- securitySkill
- session-memorySkill
- specialist-dispatchSkill
- subagent-result-mergeSkill
- supply-chain-reviewSkill
- tdd-guardSkill
- testing-tddSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- typescriptSkill
- ui-buildSkill
- ui-business-appsSkill
- ui-concept-firstSkill
- ui-figmaSkill
- ui-qaSkill
- ui-researchSkill
- ui-routerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.