compose
Skill303 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill first for any Jetpack Compose or Compose Multiplatform task: a new feature or screen, a change to existing code, a bug fix, a review, making code follow the kit, project or build setup, or a question. It picks the task path and the exact kit files to read. Not for Kotlin work outside a Compose or CMP app.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lulufoo/lulu-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- tlyboy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jantichy/claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- by-carlos/daikenjatheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- matthewharrilal/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- drader/researcher_agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- flexprice/flexprice★ 6.9ksame name
- renatoworks/strudel-claude★ 61same name
- jantichy/claude★ 45same name
- Epistates/sparX★ 3same name
- lulufoo/lulu-workflow★ 3same name
- drader/researcher_agent★ 2same name
- cacardinal/laila★ 1same name
- tlyboy/skills★ 1same name
- by-carlos/daikenja★ 0same name
- csfh/skills★ 0same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/reference-file-standards.mdcCursor rule
- compose-architectureSkill
- compose-dataSkill
- compose-featureSkill
- compose-platformSkill
- compose-projectSkill
- compose-uiSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Verify before claiming done: run the checks named by the task path and report their result.
- Distinctive: line 20
Look in the prompt, then the code.
- Distinctive: line 23
No human can answer (CI or headless): proceed and list the assumptions.
- Very specific: line 38
Read the area's SKILL.md only for the task's main area.
- Distinctive: line 54
Not covered here → use judgement and state the assumption.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Compose
Every task
- Verify before claiming done: run the checks named by the task path and report their result.
- Changed what a user sees: run it and look, per
../compose-feature/references/run-and-see.md, or say it was not run. - Make the smallest correct change; keep what works.
- Explain the result in plain engineering reasons.
- Build from the context you have; state assumptions.
- Open only the files the tree names for your task kind and areas; open another reference only when a check fails or a named file sends you there.
Question 0: Is the task clear enough to act?
- Look in the prompt, then the code.
- Clear enough: continue to Question 1.
- A missing answer changes what gets built: ask at most 3 questions, each with a stated default.
- No human can answer (CI or headless): proceed and list the assumptions.
- In a kit project, never ask how the architecture should look.
Question 1: What kind of task is it?
- New feature or screen → 1. If adding to an existing project, use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree; 2. read../compose-feature/SKILL.mdas the main area; 3. scaffold with its new-feature script when applicable; 4. choose each area in Question 2; 5. run the feature checks and tests. - Change to existing code → 1. Find the affected code; 2. use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree and keep its coherent pattern; 3. read the owning topic skill from Question 2; 4. make the smallest change; 5. run its checks and affected tests. Change only what the request names; list related gaps as follow-ups. - Bug fix → 1. Use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree; 2. write a failing test that reproduces the bug using../compose-feature/references/testing.md; 3. read only the affected area in Question 2; 4. make the smallest fix; 5. show the test passing and run affected checks. - Review only → 1. Use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree; 2. read../compose-feature/references/review-mode.mdfor severity; 3. inspect only the relevant area in Question 2; 4. report findings and what is sound; 5. make no edits. - Conform or fix after review → 1. Restructure only: keep behaviour, visible UI, navigation, persistence and public APIs exactly as they are; 2. do not add screens, controls, wiring, saved state or features the existing code lacks; list them as follow-ups in the answer; 3. when changing a constructor or signature, update every caller and test in the same change; 4. run the existing tests before and after; both runs must pass; 5. run the guards. Use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree and../compose-feature/references/review-mode.mdfor severity. - Project, module or build setup → 1. For existing code, use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree; 2. read../compose-project/SKILL.md; 3. choose the build area in Question 2; 4. make the change; 5. run project checks and affected build/tests. - Question or explanation → 1. For existing code, use the
../compose-architecture/references/existing-projects.mdChoose tree; 2. identify the area in Question 2; 3. read only the file holding the fact; 4. answer with evidence and state any uncertainty.
Question 2: Which area does it touch?
Read the area's SKILL.md only for the task's main area; for every other area, read only its one reference.
- UI →
../compose-ui/references/ux-states.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-ui/SKILL.md. - Adaptive layout (tablet, foldable, desktop or browser window, window size) →
../compose-ui/references/adaptive-layouts.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-ui/SKILL.md. - State and lifetime →
../compose-architecture/references/state-ownership.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-architecture/SKILL.md. - Errors →
../compose-architecture/references/error-handling.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-architecture/SKILL.md. - Navigation →
../compose-architecture/references/navigation.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-architecture/SKILL.md. - Data storage →
../compose-data/references/datastore.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-data/SKILL.md. - Network →
../compose-data/references/networking-ktor.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-data/SKILL.md. - Paging →
../compose-data/references/paging.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-data/SKILL.md. - DI and modules →
../compose-architecture/references/dependency-injection.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-architecture/SKILL.md. - Platform / iOS / desktop →
../compose-platform/references/sharing-and-bridges.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-platform/SKILL.md. - Notifications and background work →
../compose-platform/references/notifications-and-background-work.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-platform/SKILL.md. - Build and Gradle →
../compose-project/references/convention-plugins.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-project/SKILL.md. - Testing →
../compose-feature/references/testing.md; if this is the task's main area, also../compose-feature/SKILL.md.
Not covered here → use judgement and state the assumption.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

