agentleFS
MaximepodgorskiMaximepodgorski/agent-skills/kickoff/SKILL.md

kickoff

Skill21 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Project context kickoff and maintenance. Conversational onboarding that generates structured context docs (.context/) and produces a CLAUDE.md for the project. 6 actions: init, update, todo, analyze, review, generate. Auto-activates on: "kickoff", "kickoff init", "kickoff update", "kickoff todo", "kickoff analyze", "kickoff review", "kickoff generate", "project kickoff", "project setup", "project context", "onboard project", "setup context", "open questions", "todo".

  • Reads credentials

31 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use standup, grill and 3 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    standup

    Generate a standup update from recent activity. Use when preparing for daily standup, summarizing yesterday's commits and PRs and ticket moves, formatting work into yesterday/today/blockers, or structuring a few rough notes into a shareable update.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • renatorozasSkill

    grill

    Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    status

    Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Fallback rule: If codebase access is limited, the skill works from conversation alone.

    line 31
  2. Very specific:

    Bootstrap first: Read existing artifacts (package.json, README, git log, file structure) BEFORE asking questions.

    line 75
  3. Distinctive:

    Checkpoint per axis: Write docs immediately after each axis completes.

    line 76
  4. Distinctive:

    Adapt to project: Not every project needs 7 axes.

    line 80
  5. Distinctive:

    Never invent information — if it wasn't said, it's not written

    line 104
  6. Distinctive:

    Before starting the interview, scan the project for existing artifacts:

    line 108
  7. Distinctive:

    Loading rule: Read the action file BEFORE executing.

    line 155
  8. Distinctive:

    All behavior is configurable by editing the skill files directly.

    line 229

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Kickoff

Project context kickoff. Conversational interview that builds structured docs for AI agents.

Agent Capabilities

CapabilityUsed ForRequiredFallback
File read/write.context/ docs, CLAUDE.mdYes--
Code search (grep/glob)Bootstrap scan, drift detectionRecommendedUser describes project manually
User interactionConversational interview, confirmationsYes--
Task/subagentanalyze action (parallel reviewers)RecommendedSingle-agent analysis
Shell/command executionGit log, package.json readRecommendedUser provides info manually

Fallback rule: If codebase access is limited, the skill works from conversation alone. Warn the user and proceed.

Actions

ActionInputOutputReference
init(none) or project path.context/ folder with axis docsinit.md
update {axis}Axis name (product, engineering, etc.)Updated axis docsupdate.md
todo(none) — reads .context/TODO.mdUpdated context docs + trimmed TODOtodo.md
analyze(none) — reads existing .context/Analysis report with findingsanalyze.md
review(none) — reads .context/ + codebaseDrift reportreview.md
generate(none) — reads .context/CLAUDE.md (or agent-specific config)generate.md

Flow

First time (kickoff):
  init → todo (answer open questions) → generate

With existing codebase:
  init (bootstraps from artifacts) → todo → generate

Maintenance:
  update {axis} → generate

Enrich context:
  todo → generate

Health check:
  review → update (if drift detected) → generate

Strategic challenge:
  analyze → update (if insights) → generate

Quick regeneration:
  generate (reads existing .context/)

Each action is standalone — usable independently without requiring prior actions.

Philosophy

  • Kickoff, not questionnaire: The interview is a conversation. Agent adapts to answers, challenges vague responses, and knows when to stop.
  • Objectives over scripts: Axis templates define WHAT to know, not WHAT to ask. The agent decides HOW based on the conversation.
  • Bootstrap first: Read existing artifacts (package.json, README, git log, file structure) BEFORE asking questions. Interview fills gaps, not blanks.
  • Checkpoint per axis: Write docs immediately after each axis completes. Session can be interrupted and resumed.
  • TBD is a valid answer: Early-stage projects can't answer everything. "Not decided yet" is captured explicitly, never fabricated.
  • Intention over description: Capture WHY decisions were made, not just WHAT exists. Agents can infer the "what" from code — they can't infer the "why".
  • Merge, never overwrite: CLAUDE.md generation always diffs against existing content. Never silently destroy user's custom sections.
  • Adapt to project: Not every project needs 7 axes. Detect project type and propose relevant axes.

Axes

AxisAlways?ContentDepth
ProductYesVision, users, features, roadmapDeep — agent challenges
EngineeringYesStack, architecture, conventionsDeep — agent challenges
DecisionsYesADR-lite records of key choicesMedium
DesignIf UIPrinciples, tokensStandard
BusinessIf commercialModel, landscapeStandard
MarketingIf PLG/contentPositioningLight
TeamIf >1 personRoles, process, toolsLight

Interview Conduct

The agent follows the rules in interview.md. Key rules:

  • Max 2 questions per message
  • Max 3 follow-ups per objective before accepting TBD
  • Product and Engineering: insist and challenge vague answers
  • Other axes: accept "not defined yet" and move on
  • Reformulate understanding before moving to next axis
  • Generate axis docs immediately when axis is complete (checkpoint)
  • Never invent information — if it wasn't said, it's not written

Bootstrap Protocol

Before starting the interview, scan the project for existing artifacts:

1. SCAN sources (in order):
   - package.json / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml → stack, deps, scripts
   - README.md → project description, setup instructions
   - Git log (last 20 commits) → recent activity, conventions
   - File structure (top 2 levels) → architecture patterns
   - Existing CLAUDE.md → current context, conventions
   - .env.example → services, integrations
   - CI config (.github/workflows, etc.) → infrastructure

2. STORE scan results as bootstrap_context (do NOT write files yet):
   - Pre-fill data for stack, architecture, conventions
   - Note what was auto-detected vs what needs confirmation
   - Files are written only at checkpoint time (after axis interview + user confirmation)

3. INTERVIEW fills gaps:
   - Show what was auto-detected: "I found X — is this accurate?"
   - Ask only about what couldn't be inferred
   - Product axis is always fully conversational (can't be inferred from code)

Action Router

User input
  |
  |- "init", "kickoff", "kickoff init",
  |  "project setup", "onboard project"       -> Load references/actions/init.md
  |
  |- "update product", "update engineering",
  |  "kickoff update {axis}"                  -> Load references/actions/update.md
  |
  |- "todo", "kickoff todo",
  |  "open questions", "@TODO.md"             -> Load references/actions/todo.md
  |
  |- "analyze context", "challenge context",
  |  "kickoff analyze"                        -> Load references/actions/analyze.md
  |
  |- "review context", "check context",
  |  "kickoff review"                         -> Load references/actions/review.md
  |
  |- "generate", "generate claude",
     "kickoff generate"                       -> Load references/actions/generate.md

Loading rule: Read the action file BEFORE executing. The action file contains all logic, references, and templates needed.

Output Structure (in user's project)

.context/
|-- product/
|   |-- vision.md
|   |-- users.md
|   |-- features.md
|   +-- roadmap.md
|-- engineering/
|   |-- stack.md
|   |-- architecture.md
|   +-- conventions.md
|-- decisions/
|   |-- 001-{decision-slug}.md
|   +-- ...
|-- design/                   (if UI)
|   |-- principles.md
|   +-- tokens.md
|-- business/                 (if commercial)
|   |-- model.md
|   +-- landscape.md
|-- marketing/                (if PLG/content)
|   +-- positioning.md
|-- team/                     (if >1 person)
|   +-- team.md
|-- TODO.md
+-- _meta.md

Principles

PrinciplePurposeReference
Interview conductHow to run the conversational interviewinterview.md

Templates

Axis Templates (interview objectives + strategies)

TemplateUsed byReference
Productinit, updateproduct.md
Engineeringinit, updateengineering.md
Decisionsinit, updatedecisions.md
Designinit, updatedesign.md
Businessinit, updatebusiness.md
Marketinginit, updatemarketing.md
Teaminit, updateteam.md

File Templates (generated output files)

TemplateUsed byReference
Context file schemainit, updatecontext-file.md
CLAUDE.mdgenerateclaude-md.md
Meta fileinitmeta.md
Decision recordinit, updatedecision-record.md

Output Templates (chat status messages)

TemplateUsed byReference
Init outputinitinit-output.md
Update outputupdateupdate-output.md
Analyze outputanalyzeanalyze-output.md
Review outputreviewreview-output.md
Generate outputgenerategenerate-output.md
Todo outputtodotodo-output.md

Configuration

All behavior is configurable by editing the skill files directly.

What to changeEdit
Action logicreferences/actions/{action}.md
Interview rulesreferences/principles/interview.md
Axis objectivesreferences/templates/axes/{axis}.md
Output formatsreferences/templates/{template}.md

References

Actions:

  • Init | Update | Todo | Analyze | Review | Generate

Principles:

  • Interview Conduct

Templates (axes):

  • Product | Engineering | Decisions | Design | Business | Marketing | Team

Templates (files):

  • Context File | CLAUDE.md | Meta | Decision Record

Output (chat):

  • Init | Update | Analyze | Review | Generate

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.