kickoff
Skill21 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Project context kickoff and maintenance. Conversational onboarding that generates structured context docs (.context/) and produces a CLAUDE.md for the project. 6 actions: init, update, todo, analyze, review, generate. Auto-activates on: "kickoff", "kickoff init", "kickoff update", "kickoff todo", "kickoff analyze", "kickoff review", "kickoff generate", "project kickoff", "project setup", "project context", "onboard project", "setup context", "open questions", "todo".
- Reads credentials
31 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lukashouthoofd/cenekathontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- takleb3rry/claude-global-appbuilding-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-analyst-lab/interview-prep-with-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sassarini-marco/track-to-demotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sanjeevkumarraob/chartertheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ncjsvr/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use standup, grill and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillstandup
Generate a standup update from recent activity. Use when preparing for daily standup, summarizing yesterday's commits and PRs and ticket moves, formatting work into yesterday/today/blockers, or structuring a few rough notes into a shareable update.
Also in 3 projects that use this
renatorozasSkillgrill
Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions31 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 31
- syutolee/digital-marketing-skills-pack★ 10same name
- ai-analyst-lab/interview-prep-with-ai★ 9same name
- 0x43e96f/skills★ 8same name
- zauberzeug/game-of-cards★ 7same name
- takleb3rry/claude-global-appbuilding-skills★ 6same name
- ArangoGutierrez/claude-toolkit★ 4same name
- adrian-wulf/vorarbeiter-code★ 2same name
- bluewhalelabs/claude-skills★ 2same name
- Kohulan/orthonym-skills★ 2same name
- Timmyy3000/skills★ 2same name
21 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- componentSkill
- design-screenSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Fallback rule: If codebase access is limited, the skill works from conversation alone.
- Very specific: line 75
Bootstrap first: Read existing artifacts (package.json, README, git log, file structure) BEFORE asking questions.
- Distinctive: line 76
Checkpoint per axis: Write docs immediately after each axis completes.
- Distinctive: line 80
Adapt to project: Not every project needs 7 axes.
- Distinctive: line 104
Never invent information — if it wasn't said, it's not written
- Distinctive: line 108
Before starting the interview, scan the project for existing artifacts:
- Distinctive: line 155
Loading rule: Read the action file BEFORE executing.
- Distinctive: line 229
All behavior is configurable by editing the skill files directly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Kickoff
Project context kickoff. Conversational interview that builds structured docs for AI agents.
Agent Capabilities
| Capability | Used For | Required | Fallback |
| File read/write | .context/ docs, CLAUDE.md | Yes | -- |
| Code search (grep/glob) | Bootstrap scan, drift detection | Recommended | User describes project manually |
| User interaction | Conversational interview, confirmations | Yes | -- |
| Task/subagent | analyze action (parallel reviewers) | Recommended | Single-agent analysis |
| Shell/command execution | Git log, package.json read | Recommended | User provides info manually |
Fallback rule: If codebase access is limited, the skill works from conversation alone. Warn the user and proceed.
Actions
| Action | Input | Output | Reference |
init | (none) or project path | .context/ folder with axis docs | init.md |
update {axis} | Axis name (product, engineering, etc.) | Updated axis docs | update.md |
todo | (none) — reads .context/TODO.md | Updated context docs + trimmed TODO | todo.md |
analyze | (none) — reads existing .context/ | Analysis report with findings | analyze.md |
review | (none) — reads .context/ + codebase | Drift report | review.md |
generate | (none) — reads .context/ | CLAUDE.md (or agent-specific config) | generate.md |
Flow
First time (kickoff):
init → todo (answer open questions) → generate
With existing codebase:
init (bootstraps from artifacts) → todo → generate
Maintenance:
update {axis} → generate
Enrich context:
todo → generate
Health check:
review → update (if drift detected) → generate
Strategic challenge:
analyze → update (if insights) → generate
Quick regeneration:
generate (reads existing .context/)Each action is standalone — usable independently without requiring prior actions.
Philosophy
- Kickoff, not questionnaire: The interview is a conversation. Agent adapts to answers, challenges vague responses, and knows when to stop.
- Objectives over scripts: Axis templates define WHAT to know, not WHAT to ask. The agent decides HOW based on the conversation.
- Bootstrap first: Read existing artifacts (package.json, README, git log, file structure) BEFORE asking questions. Interview fills gaps, not blanks.
- Checkpoint per axis: Write docs immediately after each axis completes. Session can be interrupted and resumed.
- TBD is a valid answer: Early-stage projects can't answer everything. "Not decided yet" is captured explicitly, never fabricated.
- Intention over description: Capture WHY decisions were made, not just WHAT exists. Agents can infer the "what" from code — they can't infer the "why".
- Merge, never overwrite: CLAUDE.md generation always diffs against existing content. Never silently destroy user's custom sections.
- Adapt to project: Not every project needs 7 axes. Detect project type and propose relevant axes.
Axes
| Axis | Always? | Content | Depth |
| Product | Yes | Vision, users, features, roadmap | Deep — agent challenges |
| Engineering | Yes | Stack, architecture, conventions | Deep — agent challenges |
| Decisions | Yes | ADR-lite records of key choices | Medium |
| Design | If UI | Principles, tokens | Standard |
| Business | If commercial | Model, landscape | Standard |
| Marketing | If PLG/content | Positioning | Light |
| Team | If >1 person | Roles, process, tools | Light |
Interview Conduct
The agent follows the rules in interview.md. Key rules:
- Max 2 questions per message
- Max 3 follow-ups per objective before accepting TBD
- Product and Engineering: insist and challenge vague answers
- Other axes: accept "not defined yet" and move on
- Reformulate understanding before moving to next axis
- Generate axis docs immediately when axis is complete (checkpoint)
- Never invent information — if it wasn't said, it's not written
Bootstrap Protocol
Before starting the interview, scan the project for existing artifacts:
1. SCAN sources (in order):
- package.json / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml → stack, deps, scripts
- README.md → project description, setup instructions
- Git log (last 20 commits) → recent activity, conventions
- File structure (top 2 levels) → architecture patterns
- Existing CLAUDE.md → current context, conventions
- .env.example → services, integrations
- CI config (.github/workflows, etc.) → infrastructure
2. STORE scan results as bootstrap_context (do NOT write files yet):
- Pre-fill data for stack, architecture, conventions
- Note what was auto-detected vs what needs confirmation
- Files are written only at checkpoint time (after axis interview + user confirmation)
3. INTERVIEW fills gaps:
- Show what was auto-detected: "I found X — is this accurate?"
- Ask only about what couldn't be inferred
- Product axis is always fully conversational (can't be inferred from code)Action Router
User input
|
|- "init", "kickoff", "kickoff init",
| "project setup", "onboard project" -> Load references/actions/init.md
|
|- "update product", "update engineering",
| "kickoff update {axis}" -> Load references/actions/update.md
|
|- "todo", "kickoff todo",
| "open questions", "@TODO.md" -> Load references/actions/todo.md
|
|- "analyze context", "challenge context",
| "kickoff analyze" -> Load references/actions/analyze.md
|
|- "review context", "check context",
| "kickoff review" -> Load references/actions/review.md
|
|- "generate", "generate claude",
"kickoff generate" -> Load references/actions/generate.mdLoading rule: Read the action file BEFORE executing. The action file contains all logic, references, and templates needed.
Output Structure (in user's project)
.context/
|-- product/
| |-- vision.md
| |-- users.md
| |-- features.md
| +-- roadmap.md
|-- engineering/
| |-- stack.md
| |-- architecture.md
| +-- conventions.md
|-- decisions/
| |-- 001-{decision-slug}.md
| +-- ...
|-- design/ (if UI)
| |-- principles.md
| +-- tokens.md
|-- business/ (if commercial)
| |-- model.md
| +-- landscape.md
|-- marketing/ (if PLG/content)
| +-- positioning.md
|-- team/ (if >1 person)
| +-- team.md
|-- TODO.md
+-- _meta.mdPrinciples
| Principle | Purpose | Reference |
| Interview conduct | How to run the conversational interview | interview.md |
Templates
Axis Templates (interview objectives + strategies)
| Template | Used by | Reference |
| Product | init, update | product.md |
| Engineering | init, update | engineering.md |
| Decisions | init, update | decisions.md |
| Design | init, update | design.md |
| Business | init, update | business.md |
| Marketing | init, update | marketing.md |
| Team | init, update | team.md |
File Templates (generated output files)
| Template | Used by | Reference |
| Context file schema | init, update | context-file.md |
| CLAUDE.md | generate | claude-md.md |
| Meta file | init | meta.md |
| Decision record | init, update | decision-record.md |
Output Templates (chat status messages)
| Template | Used by | Reference |
| Init output | init | init-output.md |
| Update output | update | update-output.md |
| Analyze output | analyze | analyze-output.md |
| Review output | review | review-output.md |
| Generate output | generate | generate-output.md |
| Todo output | todo | todo-output.md |
Configuration
All behavior is configurable by editing the skill files directly.
| What to change | Edit |
| Action logic | references/actions/{action}.md |
| Interview rules | references/principles/interview.md |
| Axis objectives | references/templates/axes/{axis}.md |
| Output formats | references/templates/{template}.md |
References
Actions:
- Init | Update | Todo | Analyze | Review | Generate
Principles:
- Interview Conduct
Templates (axes):
- Product | Engineering | Decisions | Design | Business | Marketing | Team
Templates (files):
- Context File | CLAUDE.md | Meta | Decision Record
Output (chat):
- Init | Update | Analyze | Review | Generate
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

