kickoff
Skill9 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build the candidate's experience database (story cards, numbers card, coverage map, story matrix, gaps) from a live one-question-at-a-time conversation or from talk-through transcripts in me/raw/. Use for /kickoff and whenever the coverage map shows a gap to fill.
31 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lukashouthoofd/cenekathontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- takleb3rry/claude-global-appbuilding-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sassarini-marco/track-to-demotheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sanjeevkumarraob/chartertheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ncjsvr/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- daksh-malhan/kickofftheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use standup, grill and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillstandup
Generate a standup update from recent activity. Use when preparing for daily standup, summarizing yesterday's commits and PRs and ticket moves, formatting work into yesterday/today/blockers, or structuring a few rough notes into a shareable update.
Also in 3 projects that use this
renatorozasSkillgrill
Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions31 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 31
- Maximepodgorski/agent-skills★ 21same name
- syutolee/digital-marketing-skills-pack★ 10same name
- 0x43e96f/skills★ 8same name
- zauberzeug/game-of-cards★ 7same name
- takleb3rry/claude-global-appbuilding-skills★ 6same name
- ArangoGutierrez/claude-toolkit★ 4same name
- adrian-wulf/vorarbeiter-code★ 2same name
- bluewhalelabs/claude-skills★ 2same name
- Kohulan/orthonym-skills★ 2same name
- Timmyy3000/skills★ 2same name
21 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- behavioral-scorerSkill
- interview-assessorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask ONE question at a time.
- Distinctive: line 19
Don't score, coach, or correct during the kickoff.
- Very specific: line 23
Read me/raw/*. Treat it as private: don't quote long passages back.
- Distinctive: line 38
Use only facts the candidate gave.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Kickoff: build the experience database
People recall more and undersell less when they talk casually. Your job is to draw the stories out, then do the structuring yourself.
Sources
- Question guides:
kickoff/session-1-work-and-scope.mdthroughkickoff/session-5-managers.md(session 5 only for managers) - Live mode rules:
kickoff/live-kickoff-prompt.md - Extraction rules and output format:
kickoff/extraction-prompt.md - Worked example:
examples/priya-kickoff-transcript.mdtoexamples/priya-experience-db.md
Live mode
- Ask ONE question at a time. Wait.
- Relaxed tone. Follow up on anything vague or missing a number: "roughly how many?", "what did you do yourself?", "what changed after that?"
- Don't score, coach, or correct during the kickoff.
- Respect "pause", "next area", and "build it".
Extract mode
- Read
me/raw/*. Treat it as private: don't quote long passages back. - Apply
kickoff/extraction-prompt.mdexactly.
Output files
| File | Contents |
me/experience-db.md | Story cards: Title, Situation, What I did, Result, Headline, Answers questions like, Likely follow-ups, Undersold (if any) |
me/numbers-card.md | 8 to 12 numbers with one line of context |
me/coverage-map.md | Common questions per round, Strong / Thin / Missing, with the covering story |
me/story-matrix.md | Stories as rows, question themes as columns |
me/gaps.md | Every [NEED NUMBER] and [NEED DETAIL], plus follow-up questions, most important first |
Merge into existing files. Never delete the candidate's words.
Rules
- Use only facts the candidate gave. Never invent a project, number, title, team size, or result.
- Missing facts are
[NEED NUMBER]or[NEED DETAIL]. Anything you composed is marked(suggested). - Flag underselling ("just", "only", "helped with", "small project") and show the stronger, still-true version.
- Remind the candidate to use ranges for confidential numbers.
- No em dashes.
- End with the 3 biggest gaps and offer to ask the first follow-up.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

