api-design
Skill4 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used when designing or building an API — endpoints, routes, request/response shapes, error formats, pagination, versioning, or deciding REST vs GraphQL. Trigger phrases include "design the API", "build an endpoint", "REST or GraphQL", "how should I structure my routes", "API error format", "paginate results", "version my API", "validate env vars", "idempotency", "what should this endpoint return". It applies proven REST conventions and a clear REST-vs-GraphQL decision, with env-config validation.
- Reads credentials
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- RostislavDugin/postgresustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Markssuave/Markssuave-Agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- databasus/databasustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
yuexueyuSkilldb-design
数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。
Also in 4 projects that use this
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 9 projects that use this
mryeastcodeSkilleverything-claude-code-conventions
Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.
Also in 8 projects that use this
tpavanipradeepSkillnextjs-turbopack
Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.
Also in 15 projects that use this
Indium-AI-LabsSkilldata-pipeline-design
Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).
Also in 3 projects that use this
thejordanleopoldSkillthird-party-integration
Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- databasus/databasus★ 9.3ksame name
- RostislavDugin/postgresus★ 9.3ksame name
- authgear/authgear-server★ 2.1ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
- Aaronontheweb/dotnet-skills★ 1.2ksame name
- epam/ai-dial-chat★ 501same name
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- KbWen/agentic-os★ 229same name
- DevelopersGlobal/ai-agent-skills★ 216same name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- ai-featuresSkill
- architecture-primerSkill
- authSkill
- data-modelingSkill
- deploymentSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- frontend-performanceSkill
- image-to-codeSkill
- integrationsSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- multi-tenancySkill
- paymentsSkill
- pre-ship-securitySkill
- product-discoverySkill
- pwaSkill
- rls-auditSkill
- saas-routerSkill
- secure-codingSkill
- technical-seoSkill
- ui-designSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 22
If you do choose GraphQL:
- Very specific: line 37
Never return 200 on failure.
- Distinctive: line 45
Every API needs config, and a missing var should fail loudly at boot, not silently in prod:
- Very specific: line 49
Commit .env.example (names + dummy values).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
API Design
This skill turns "I need an endpoint" into an API that is consistent, predictable, and safe to evolve. It encodes the conventions that the best public APIs (Stripe, Microsoft, GitHub) share.
Analogy: an API is the menu of a restaurant. A good menu is consistent — every dish described the same way, prices where you expect, no surprises. A messy menu makes every order a negotiation.
Discovery (max 3 questions, only if unknown)
- Who consumes this — your own React SPA only, or also mobile / partners / the public?
- Is it mostly simple CRUD, or deeply nested reads across many relations?
- Is it public-facing (needs versioning + stability) or internal?
Step 1 — REST vs GraphQL (decide first)
Default to REST. Reach for GraphQL only when: clients need flexible, deeply nested reads across many relations; you have multiple divergent clients (web + mobile + partners); or you're composing several backend services. For a single React SPA on one Postgres DB, REST (or tRPC for end-to-end TS types) is simpler and cacheable.
If you do choose GraphQL:
- Solve N+1 from day one with DataLoader (batch + cache per request).
- Design the schema around the domain graph, not DB tables.
- Paginate every list field (Relay-style
edges/node/pageInfo); enforce depth/complexity limits. - Mutations return the mutated object so clients update cache without a refetch.
Step 2 — REST conventions (the defaults)
- Resources are plural nouns:
/invoices,/invoices/{id}/lines. Verbs are HTTP methods, not paths. Non-CRUD actions:/invoices/{id}:send. - Version from day one: URI versioning
/v1/..., even with only a v1. - Cursor-based pagination by default (opaque
cursor+has_more), not offset — stays consistent on insert, avoids slowOFFSETscans. Default page 25, max 100. - One consistent error envelope with the correct HTTP status:
Never return{ "error": { "type": "validation_error", "code": "invalid_email", "message": "…", "param": "email" } }200on failure. - Status codes:
201 + Locationon create,204on delete,409conflict,422validation,429 + Retry-Afterrate limit. - Idempotency: require an
Idempotency-Keyheader on unsafe POSTs (payments, signups). Store key→response for 24h; replay returns the original — no double-charge on retry. GET/PUT/DELETE are idempotent by spec. - Consistency: ISO-8601 UTC timestamps, one field-casing convention (snake_case or camelCase) across the whole API.
- Filtering over endpoint sprawl:
?status=open&fields=id,totalinstead of a new endpoint per view.
Step 3 — Validate env config at the boundary
Every API needs config, and a missing var should fail loudly at boot, not silently in prod:
- Validate all env vars at startup with a
zodschema (ort3-envon Vite/Next). Fail fast on a missing/malformed var. - Separate server secrets from client config: on Vite, only
VITE_-prefixed vars reach the browser — never put a secret there. - Commit
.env.example(names + dummy values); never commit real.env*. (Secrets handling lives in thesecure-codingskill.)
Handoff
API shape decided here feeds the data-modeling skill (the schema behind it), the auth skill (who can call each endpoint), and secure-coding (validation + rate limits on each handler).
Step 4 — Failure semantics (decide them per endpoint)
- Check every
{ error }. Many SDKs return errors instead of throwing; an unchecked one is a silent failure. - Three outcomes, not two: succeeded, refused, unknown. "Could not read" is not "not found"; a timeout is not "nothing changed".
- A retry must be safe. "The response was lost" is not "it was not saved" — check what exists before inserting again.
- Send only the fields the user changed, so a form cannot overwrite what moved in the meantime.
- One server-side writer for rewards, credits, balances and payment states.
- Chunk id lists and paginate reads; auto-generated APIs cap rows and URLs have a length limit.
Field notes
references/field-notes.md holds 11 API failures from production apps. The three that cost the most:
- Failures invisible for days because an SDK's returned
errorwas never read. - A duplicated order that took four rounds to fix.
- Editing one field of a record silently reset another.
Output
Deliver: the REST-vs-GraphQL call with reason, the route list with methods + status codes, the error envelope, the pagination scheme, and a zod env schema for the service.
Reference
microsoft/api-guidelines (~23k⭐), Stripe API design + idempotency docs, donnemartin/system-design-primer (~352k⭐), graphql/dataloader (~13k⭐), t3-oss/t3-env (~4k⭐), colinhacks/zod (~43k⭐).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

