agentleFS
MartinOliveroMartinOlivero/saas-builder/skills/api-design/SKILL.md

api-design

Skill4 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

This skill should be used when designing or building an API — endpoints, routes, request/response shapes, error formats, pagination, versioning, or deciding REST vs GraphQL. Trigger phrases include "design the API", "build an endpoint", "REST or GraphQL", "how should I structure my routes", "API error format", "paginate results", "version my API", "validate env vars", "idempotency", "what should this endpoint return". It applies proven REST conventions and a clear REST-vs-GraphQL decision, with env-config validation.

  • Reads credentials

191 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use db-design, everything-claude-code and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • yuexueyuSkill

    db-design

    数据库工程师技能 - Schema设计、索引优化、并发安全、数据库审计。当你涉及数据库表/字段/索引/SQL/迁移/MCP数据库操作、建表改表、写查询时必须使用此技能。即使用户只是说"加个字段"或"查下数据",也应触发。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • InfopibeSkill

    everything-claude-code

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • mryeastcodeSkill

    everything-claude-code-conventions

    Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • tpavanipradeepSkill

    nextjs-turbopack

    Next.js 16+ and Turbopack — incremental bundling, FS caching, dev speed, and when to use Turbopack vs webpack.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • Indium-AI-LabsSkill

    data-pipeline-design

    Design batch or incremental ETL and ELT pipelines and warehouse models: grain, partitioning, idempotent loads, late-arriving data, data quality tests, PII controls, and cost monitoring, before building them. Use when adding or changing a dbt model, warehouse table, scheduled transformation, or ingestion job. Not for transactional schema design (use the database-design skill) or event-sourced stores (use the event-sourcing-architecture skill).

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • thejordanleopoldSkill

    third-party-integration

    Use when integrating with external APIs, payment processors (Stripe), webhooks, or third-party services. Use when implementing API clients with authentication and rate limiting, handling webhooks with signature verification and idempotency, writing contract tests for external services, or isolating third-party dependencies behind adapters. Triggers: \"Stripe\", \"payment integration\", \"webhook\", \"third-party API\", \"external service\", \"API client\", \"integrate with\", \"signature verification\", \"idempotency key\".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    If you do choose GraphQL:

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Never return 200 on failure.

    line 37
  3. Distinctive:

    Every API needs config, and a missing var should fail loudly at boot, not silently in prod:

    line 45
  4. Very specific:

    Commit .env.example (names + dummy values).

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API Design

This skill turns "I need an endpoint" into an API that is consistent, predictable, and safe to evolve. It encodes the conventions that the best public APIs (Stripe, Microsoft, GitHub) share.

Analogy: an API is the menu of a restaurant. A good menu is consistent — every dish described the same way, prices where you expect, no surprises. A messy menu makes every order a negotiation.

Discovery (max 3 questions, only if unknown)

  1. Who consumes this — your own React SPA only, or also mobile / partners / the public?
  2. Is it mostly simple CRUD, or deeply nested reads across many relations?
  3. Is it public-facing (needs versioning + stability) or internal?

Step 1 — REST vs GraphQL (decide first)

Default to REST. Reach for GraphQL only when: clients need flexible, deeply nested reads across many relations; you have multiple divergent clients (web + mobile + partners); or you're composing several backend services. For a single React SPA on one Postgres DB, REST (or tRPC for end-to-end TS types) is simpler and cacheable.

If you do choose GraphQL:

  • Solve N+1 from day one with DataLoader (batch + cache per request).
  • Design the schema around the domain graph, not DB tables.
  • Paginate every list field (Relay-style edges/node/pageInfo); enforce depth/complexity limits.
  • Mutations return the mutated object so clients update cache without a refetch.

Step 2 — REST conventions (the defaults)

  • Resources are plural nouns: /invoices, /invoices/{id}/lines. Verbs are HTTP methods, not paths. Non-CRUD actions: /invoices/{id}:send.
  • Version from day one: URI versioning /v1/..., even with only a v1.
  • Cursor-based pagination by default (opaque cursor + has_more), not offset — stays consistent on insert, avoids slow OFFSET scans. Default page 25, max 100.
  • One consistent error envelope with the correct HTTP status:
    { "error": { "type": "validation_error", "code": "invalid_email", "message": "…", "param": "email" } }
    Never return 200 on failure.
  • Status codes: 201 + Location on create, 204 on delete, 409 conflict, 422 validation, 429 + Retry-After rate limit.
  • Idempotency: require an Idempotency-Key header on unsafe POSTs (payments, signups). Store key→response for 24h; replay returns the original — no double-charge on retry. GET/PUT/DELETE are idempotent by spec.
  • Consistency: ISO-8601 UTC timestamps, one field-casing convention (snake_case or camelCase) across the whole API.
  • Filtering over endpoint sprawl: ?status=open&fields=id,total instead of a new endpoint per view.

Step 3 — Validate env config at the boundary

Every API needs config, and a missing var should fail loudly at boot, not silently in prod:

  • Validate all env vars at startup with a zod schema (or t3-env on Vite/Next). Fail fast on a missing/malformed var.
  • Separate server secrets from client config: on Vite, only VITE_-prefixed vars reach the browser — never put a secret there.
  • Commit .env.example (names + dummy values); never commit real .env*. (Secrets handling lives in the secure-coding skill.)

Handoff

API shape decided here feeds the data-modeling skill (the schema behind it), the auth skill (who can call each endpoint), and secure-coding (validation + rate limits on each handler).

Step 4 — Failure semantics (decide them per endpoint)

  • Check every { error }. Many SDKs return errors instead of throwing; an unchecked one is a silent failure.
  • Three outcomes, not two: succeeded, refused, unknown. "Could not read" is not "not found"; a timeout is not "nothing changed".
  • A retry must be safe. "The response was lost" is not "it was not saved" — check what exists before inserting again.
  • Send only the fields the user changed, so a form cannot overwrite what moved in the meantime.
  • One server-side writer for rewards, credits, balances and payment states.
  • Chunk id lists and paginate reads; auto-generated APIs cap rows and URLs have a length limit.

Field notes

references/field-notes.md holds 11 API failures from production apps. The three that cost the most:

  1. Failures invisible for days because an SDK's returned error was never read.
  2. A duplicated order that took four rounds to fix.
  3. Editing one field of a record silently reset another.

Output

Deliver: the REST-vs-GraphQL call with reason, the route list with methods + status codes, the error envelope, the pagination scheme, and a zod env schema for the service.

Reference

microsoft/api-guidelines (~23k⭐), Stripe API design + idempotency docs, donnemartin/system-design-primer (~352k⭐), graphql/dataloader (~13k⭐), t3-oss/t3-env (~4k⭐), colinhacks/zod (~43k⭐).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.