test
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write comprehensive tests for existing code or new features. Follow Arrange-Act-Assert pattern. Use when asked to add tests, improve test coverage, or write tests for a specific function or module.
179 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- tyrantpiper/travel-pwatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pche-broken-artist/forge-of-thoughttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PMDevSolutions/Flaviantheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use agent-context-isolation, agentica-infrastructure and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagentica-infrastructure
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from parcadei
Other versions179 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- s1lver091/pi-agent-config★ 463% same
Wrote their own version · 178
- react/react★ 252ksame name
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- apache/skywalking★ 25ksame name
- livewire/livewire★ 24ksame name
- NVIDIA/TensorRT★ 13ksame name
- FalkorDB/FalkorDB★ 10ksame name
- FastLED/FastLED★ 7.5ksame name
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.2ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
168 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- ci-preflightSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- debugSkill
- docx-processingSkill
- github-publishSkill
- implementSkill
- pdf-processingSkill
- permission-modesSkill
- planSkill
- pptx-processingSkill
- refactorSkill
- security-testingSkill
- specSkill
- web-developmentSkill
- xlsx-processingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 154 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Before writing any test:
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the function or module you are testing in full
- Distinctive: line 40
Follow the existing test framework and style in the codebase.
- Distinctive: line 44
Act: call the function
- Distinctive: line 45
Assert: verify the outcome
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 154 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Writing Tests (Opus 级)
Tests verify behavior, not implementation. A test that breaks when you rename a variable is a bad test.
Step 1: Understand what to test
Before writing any test:
- Read the function or module you are testing in full
- Identify its contract: given input X, what output or side effect is promised?
- Find existing tests to understand the pattern in this codebase
Step 2: Identify the cases
For every function or behavior, enumerate:
Happy path
The normal input that produces the expected output.
Boundary cases
- Empty input (empty string, empty array, zero, null)
- Single element vs. many elements
- Min and max values
- Exact boundary values (e.g. >= vs >)
Error cases
- Invalid input: what should happen?
- Missing required fields
- Network failure, file not found, permission denied
Edge cases specific to the logic
Think about what could go wrong given how the code works.
Step 3: Write the tests
Follow the existing test framework and style in the codebase. Do not introduce a new testing library.
Structure each test as:
- Arrange: set up inputs and any mocks or state
- Act: call the function
- Assert: verify the outcome
it("returns null when the token is expired", () => {
// Arrange
const token = createToken({ expiresAt: new Date("2000-01-01") });
// Act
const result = validateToken(token);
// Assert
expect(result).toBeNull();
});Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

