agentleFS
Marnie0415Marnie0415/pi-skills/spec/SKILL.md

spec

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write a technical specification for a feature, API, or system component. Use when asked to spec out, design, or document a feature before it is built.

168 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use backprop, ios-clean and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JuliusBrusseeSkill

    backprop

    Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • bastosSkill

    ios-design-review

    Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Saqlain-811

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Technical Specification (Opus 级)

A spec exists to align everyone on what is being built before any code is written. It should be precise enough that two engineers would build the same thing after reading it.

What to include

Work through each section. Skip a section only if it genuinely does not apply.

Overview

One paragraph: what this feature is, why it exists, and who it is for.

Goals

Bulleted list of what this spec achieves. Be specific.

  • Good: "Users can reset their password via email within 10 minutes of the request"
  • Bad: "Improve auth UX"

Non-goals

What this spec explicitly does NOT cover. This prevents scope creep.

Background

Context a new engineer would need: existing behavior, related systems, constraints, prior decisions and why they were made.

Design

Data model New fields, tables, or types. Use actual type notation.

interface PasswordResetToken {
  id: string;
  userId: string;
  token: string;       // bcrypt hash of the raw token
  expiresAt: Date;
  usedAt: Date | null;
}

API / Interface New endpoints, functions, or components. Include signatures and behavior contracts.

POST /auth/password-reset
Body: { email: string }
Response: { message: string }

Behavior Step-by-step description of what happens. Include error states.

Testing strategy

What tests are needed and at what level (unit, integration, e2e).

Open questions

Anything not yet decided that could affect implementation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.