test-audit
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit the tests in a scope. Delete tests that cannot fail, rewrite tests coupled to the implementation at the public seam, add the seam tests callers depend on, and prove the suite bites with mutation probes. Scope is a path or git range; empty means the tests the uncommitted diff touches or should have.
80 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- udecode/better-convextheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- TheLunchTrae/claude-code-configstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mageyuki/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- openclaw/openclaw-enterprisetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Swarzy-LLC/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- onegunsamurai/OpenLearningtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chips, redo and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
udecodeSkillchips
Run the project's suggested-task ledger, the chips. /chips alone brings this session's open tasks up to date: it applies what the ledger helper says, settles stale and split tasks, cards what can start and reports the board, and /chips all also takes the ship-list tasks and the ones no live session owns, and merges duplicate tasks across the board. Use for /chips, /chips offer, start or drop, \"what chips are open\", \"suggest a task for X\", \"update the chips\", \"clean up the chips\", \"which chips are stale\", \"is this chip still worth doing\", \"merge duplicate chips\", at the last hand-back of a run that offered a task, and whenever pstack would file a tracked issue, a follow-up, a reflect Backlog item or an out-of-band PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Scylla23Skillredo
Re-run the last routed task one model tier up (haiku → sonnet → opus → fable). User-invoked escalation when the previous result missed. Pass --dry-run to preview without running.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Aetheria-Labs1Skillplan-page
Plan one storefront page from strategy through final copy, section order, proof, offers, template direction, responsive layout, and production asset requirements. Stops at an approved execution-ready specification.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SocialKit-APISkillvideo-transcripts
Extract transcripts from social videos through SocialKit across YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, X/Twitter, LinkedIn, and direct video file URLs. Use when the user asks to transcribe, get captions or subtitles, pull the spoken text, or read what a video says, including one video or many at once. Returns full text plus timestamped segments. Not for posting, private accounts, or unrelated website scraping.
Also in 3 projects that use this
clawdbotSkillpr-simplify
Simplify your own change to its smallest complete fix. Use before opening a PR, before pushing large repairs to one, or when asked to shrink a PR or clean up slop.
Also in 3 projects that use this
spitoglouSkilltechnical-documentation
Create and improve technical documentation including architecture designs, PRDs, API docs, code explanations, and visual diagrams. Use when asked to document systems, explain codebases, create design documents, write PRDs, generate Mermaid/PlantUML diagrams, review architecture, write user stories, or create pull request descriptions. Triggers include "document this", "create a design doc", "explain this code", "write a PRD", "create a diagram", "architecture overview", "user story for", "PR description".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions80 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 80
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- paperclipai/paperclip★ 112ksame name
- simstudioai/sim★ 30ksame name
70 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- auditSkill
- clean-code-reviewSkill
- clean-code-setupSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- deslopSkill
- finishSkill
- interrogateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 77 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Every added test went red once: Before it is kept, the behaviour it protects was broken (a probe from step 4, or the line removed and …
- Distinctive: line 21
No mutant survives in the tree: Every probe is reverted; git status after a probe equals git status before it.
- Distinctive: line 35
Read every test and give it a verdict: keep, rewrite, merge, or delete.
- Very specific: line 56
Use a mutation tool when the repo has one: StrykerJS (npx stryker run --mutate "<scope>/"), mutmut (mutmut run --paths-to-mutate <scope>), …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 77 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Audit
A suite is measured by one thing: it goes red when the code is wrong. A test that cannot go red is dead code with a runtime cost, and a test that goes red on a refactor cements the implementation. This skill removes both, writes the tests a caller would want, and then proves the result by breaking the code on purpose.
Scope: $ARGUMENTS. Empty means the tests that the uncommitted diff touches, plus the seams the diff changed that have no test. A path means every test in it and every public seam in it. A git range means the same for the changed files.
The rules and examples are in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../clean-code/TESTS.md; read "Which tests to write", "Anti-patterns", and "Mutation probes". When a caller hands over a change record (target, check commands, baseline), use it and skip the matching parts of step 1.
Hard rules
- Production behaviour stays. This skill edits tests. The one production change allowed is the smallest seam change that lets a test reach the interface (a dependency accepted as a parameter instead of constructed inside), behaviour unchanged, named in the report.
- Every deletion names what remains. The test that still covers the behaviour, or the reason no coverage is needed (trivial code, framework behaviour).
- Every added test went red once. Before it is kept, the behaviour it protects was broken (a probe from step 4, or the line removed and restored) and the test failed.
- No mutant survives in the tree. Every probe is reverted;
git statusafter a probe equalsgit statusbefore it.
Process
1. Inventory
- List the test files in scope and, for each, the seam it crosses (the public interface a caller would use). List the public seams in scope with no test.
- Identify the runner and the focused command. Run the suite: baseline
N/Nand wall time. - Coverage, if the runner has it (
--coverage,pytest --cov,go test -cover,cargo llvm-cov), is a hint about where to look, never a target.
Done when every test file maps to a seam and every seam has its test files, or "none".
2. Classify every test
Read every test and give it a verdict: keep, rewrite, merge, or delete. Write a row only for rewrite, merge, and delete, with the tell; keeps are counted, not listed.
| Verdict | Tells |
| delete | tautological (the expected value is computed the way the code computes it, or the test reads an artifact and asserts it contains itself); asserts that an internal collaborator was called (a call to an external boundary that is the contract stays); tests the framework, the language, or a library; tests trivial code no caller depends on as a contract; duplicates another test with cosmetic input changes; has no assertion; skipped or commented out without a ticket; snapshots output nobody reads |
| rewrite | reaches past the interface (private state, spies on internals, verifies through a side channel); mocks an own module (vi.mock, jest.mock, monkeypatch on project code) instead of injecting through the seam; depends on real time, sleep, ordering, or state left by another test; named for the mechanism instead of the behaviour |
| merge | several tests whose inputs belong to the same class; one table-driven test with one row per distinct class |
| keep | one behaviour at a seam, an expected value from an independent source, one reason to fail |
Done when every test in scope has a verdict and every non-keep verdict has a row.
3. Act
- Apply the rows: delete, rewrite at the seam, merge. Where a rewrite needs a dependency injected, make that one change (rule 1).
- Add what is missing, per seam: the behaviour the seam exists for; the edge cases the spec names (empty, boundary, invalid input at a boundary); the error mode callers depend on; a regression test for every bug the history names (
git log --grep fix -- <scope>) that has none. Choose the level where the behaviour is observable (unit, integration, end-to-end, contract, property). Name each test as a capability. Expected values come from a known literal or the spec. - Run the suite.
Done when the suite is green and every row in step 2 has been applied.
4. Prove the suite bites
Use a mutation tool when the repo has one: StrykerJS (npx stryker run --mutate "<scope>/**"), mutmut (mutmut run --paths-to-mutate <scope>), cargo-mutants (cargo mutants -f <file>), gremlins (gremlins unleash <package>), pytest-gremlins (pytest --gremlins). Read the survivors.
Without a tool, probe by hand. For each production module in scope (in /finish, the functions the change touched; cap twelve probes), three mutants, one at a time:
- Negate one condition.
- Shift one boundary by one (
<to<=,nton - 1). - Return a constant, an empty collection, or
nullfrom the function.
Procedure per mutant: copy the file beside itself as <file>.probe, apply the mutant, run the focused tests, restore with mv <file>.probe <file>, confirm git status is unchanged. A mutant that no test kills is a survivor: untested behaviour (write the test named for that behaviour, apply the mutant again, watch the test fail, restore) or dead code (report it for /deslop).
Done when every mutant was killed, or its survival is listed with the behaviour it exposed.
5. Finish
Full suite; runtime before and after; git status shows no .probe files and no mutants.
Report
## Test Audit Report
Scope <path or range> · <T test files> · <S seams>
Tests <before N> → <after M> · deleted <n> · rewritten <n> · merged <n> · added <n>
Probes killed <k>/<m> via <stryker | mutmut | cargo-mutants | gremlins | manual> · survivors <n>
Runtime <before>s → <after>s
Gates typecheck <pass|fail|n/a> · suite <M/M>
Verdict <suite bites | survivors: <behaviours> | needs decision: ...>Below the block: each deletion with the coverage that remains; each survivor with the behaviour it exposed; each seam change made in production code. Nothing else.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

