interrogate
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Challenge a finished change from first principles before calling it done. Delete, then simplify, then stop. Target is a path or git range; default is the uncommitted diff.
73 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- thensls/nsls-builder-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ketchup-video, principle-explain-the-number and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 29 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 20 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 25 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
Xia-AtaraxiaSkillbenchmark-checklist
Vets performance measurements for the limiter, tuning, physical limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and proof that timed work happened. It applies to 'check this benchmark', 'report this speedup', measured regressions, and choosing a library or configuration from numbers. It reports spread and gaps before drawing a conclusion. Not for general testing policy or choosing test oracles - use principle-testing.
Also in 37 projects that use this
Other versions73 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 73
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8ksame name
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 667same name
- savannahfeder/agentbox★ 376same name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 126same name
- dsebban/skills★ 71same name
- overextended/skills★ 22same name
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 21same name
63 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- auditSkill
- clean-code-reviewSkill
- clean-code-setupSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- deslopSkill
- finishSkill
- test-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 73 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
Run typecheck and the focused tests after the cuts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 73 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Interrogate
Think from first principles about what the change is trying to achieve, then interrogate what was built before calling it done.
Target: $ARGUMENTS. Empty means the uncommitted diff (git diff HEAD); a ref means the diff since its merge-base.
Questions
Answer each in a line or two, against the actual diff, before touching anything. When a caller hands over a change record, its purpose line answers the first question.
- What is this change for? One sentence, from the user's point of view, without reference to the implementation.
- What is unnecessary, over-complicated, or resting on a weak assumption? Challenge each assumption: is it true, and is it needed?
- What can be deleted entirely? Files, functions, parameters, options, branches, tests, comments. Apply the deletion test: would removing it lose behaviour or information the user asked for?
- What becomes simpler once the deleted pieces are gone? A helper with two callers may now have one; a parameter may now have one value; a layer may now only forward.
Order of preference
Deleting over simplifying. Simplifying over optimizing. Optimizing over automating.
A cut lower on this list is only considered after the cuts above it are exhausted.
Act
- Make the cuts, smallest edit first. Keep each cut independently reviewable.
- Run typecheck and the focused tests after the cuts; run the full suite once at the end.
- A cut that changes observable behaviour is reverted and reported.
- It might already be done. There is no obligation to change anything: when the answers to the questions are "nothing", say so and leave the change alone.
Report
## Interrogation
Target <range> · <N files>
Purpose <one sentence>
Deleted <list: what and why, or "nothing">
Simplified <list, or "nothing">
Diff +<added> / -<removed> lines · net <±n> (scripts/diff-stats.sh in the clean-code skill folder)
Gates typecheck <pass|fail> · tests <passed>/<total>
Verdict <done | done after cuts | needs decision: ...>Under ten lines. No cut is listed without the verification that followed it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

