visual-reasoning
Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when analyzing an image for objects, palette, composition, mood, visual hierarchy, and prompt intent.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- cli-maintainerSkill
- docs-maintainerSkill
- image-quality-auditSkill
- json-contract-maintainerSkill
- mcp-tools-maintainerSkill
- model-setup-maintainerSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- repo-awareSkill
- reverse-promptSkill
- screenshot-ui-reviewSkill
- vision-regression-evalSkill
- visual-architecture-analysisSkill
- web-ui-maintainerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when the user wants to understand what an image contains and why it works visually.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Visual Reasoning
Use this skill when the user wants to understand what an image contains and why it works visually.
Evals
Should trigger
- "what's in this image and why does it work?"
- "analyze the palette and composition"
- "detect the objects in this photo"
- "describe the mood and visual hierarchy"
Should not trigger
- "turn it into a prompt" → use
reverse-prompt - "review a UI screenshot" → use
screenshot-ui-review - "score composition quality" → use
image-quality-audit
Core workflow
- Inspect image metadata (format, resolution)
- Detect objects (YOLOv8n)
- Extract dominant palette
- Estimate brightness and contrast
- Analyze composition (rule-of-thirds, symmetry, visual weight, depth)
- Generate structured reverse prompt
- Return both human-readable and JSON output
Inputs
image_path— local path to image file (jpg, png, webp)output_format—text(default) orjson
Outputs
objects— detected labels with confidencepalette— dominant hex colorsbrightness— dark / mid-tone / brightcontrast— low / moderate / highdepth— shallow / moderate / deepcomposition— balance, alignment, symmetry scorereverse_prompt— single-string prompt reconstructed from signals
Prefer
- Deterministic output — same image, same result
- Explainable labels — no vague descriptions
- Compact summaries — useful in agent context windows
- JSON contracts — stable shape for integrations
Avoid
- Generating new images
- Making unverifiable aesthetic claims
- Overwriting source files
- External API calls without explicit configuration
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

