visual-architecture-analysis
Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when adding or changing mq-image-analyze features for architecture diagrams, infrastructure topology screenshots, terminal screenshots, OCR pipelines, or visual observations consumed by mq-mcp.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- cli-maintainerSkill
- docs-maintainerSkill
- image-quality-auditSkill
- json-contract-maintainerSkill
- mcp-tools-maintainerSkill
- model-setup-maintainerSkill
- release-readinessSkill
- repo-awareSkill
- reverse-promptSkill
- screenshot-ui-reviewSkill
- vision-regression-evalSkill
- visual-reasoningSkill
- web-ui-maintainerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill when visual analysis feeds architecture or review workflows.
- Distinctive: line 44
Prefer structured JSON observations over prose.
- Distinctive: line 46
Keep OCR text bounded and avoid claiming certainty for low-quality images.
- Distinctive: line 47
Add schema fields additively unless a major version bump is intended.
- Distinctive: line 56
Update examples when JSON output changes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Visual Architecture Analysis
Use this skill when visual analysis feeds architecture or review workflows.
Evals
Should trigger
- "add OCR for architecture diagrams"
- "analyze this infra topology screenshot"
- "extract diagram observations for mq-mcp"
- "parse this terminal screenshot pipeline"
Should not trigger
- "review a UI screenshot for usability" → use
screenshot-ui-review - "general image analysis" → use
visual-reasoning - "change MCP tool schemas" → use
mcp-tools-maintainer
Boundary
mq-image-analyze owns visual observation: objects, layout, OCR, topology hints, palette, screenshot structure and machine-readable visual facts.
It must not generate final review findings, own architecture memory, or make architecture decisions. mq-mcp consumes the observations and performs cognition.
Files To Inspect
mq_image_analyze/cli/mq_image_analyze/vision/mq_image_analyze/reasoning/docs/json-schema.mddocs/mcp-tools.mdexamples/tests/test_analyze_ui.pytests/test_json_schema.py
Output Rules
- Prefer structured JSON observations over prose.
- Include limitations and confidence where detection is heuristic.
- Keep OCR text bounded and avoid claiming certainty for low-quality images.
- Add schema fields additively unless a major version bump is intended.
Verification
python -m pytest tests/test_json_schema.py tests/test_analyze_ui.py -q
bash scripts/validate.shUpdate examples when JSON output changes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

