critique
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Single-pass 3-agent critique for ANY work product — plans, code, designs, architecture. The general-purpose refinement tool.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 72 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 37
If --type not specified, auto-detect:
- Distinctive: line 78
Use the Agent tool (subagent_type: general-purpose) to spawn 3 critique agents.
- Distinctive: line 115
If yes, revise the work product inline
- Distinctive: line 119
After writing a plan (before executing)
- Distinctive: line 120
After drafting architecture or design docs
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 72 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Critique (/critique)
Single-pass 3-agent critique that works on any work product — plans, code, designs, architecture, specs, strategies.
Unlike /simplify (code-only), this works on everything.
Arguments
| Arg | Effect |
--type TYPE | Force type: code, plan, design, architecture, strategy (auto-detected if omitted) |
--agents "A,B,C" | Custom agent perspectives |
--security | Preset: Solution-Fit, Security, Edge Cases |
--performance | Preset: Solution-Fit, Performance, Elegance |
--apply | Auto-apply improvements (default: present findings and ask) |
Instructions
Step 1: Identify the Work Product
Find what to critique from context:
- Plan file in conversation or referenced path
- Code in recent conversation or uncommitted changes
- Design/architecture document
- Any substantive work product
If nothing found:
"Nothing to critique. Point me at a file, paste content, or describe what to review." Then STOP.
Step 2: Detect Type
If --type not specified, auto-detect:
- Has code blocks with implementation →
code - Markdown with ## headers, task lists, steps →
plan - Discusses components, interfaces, data flow →
architecture - UI/UX layouts, wireframes, component specs →
design - Business goals, roadmap, priorities →
strategy - Default:
plan
Key difference from /simplify: default is plan, not code.
Step 3: Select Agent Perspectives by Type
For plans:
- Completeness — Are all steps defined? Missing prerequisites? Gaps between steps?
- Feasibility — Can each step actually be executed? Unrealistic assumptions?
- Risk & Edge Cases — What could go wrong? What's the fallback?
For code:
- Solution-Problem Fit — Does it solve the stated problem?
- Edge Cases & Gaps — What could break?
- Elegance & Simplicity — Can it be simpler?
For architecture:
- Separation of Concerns — Clean boundaries? Right abstractions?
- Scalability & Evolution — Will this grow well? Paint into corners?
- Integration Risk — Dependencies, coupling, failure modes?
For design:
- User Flow — Is the happy path clear? Dead ends?
- Consistency — Patterns reused? Naming coherent?
- Edge States — Empty, error, loading, overflow handled?
For strategy:
- Goal Alignment — Do actions connect to stated goals?
- Prioritization — Is sequencing justified? Dependencies right?
- Blind Spots — What's not being considered?
Custom agents override these defaults.
Step 4: Dispatch 3 Agents in Parallel
Use the Agent tool (subagent_type: general-purpose) to spawn 3 critique agents.
Each agent prompt includes:
- The work product (full text)
- Their specific critique focus
- The detected type
- Project context (CLAUDE.md excerpt if available)
- Instruction: "Return a numbered list of specific, actionable findings. No fluff. Each finding must include: what's wrong, why it matters, and a concrete fix."
Step 5: Synthesize & Present
Collect all agent findings. Deduplicate. Group by severity:
## Critique Results (TYPE)
### Critical (must fix)
1. [Finding] — [Fix]
### Important (should fix)
1. [Finding] — [Fix]
### Minor (nice to have)
1. [Finding] — [Fix]
### Verdict
X critical, Y important, Z minor findings across 3 perspectives.Step 6: Apply or Report
If --apply flag or type is code:
- Apply improvements directly
- Show diff summary
If type is plan, design, architecture, strategy:
- Present findings and ask: "Apply these improvements?"
- If yes, revise the work product inline
When to Use
- After writing a plan (before executing)
- After drafting architecture or design docs
- Quick single-pass code review (lighter than /pp2p)
- Strategy documents and roadmaps
- Any time you want 3 perspectives on non-code work
Comparison
| Skill | Passes | Works On | Polish Phase |
/simplify | 1 | Code only | No |
/critique | 1 | Everything | No |
/pp2p | 2 | Everything | Yes |
/pp3p | 3 | Everything | Yes |
Other versions79 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 79
- google-gemini/gemini-cli★ 109ksame name
- yournextstore/yournextstore★ 5.5ksame name
- plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
- remorses/critique★ 1.3ksame name
- talesofai/cohub★ 583same name
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 424same name
- nexmoe/eve★ 424same name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 398same name
- Southclaws/storyden★ 346same name
- 10xChengTu/Mux0★ 337same name
69 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use delight, teach-impeccable and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkilldelight
Add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected touches that make interfaces memorable and enjoyable to use. Elevates functional to delightful. Use when the user asks to add polish, personality, animations, micro-interactions, delight, or make an interface feel fun or memorable.
Also in 33 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 19 projects that use this
zwy123zwySkillnormalize
将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。
Also in 19 projects that use this
owshq-mecSkilllayout
Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.
Also in 8 projects that use this
- +8 more from HK-hub
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/deep-recon/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adversarial-researchSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- api-integrationSkill
- breakdownSkill
- c4-architectSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- coding-agentsSkill
- compound-engineeringSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- counterfactualSkill
- d3js-visualizationSkill
- data-analyst-agentSkill
- database-migrationsSkill
- deep-reconSkill
- design-tasteSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- e2b-sandboxSkill
- ecosystem-auditSkill
- excalidraw-diagramSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- fullstack-agentSkill
- grillSkill
- kickoffSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- model-migrationSkill
- naming-the-machineSkill
- full-output-enforcementSkill
- package-researchSkill
- pdf-generationSkill
- pp2pSkill
- pp3pSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- prompt-groundingSkill
- redesignSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- reverse-engineer-to-learnSkill
- review-changesSkill
- scratchpadSkill
- shipSkill
- slack-gif-creatorSkill
- sprint-architectSkill
- techdebtSkill
- test-and-fixSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- visual-verdictSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- web-asset-generatorSkill
- whatdidimissSkill
- writing-plansSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

