git-commit
Skill1 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create git commits following the project's conventional commit style with descriptive bullet-point bodies. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or invokes /commit.
- Reads credentials
174 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- HAOYI99/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- swjybky/deepwritetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pettheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- stuff4ai/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- apattichis/agentic-research-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Darna-Digital/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-pr, github-pr-create and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
klauswgSkillgit-pr
Prepare, review, publish, or update a complete GitHub pull request for the current repository, including local commit readiness, safe push strategy, semantic title validation, repository-native PR templates, issue linking, and checks verification. Use when the user asks to draft, create, submit, publish, open, or update a pull request. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final PR before any push or GitHub write.
Also in 11 projects that use this
mjun0812Skillgithub-pr-create
Pull Requestを作成するSkill。現在のbranchからpull requestを作成する。言語指定可能。 ユーザーが「PR作って」「pull request作成して」のように依頼したら使うこと。
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgit-branch
Branch management for implementation. Use when you need to create a branch, switch branches, checkout, or verify branching strategy before implementing code. Do not use for commits (use git-commit), pull requests (use pull-request), or advanced git operations (rebase, merge).
Also in 4 projects that use this
klauswgSkillgit-issue
Prepare, review, create, or update evidence-based GitHub issues for the current repository with duplicate detection, repository-native templates, valid labels, and post-publication verification. Use when the user asks to draft, file, submit, publish, edit, or refine a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, performance issue, or technical proposal. Always require the user to review and explicitly approve the exact final issue before any GitHub write.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gologo13Skillgit-push
Push current branch to origin and sync with remote updates; keywords: git, rebase. Use only on explicit request; before execution, review diffs and list impact scope.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgithub-pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions174 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 174
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- doocs/leetcode★ 37ksame name
- tisfeng/Easydict★ 15ksame name
- doocs/md★ 14ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- PC2005-cloud/dsh-pet★ 5.9ksame name
- GitTools/GitVersion★ 3.1ksame name
- igorescodro/alkaa★ 1.6ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
164 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- design-craft/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- android-emulatorSkill
- audit-branchSkill
- brainstormSkill
- create-devtoolSkill
- create-featureSkill
- create-infrastructureSkill
- execute-tasksSkill
- finish-featureSkill
- frontend-testingSkill
- generate-feature-docSkill
- generate-prdSkill
- ios-simulatorSkill
- modify-featureSkill
- pipeline-helpSkill
- plan-implementationSkill
- prd-clarifierSkill
- prd-to-uxSkill
- prototypeSkill
- react-clean-architectureSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- refactoring-uiSkill
- setup-daher-skillsSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-mobile-appSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 134 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Create git commits following the project's conventional commit style with descriptive bullet-point bodies.
- Distinctive: line 13
After completing a feature, fix, or refactor
- Very specific: line 14
When user invokes /commit
- Distinctive: line 38
Start with capital letter after the colon
- Distinctive: line 39
No period at the end
- Distinctive: line 82
Not every commit group will apply — skip empty groups.
- Very specific: line 94
When execute-tasks invokes this skill for a checkpoint, skip the confirmation and Step 1's grouping — it is one commit:
- Very specific: line 98
Commit locally and never push — publishing is finish-feature's decision.
- Distinctive: line 109
Do NOT stage files that contain secrets (.env, credentials)
- Distinctive: line 113
Run git status after all commits to confirm clean working tree.
- Very specific: line 177
When a PR follows the commit, the base is the project's base/integration branch from docs/agents/project-conventions.md, never assumed to …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 134 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Git Commit
Create git commits following the project's conventional commit style with descriptive bullet-point bodies.
When to Use
- User says "commit", "save changes", "create a commit"
- After completing a feature, fix, or refactor
- When user invokes
/commit
Commit Style
Based on the project's commit history, commits follow this format:
Subject Line
{type}: {Short imperative description}Types:
| Type | When |
feat | New feature or capability |
fix | Bug fix |
refactor | Code restructuring without behavior change |
chore | Dependencies, config, tooling, cleanup |
test | Adding or updating tests |
docs | Documentation only |
Rules:
- Imperative mood ("Create", "Add", "Update", "Fix" — not "Created", "Added")
- Start with capital letter after the colon
- No period at the end
- Under 72 characters
Body (Required for non-trivial commits)
- Bullet point describing a key change
- Another key change
- Group related changes logicallyRules:
- Each bullet starts with
-(dash + space) - Each bullet is imperative mood ("Add X", "Update Y", "Wire Z")
- Focus on WHAT changed, not WHY (the subject covers the why)
- 3-8 bullets typical for feature commits
- Skip the body for single-file trivial changes
No Co-Authored-By
Per user preference, do NOT add Co-Authored-By lines.
Process
Step 0: Build Freshness
Ensure a successful build ran since the last source change — the plugin's check-build-before-commit hook blocks git commit when the build output is stale relative to source files. If stale (or unsure), run the project's build command (from docs/agents/project-conventions.md; e.g. pnpm build) and confirm it succeeds before proceeding. One fresh build covers all split commits in the same session.
Step 1: Analyze and Group Changes
Split changes into multiple focused commits by layer/concern. Never combine everything into one monolithic commit.
Grouping order (commit in this sequence):
| Order | Type | What belongs |
| 1 | chore | shadcn installs, dependencies, config, tooling |
| 2 | feat | Shared infrastructure (ui/custom/, shared/) |
| 3 | feat | Domain layer (types, pure functions, state logic) |
| 4 | feat | Feature code (API adapters, hooks, components, page wiring) |
| 5 | test | Tests (.test.ts, .test.tsx) |
| 6 | docs | PRDs, UX specs, README updates |
Not every commit group will apply — skip empty groups. If a group has only 1-2 trivial files, it can merge into the nearest related group.
For each group:
- Identify the type (feat/fix/refactor/chore/test/docs)
- Draft subject line and body bullets
Step 2: Confirm With the User
Always confirm with the user before creating any commit (standing preference — never auto-commit), except the Pipeline checkpoint below. Present the planned groups with their draft messages and wait for approval before staging anything.
Pipeline checkpoint (exception to Step 2)
When execute-tasks invokes this skill for a checkpoint, skip the confirmation and Step 1's grouping — it is one commit:
- Stage by name only the files PROGRESS.md lists for the deliverables in this checkpoint, plus PROGRESS.md itself; on the final checkpoint, also the run report
docs/agents/runs/<feature>-<YYYY-MM-DD>.json(this commit is the one that carries it). Anything else ingit statusstays unstaged — it is not part of those deliverables. - Message
chore(checkpoint): <deliverable ids>. - Commit locally and never push — publishing is
finish-feature's decision.
The user launching execute-tasks is the request. Every other invocation confirms.
Step 3: Stage and Commit Each Group
For each approved group:
- Stage specific files by name — never use
git add -Aorgit add . - Commit with the drafted subject and body, then move to the next group
- Do NOT stage files that contain secrets (.env, credentials)
Step 4: Verify
Run git status after all commits to confirm clean working tree.
Examples
Feature commit (multi-file)
feat: Create reservation details feature
- Add reservation detail page with checkout guide dialog
- Implement multi-step dialog with embla carousel and numbered pills
- Add location API adapter with AppError transformation
- Add checkout guide store with zustand for auto-open timer
- Wire Sonner toast provider in _app.tsx
- Route file is thin re-export, page component lives in featureRefactor commit
refactor: Move custom UI components to ui/custom
- Move AppContainer, BackButton, AppNavbar, LanguageSelector
from shared/layouts/ to ui/custom/
- Move ProgressMeter and Stepper from shared/components/ to ui/custom/
- Separate custom hand-crafted UI from shadcn CLI-managed primitivesFix commit
fix: Correct store data extraction in checkout flow
- Update monthly and annual pay-invoice pages to access nested data propertyChore commit
chore: Update dependencies and config
- Add embla-carousel, sonner, and zustand dependencies
- Add jsdom polyfills for Radix UI pointer capture APIs
- Update .gitignore and tsconfig build infoSmall commit (no body needed)
feat: Create shared linksAnti-Patterns
- Don't use past tense — "Created" → "Create", "Added" → "Add"
- Don't use
git add .— stage specific files - Don't combine unrelated changes — split into separate commits
- Don't add Co-Authored-By — user preference
- Don't skip the body for multi-file changes
- Don't amend previous commits unless explicitly asked
- Don't push unless explicitly asked
PR Base
When a PR follows the commit, the base is the project's base/integration branch from docs/agents/project-conventions.md, never assumed to be main.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

