red-team
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when running an authorized offensive-security engagement against a declared target (binary, web app, network, wireless, firmware, mobile). Routes to domain skills (re-binary, web-probe, net-probe, wireless-probe, firmware-probe, mobile-probe) and enforces the engagement contract (target/window/ROE) plus evidence discipline.
28 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kazemcodes/skill-treetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- drewmattie-code/red-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- desertcache/agent-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- fabiandistler/agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- geekatron/jerrytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use codebase-design, domain-modeling and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcodebase-design
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkilldomain-modeling
Build and sharpen a project's domain model. Use when the user wants to pin down domain terminology or a ubiquitous language, record an architectural decision, or when another skill needs to maintain the domain model.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgrill-with-docs
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 28
- zakirkun/deep-eye★ 2.3ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis★ 67same name
- geekatron/jerry★ 37same name
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 18same name
- PostHog/duckhog★ 14same name
- docxology/codomyrmex★ 10same name
- Zach-etier/skills★ 4same name
- drewmattie-code/red-team★ 3same name
- csiddhant796-blip/claude-skills-collection★ 2same name
18 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository110 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/project-bootstrap/templates/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- a11y-auditSkill
- agentic-ragSkill
- agent-reachSkill
- ai3d-genSkill
- ai-coding-dictionarySkill
- ai-toolsSkill
- animation-directionSkill
- api-specSkill
- architecture-diagramsSkill
- architectureSkill
- ascii-artSkill
- ask-bundleSkill
- binary-triageSkill
- bragSkill
- brag-slimSkill
- career-opsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- computer-useSkill
- context7Skill
- context-hygieneSkill
- creative-engineeringSkill
- cu-realtimeSkill
- data-analystSkill
- databaseSkill
- dead-wireSkill
- debuggingSkill
- deploySkill
- devin-configSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- dmaSkill
- dockerSkill
- drift-reportSkill
- e2e-testingSkill
- edge-casesSkill
- executionSkill
- fact-checkSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- firmware-probeSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gatesSkill
- ghidraSkill
- ghSkill
- github-actionsSkill
- git-workflowsSkill
- grillingSkill
- handoffSkill
- humanizerSkill
- hyperframesSkill
- i18nSkill
- image-forensicsSkill
- impeccableSkill
- implement-layaSkill
- intakeSkill
- jiraSkill
- knowledge-modelingSkill
- laya-orchestratorSkill
- learn-modeSkill
- mcp-governanceSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Every offensive action requires, before any command runs:
- Very specific: line 52
Every finding records: command argv, backend, tool version, target sha256 (for artifacts), confidence (confirmed|likely|unknown), and …
- Distinctive: line 61
No novel payload authoring.
- Distinctive: line 62
No credential harvesting, exfiltration of real secrets, or persistence.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Red Team
Orchestrator for authorized offensive work. Sibling of security
(defensive, audits our own code); this tree operates on declared targets
under an explicit engagement contract.
Engagement contract (mandatory)
Every offensive action requires, before any command runs:
target: declared scope (host, URL, artifact path, device)window: engagement windowroe: rules of engagement reference (allowed techniques, limits)
Missing contract = refuse and ask. Destructive or irreversible actions
require explicit per-action confirmation. No credential harvesting.
Missing tool = unknown, never fabricated; unsupported platform =
unsupported_platform.
Domain routing
| Target type | Skill | Engine |
| Binary / APK / firmware RE | re-binary | extensions/rea-ops/wrapper.py |
| Web app / API / injection | web-probe | offsec-tools (zap, sqlmap, nuclei, ffuf) |
| Host / network / SMB / TLS | net-probe | offsec-tools (nmap, netexec, testssl.sh) |
| Wi-Fi / RF / SDR / RFID | wireless-probe | offsec-tools (aircrack, hcxtools, kismet) |
| Firmware image / embedded | firmware-probe | offsec-tools (binwalk, unblob, emba) |
| Android/iOS app | mobile-probe | offsec-tools (jadx, apktool, mobsf, frida) |
Environment check (always first)
python extensions/rea-ops/wrapper.py doctor # REA CLI + engines
python extensions/offsec-tools/wrapper.py doctor # tools x backends
python extensions/offsec-tools/wrapper.py capabilitiesBackend order for offsec-tools run: --backend native|wsl|docker,
else auto (native -> wsl -> docker). WSL2 covers most Linux-only tools;
RF capture needs usbipd-win + hardware; native-linux-only tiers report
unsupported_platform.
Evidence discipline
Every finding records: command argv, backend, tool version,
target sha256 (for artifacts), confidence (confirmed|likely|unknown),
and limitations. unknown is a valid answer; absence of evidence is not
evidence of absence. Store engagement artifacts under .devin/scratch/
or the engagement workdir, never in target scope.
Boundaries
- Defensive audits of our own code/config go to
securityskill. - No novel payload authoring; use documented tool capabilities.
- No credential harvesting, exfiltration of real secrets, or persistence.
- Active/destructive tool modes are gated by the wrapper (
--confirm); confirm per action with the user, not per session.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

