executing-plans
Skill5 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
当你有一份书面实现计划需要在单独的会话中执行,并设有审查检查点时使用
190 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- PabloBuilder/AgenticAxelortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BrightGold70/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use diagnosing-superpowers, algorand-vulnerability-scanner and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
allanninalSkillalgorand-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Algorand smart contracts for 11 common vulnerabilities including rekeying attacks, unchecked transaction fees, missing field validations, and access control issues. Use when auditing Algorand projects (TEAL/PyTeal). (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
allanninalSkillcairo-vulnerability-scanner
Scans Cairo/StarkNet smart contracts for 6 critical vulnerabilities including felt252 arithmetic overflow, L1-L2 messaging issues, address conversion problems, and signature replay. Use when auditing StarkNet projects. (project, gitignored)
Also in 4 projects that use this
farslabSkillaws-agentic-ai
AWS Bedrock AgentCore comprehensive expert for deploying and managing AI agents at scale. Use when working with any AgentCore service including Gateway, Runtime, Memory, Identity, Code Interpreter, Browser, Observability, Agent Registry, or Evaluations. Covers agent deployment, MCP tool integration, credential management, agent discovery, governance workflows, and automated quality assessment. Essential when user mentions AgentCore, agent runtime, agent registry, agent evaluation, MCP gateway, deploy agent, register MCP server, discover agents, evaluate agent quality, agent credentials, or wants to build, deploy, catalog, or monitor AI agents on AWS.
Also in 3 projects that use this
farslabSkillaws-cdk-development
AWS Cloud Development Kit (CDK) expert for building cloud infrastructure with TypeScript/Python. Use when creating CDK stacks, defining CDK constructs, implementing infrastructure as code, or when the user mentions CDK, CloudFormation, IaC, cdk synth, cdk deploy, or wants to define AWS infrastructure programmatically. Covers CDK app structure, construct patterns, stack composition, and deployment workflows.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from allanninal
- +1 more from farslab
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- shibit-net/xuanji-community★ 90100% same
- GEd520/legados★ 75100% same
- xjxj71/ai-token-usage-statistics★ 1100% same
- sueryue/Claude-Skillls★ 0100% same
Edited · 2
- rzx007/openharness-ts★ 376% same
- rzx007/Vykor★ 376% same
Wrote their own version · 184
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 455same name
174 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- brainstormingSkill
- chinese-code-reviewSkill
- chinese-commit-conventionsSkill
- chinese-documentationSkill
- chinese-git-workflowSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- using-superpowersSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- workflow-runnerSkill
- writing-plansSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
Files
执行计划
概述
加载计划,批判性审查,执行所有任务,完成后报告。
开始时宣布: "我正在使用 executing-plans 技能来实现此计划。"
注意: 告诉你的人类伙伴,Superpowers 在有子代理支持时效果好得多。如果在支持子代理的平台上运行(如 Claude Code 或 Codex),其工作质量会显著提高。如果子代理可用,请使用 superpowers:subagent-driven-development 而非此技能。
流程
步骤 1:加载并审查计划
- 读取计划文件
- 批判性审查——识别计划中的任何问题或疑虑
- 如果有疑虑:在开始之前向你的人类伙伴提出
- 如果没有疑虑:创建 TodoWrite 并继续
审查时重点检查:
- 步骤之间是否有依赖遗漏?(A 依赖 B,但 B 排在 A 之后)
- 验证条件是否明确?("确认可用"不算,"运行
npm test全部通过"才算) - 是否有隐含的环境假设?(Node 版本、数据库连接、API Key)
审查示例:
计划文件:docs/plan.md
任务清单:5 个任务
审查发现:
- 任务 3(添加数据库迁移)应在任务 2(编写数据模型)之后,顺序正确 ✓
- 任务 4 的验证条件写的是"确认功能正常"→ 需澄清:具体跑什么测试?
- 计划未提及 Python 版本要求 → 需确认
向伙伴提出:
"计划整体可执行。有两个问题:(1) 任务 4 的验证条件不够具体,建议改为
'运行 pytest tests/test_api.py 全部通过';(2) 需要确认 Python 版本要求。"步骤 2:执行任务
对于每个任务:
- 标记为进行中 — 更新 TodoWrite
- 理解目标 — 重读任务描述,明确完成标准
- 执行实现 — 严格按照计划步骤执行(计划已有小步骤)
- 运行验证 — 按要求运行测试或检查
- 提交变更 — 每完成一个任务提交一次,commit message 引用任务编号
- 标记为已完成 — 更新 TodoWrite
每个任务的节奏:
--- 任务 2/5:添加用户验证 ---
[标记进行中]
目标:为 /api/users 添加输入验证
完成标准:所有验证测试通过,无效输入返回 400
[实现]
- 添加 validateUser() 中间件
- 编写 3 个验证规则(email 格式、密码强度、用户名长度)
[验证]
$ npm test -- --grep "validation"
✓ 拒绝无效 email (12ms)
✓ 拒绝弱密码 (8ms)
✓ 拒绝过长用户名 (5ms)
3 passing
[提交]
$ git add src/middleware/validate.js tests/validation.test.js
$ git commit -m "feat: 添加用户输入验证(任务 2/5)"
[标记完成]
--- 任务 2/5 完成 ---批量审查检查点:
- 每完成 3 个任务后,暂停回顾:整体方向还对吗?有没有偏离计划?
- 如果发现前面的实现有问题,先修复再继续,不要带着问题往下走
步骤 3:处理常见异常
测试失败:
- 读错误信息,定位失败原因
- 区分:是实现 bug?还是测试本身有问题?还是计划描述有误?
- 实现 bug → 修复并重跑
- 测试有问题 → 修复测试,向伙伴说明
- 计划有误 → 停下来,向伙伴报告并建议修正
依赖缺失:
任务 3 需要 Redis 连接,但计划中没有提及 Redis 配置。
→ 停止执行
→ 向伙伴报告:"任务 3 需要 Redis,计划中未包含配置步骤。
建议:在任务 3 前插入 '配置 Redis 连接' 步骤。"指令不清:
- 不要猜测意图,不要"合理推断"
- 列出你的理解和困惑,让伙伴澄清
- 等待回复后再继续
步骤 4:完成开发
所有任务完成并验证后:
- 宣布:"我正在使用 finishing-a-development-branch 技能来完成此工作。"
- 必需子技能: 使用 superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- 按照该技能的指引验证测试、展示选项、执行选择
完成报告模板:
## 执行报告
**计划:** docs/plan.md
**分支:** feature/user-validation
**任务:** 5/5 已完成
### 完成的任务
1. ✅ 初始化项目结构
2. ✅ 添加用户验证
3. ✅ 添加数据库迁移
4. ✅ 实现 API 端点
5. ✅ 添加集成测试
### 验证结果
- 单元测试:23/23 通过
- 集成测试:8/8 通过
- lint 检查:0 个警告
### 偏离计划的地方
- 任务 3:Redis 配置从 env 改为 config.yaml(经伙伴同意)
### 下一步
按 finishing-a-development-branch 技能处理合并/PR何时停下来求助
在以下情况立即停止执行:
- 遇到阻塞(缺少依赖、测试失败、指令不清)
- 计划有严重缺陷导致无法开始
- 你不理解某条指令
- 验证反复失败(同一测试失败 2 次以上)
不确定时就问,不要猜测。
何时回到之前的步骤
回到审查(步骤 1)当:
- 伙伴根据你的反馈更新了计划
- 根本性的方案需要重新考虑
不要硬闯阻塞 — 停下来问。
注意事项
- 先批判性审查计划
- 严格按照计划步骤执行
- 不要跳过验证
- 每个任务单独提交,commit message 引用任务编号
- 计划要求时引用相应技能
- 遇到阻塞时停下来,不要猜测
- 未经用户明确同意,绝不在 main/master 分支上开始实现
集成
必需的工作流技能:
- superpowers:using-git-worktrees - 必需:开始前建立隔离的工作空间
- superpowers:writing-plans - 创建此技能要执行的计划
- superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch - 所有任务完成后收尾开发
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

