agentleFS
LeadMagicLeadMagic/leadmagic-skills/skills/outbound-recipes/SKILL.md

outbound-recipes

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Composable LeadMagic recipes for building outbound systems — ICP list building, waterfall enrichment, bulk CSV pipelines, hiring-intent trigger sweeps, job-change champion tracking, competitor ad monitoring, lookalike expansion, TAM mapping, and list hygiene. Use when designing or running any multi-step outbound, prospecting, or GTM data workflow with LeadMagic.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Cheapest-first: never run a pricier product when a cheaper one satisfies the channel (leadmagic skill has the ladder).

    line 42
  2. Very specific:

    Close the loop: after a run, report actuals from free /v1/analytics/day/{date} vs the estimate.

    line 45
  3. Distinctive:

    Never invent emails, phones, funding, ads, or job data.

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

LeadMagic — Outbound system recipes

Thirteen credit-aware, composable recipes live in the leadmagic skill's references — read skills/leadmagic/references/outbound-recipes.md for full request bodies and cost models. This skill is the index and the operating rules.

Recipe index

#RecipeCore endpointsCost model
1ICP list build/v3/search/stats (free) → /v3/people/search1/row (free on Pro/Ultimate)
2Account briefcompany-search + funding + tech + public jobs research~8–12/account
3Waterfall contact enrichmentvalidate → find → profile→email → personal → mobile0.25–5, cheapest-first
4Bulk CSV enrichment/bulk/validate → /bulk/submit → poll → downloadper successful row
5List hygienebulk email_validation before every send0.25/row max
6Hiring-intent trigger sweep/v3/jobs/search + evidence reviewplan-dependent
7Decision-maker mappingrole-finder first; /v3/people/employees only for exploratory lists2–6/account
8Job-change champion loopjob-change-detector → profile → email-finder3/contact/sweep
9Competitor ads monitorgoogle/meta/b2b ads search → details1/search + 2/detail
10Lookalike expansion/v3/companies/lookalike → filter → rank5/seed + 1/row
11TAM mapfree stats permutations → selective reveal~0 to size
12Speed-to-lead inbound enrichvalidation + company-search + role-finder~2–4/lead
13Signal-stacked cold sequencecomposes 2/3/5/6/7/8/9/10budgeted per stage

Operating rules (every recipe)

  1. Preflight free: GET /v1/credits; preview with POST /v1/batch/preview-cost when ≥ 500 credits; state projected spend before running.
  2. Plan-aware sizing: on Basic–Growth, size searches with free stats endpoints first; on Professional/Ultimate, v3 searches are credit-free within 5/10 req/s.
  3. Cheapest-first: never run a pricier product when a cheaper one satisfies the channel (leadmagic skill has the ladder).
  4. Bulk ≥ 50 rows. Poll ≥45s. Misses are free — retry only changed inputs.
  5. Hygiene before send (recipe 5) — always.
  6. Close the loop: after a run, report actuals from free /v1/analytics/day/{date} vs the estimate.
  7. Never invent emails, phones, funding, ads, or job data; only report endpoint results.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.