agentleFS
LIDR-academyLIDR-academy/AI4Devs-LTI-extended/.cursor/skills/openspec-bulk-archive-change/SKILL.md

openspec-bulk-archive-change

Skill278 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Archive multiple completed changes at once. Use when archiving several parallel changes.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 16 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 16

    Common

    Most of the 49 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run openspec list --json to get all active changes.

    line 22
  2. Common:

    If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.

    line 24
  3. Common:

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes:

    line 28
  4. Common:

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.

    line 33
  5. Common:

    If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"

    line 45
  6. Common:

    Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec

    line 69
  7. Common:

    Check for related files, functions, or tests

    line 70
  8. Common:

    If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs

    line 73
  9. Common:

    If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)

    line 74
  10. Common:

    If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user

    line 75
  11. Common:

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation:

    line 109
  12. Common:

    If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.

    line 117
  13. Common:

    Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)

    line 124
  14. Common:

    Always prompt for selection, never auto-select

    line 237
  15. Common:

    When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order

    line 239
  16. Common:

    Use single confirmation for entire batch

    line 242
  17. Common:

    If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others

    line 246

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 49 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.

This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.

Input: None required (prompts for selection)

Steps

  1. Get active changes

    Run openspec list --json to get all active changes.

    If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.

  2. Prompt for change selection

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with multi-select to let user choose changes:

    • Show each change with its schema
    • Include an option for "All changes"
    • Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)

    IMPORTANT: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.

  3. Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes

    For each selected change, collect:

    a. Artifact status - Run openspec status --change "<name>" --json

    • Parse schemaName and artifacts list
    • Note which artifacts are done vs other states

    b. Task completion - Read openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md

    • Count - [ ] (incomplete) vs - [x] (complete)
    • If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"

    c. Delta specs - Check openspec/changes/<name>/specs/ directory

    • List which capability specs exist
    • For each, extract requirement names (lines matching ### Requirement: <name>)
  4. Detect spec conflicts

    Build a map of capability -> [changes that touch it]:

    auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
    api  -> [change-c]            <- OK (only 1 change)

    A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.

  5. Resolve conflicts agentically

    For each conflict, investigate the codebase:

    a. Read the delta specs from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify

    b. Search the codebase for implementation evidence:

    • Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
    • Check for related files, functions, or tests

    c. Determine resolution:

    • If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
    • If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
    • If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user

    d. Record resolution for each conflict:

    • Which change's specs to apply
    • In what order (if both)
    • Rationale (what was found in codebase)
  6. Show consolidated status table

    Display a table summarizing all changes:

    | Change              | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
    |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
    | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
    | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | auth (!)  | Ready* |
    | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |

    For conflicts, show the resolution:

    * Conflict resolution:
      - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)

    For incomplete changes, show warnings:

    Warnings:
    - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
  7. Confirm batch operation

    Use AskUserQuestion tool with a single confirmation:

    • "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
    • Options might include:
      • "Archive all N changes"
      • "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
      • "Cancel"

    If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.

  8. Execute archive for each confirmed change

    Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):

    a. Sync specs if delta specs exist:

    • Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
    • For conflicts, apply in resolved order
    • Track if sync was done

    b. Perform the archive:

    mkdir -p openspec/changes/archive
    mv openspec/changes/<name> openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>

    c. Track outcome for each change:

    • Success: archived successfully
    • Failed: error during archive (record error)
    • Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
  9. Display summary

    Show final results:

    ## Bulk Archive Complete
    
    Archived 3 changes:
    - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
    - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
    - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
    
    Skipped 1 change:
    - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
    
    Spec sync summary:
    - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
    - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order)

    If any failures:

    Failed 1 change:
    - some-change: Archive directory already exists

Conflict Resolution Examples

Example 1: Only one implemented

Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]

Checking add-oauth:
- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow

Checking add-jwt:
- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found

Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.

Example 2: Both implemented

Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]

Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts

Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts

Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).

Output On Success

## Bulk Archive Complete

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/

Spec sync summary:
- N delta specs synced to main specs
- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)

Output On Partial Success

## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)

Archived N changes:
- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/

Skipped M changes:
- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)

Failed K changes:
- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists

Output When No Changes

## No Changes to Archive

No active changes found. Create a new change to get started.

Guardrails

  • Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
  • Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
  • Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
  • When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
  • Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
  • Show clear per-change status before confirming
  • Use single confirmation for entire batch
  • Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
  • Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
  • Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
  • If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.