openspec-continue-change
Skill278 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Continue working on an OpenSpec change by creating the next artifact. Use when the user wants to progress their change, create the next artifact, or continue their workflow.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
32 rules. 13 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
13
Common
Most of the 63 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context.
- Very specific: line 24
Use getAccessibleAtlassianResources MCP tool to get the cloudId
- Very specific: line 25
Use getJiraIssue MCP tool with:
- Distinctive: line 32
Remove any leading/trailing hyphens
- Distinctive: line 34
If ticket title is unclear or too long, use a shortened meaningful version
- Distinctive: line 36
If no change exists, ask user if they want to create one or use an existing change
- Distinctive: line 37
Use ticket content as context for creating the next artifact
- Very specific: line 42
Run openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified.
- Common: line 52
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change.
- Very specific: line 89
CRITICAL for tasks artifact: If creating tasks.md:
- Very specific: line 90
Read openspec/config.yaml to get backend-specific rules (mandatory steps, branch naming, etc.)
- Very specific: line 91
Read .claude/rules/openspec-tasks-mandatory-steps.mdc to understand mandatory testing requirements and agent execution responsibilities
- Distinctive: line 93
All mandatory steps that MUST be included (e.g., Step 0: Create Feature Branch)
- Distinctive: line 94
If Jira ticket was provided: Use ticket content to inform artifact creation
- Common: line 95
Read any completed dependency files for context
- Very specific: line 96
Use template as the structure - fill in its sections
- Very specific: line 98
For tasks artifact: Ensure all mandatory steps from config.yaml and the rule file are included:
- Distinctive: line 101
Run Unit Tests and Verify Database State (MANDATORY)
- Distinctive: line 104
Update Technical Documentation (MANDATORY)
- Common: line 106
Write to the output path specified in instructions
- Common: line 108
STOP after creating ONE artifact
- Common: line 123
After each invocation, show:
- Common: line 137
proposal.md: Ask user about the change if not clear.
- Common: line 140
design.md: Document technical decisions, architecture, and implementation approach.
- Common: line 146
Create ONE artifact per invocation
- Common: line 147
Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- Common: line 148
Never skip artifacts or create out of order
- Very specific: line 149
For tasks.md: Read .claude/rules/openspec-tasks-mandatory-steps.mdc to ensure all mandatory steps are included with proper agent execution …
- Common: line 150
If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
- Common: line 151
Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
- Common: line 152
Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
- Very specific: line 154
Do NOT copy <context>, <rules>, <project_context> blocks into the artifact
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 63 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
Input: Optionally specify:
- A Jira ticket ID (e.g.,
SCRUM-123) - will fetch ticket content and find/create associated change - A change name - will use that change directly
- If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
Determine input and get context
a. If input looks like a Jira ticket ID (matches pattern like
SCRUM-123,PROJ-456, etc.):- Use
getAccessibleAtlassianResourcesMCP tool to get the cloudId - Use
getJiraIssueMCP tool with:cloudId: from step aboveissueIdOrKey: the provided ticket ID
- Extract ticket content (title, description, acceptance criteria, etc.)
- Derive a kebab-case change name from the ticket title:
- Convert ticket title to lowercase
- Replace spaces and special characters with hyphens
- Remove any leading/trailing hyphens
- Example: "Update Position API" →
update-position-api, "Add User Auth" →add-user-auth - If ticket title is unclear or too long, use a shortened meaningful version
- Try to find existing change with the derived kebab-case name
- If no change exists, ask user if they want to create one or use an existing change
- Use ticket content as context for creating the next artifact
b. If input is a change name or no input provided:
- Proceed with existing logic (prompt for selection if needed)
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select which change to work on.Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from
schemafield if present, otherwise "spec-driven") - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModifiedfield)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
- Use
- Check current status
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonschemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")isComplete: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
Act based on status:
If all artifacts are complete (
isComplete: true):- Congratulate the user
- Show final status including the schema used
- Suggest: "All artifacts created! You can now implement this change or archive it."
- STOP
If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with
status: "ready"):- Pick the FIRST artifact with
status: "ready"from the status output - Get its instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidanceoutputPath: Where to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Create the artifact file:
- CRITICAL for tasks artifact: If creating
tasks.md:- Read
openspec/config.yamlto get backend-specific rules (mandatory steps, branch naming, etc.) - Read
.claude/rules/openspec-tasks-mandatory-steps.mdcto understand mandatory testing requirements and agent execution responsibilities - Task structure requirements
- All mandatory steps that MUST be included (e.g., Step 0: Create Feature Branch)
- Read
- If Jira ticket was provided: Use ticket content to inform artifact creation
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Use
templateas the structure - fill in its sections - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file - For tasks artifact: Ensure all mandatory steps from
config.yamland the rule file are included:- Step 0: Create Feature Branch (MUST be first step for backend changes)
- Review and Update Existing Unit Tests (MANDATORY)
- Run Unit Tests and Verify Database State (MANDATORY)
- Manual Endpoint Testing with curl (MANDATORY - AGENT MUST EXECUTE)
- E2E Testing with Playwright MCP (MANDATORY if applicable - AGENT MUST EXECUTE)
- Update Technical Documentation (MANDATORY)
- For manual testing tasks: Include sub-tasks that make it clear the agent must execute tests (e.g., "Test GET endpoints with curl", "Restore database state", etc.)
- Write to the output path specified in instructions
- CRITICAL for tasks artifact: If creating
- Show what was created and what's now unlocked
- STOP after creating ONE artifact
If no artifacts are ready (all blocked):
- This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
- Show status and suggest checking for issues
- After creating an artifact, show progress
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifact was created
- Schema workflow being used
- Current progress (N/M complete)
- What artifacts are now unlocked
- Prompt: "Want to continue? Just ask me to continue or tell me what to do next."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. Use the instruction field from the instructions output to understand what to create.
Common artifact patterns:
spec-driven schema (proposal → specs → design → tasks):
- proposal.md: Ask user about the change if not clear. Fill in Why, What Changes, Capabilities, Impact.
- The Capabilities section is critical - each capability listed will need a spec file.
- specs/*.md: Create one spec per capability listed in the proposal.
- design.md: Document technical decisions, architecture, and implementation approach.
- tasks.md: Break down implementation into checkboxed tasks.
For other schemas, follow the instruction field from the CLI output.
Guardrails
- Create ONE artifact per invocation
- Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- Never skip artifacts or create out of order
- For tasks.md: Read
.claude/rules/openspec-tasks-mandatory-steps.mdcto ensure all mandatory steps are included with proper agent execution requirements - If context is unclear, ask the user before creating
- Verify the artifact file exists after writing before marking progress
- Use the schema's artifact sequence, don't assume specific artifact names
- IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Other versions65 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 61
- Fission-AI/OpenSpec★ 74k27% same
- alibaba/druid★ 28k92% same
- PBH-BTN/PeerBanHelper★ 6.3k88% same
- fengshao1227/ccg-workflow★ 5.9k92% same
- Soju06/codex-lb★ 3.3k92% same
- Draculabo/AntigravityManager★ 2.4k92% same
- microsoft/rayfin★ 64690% same
- mckinsey/agents-at-scale-ark★ 42993% same
- atilladeniz/Kubeli★ 38792% same
- kalbasit/ncps★ 34585% same
51 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 4
- studyzy/imewlconverter★ 10ksame name
- studyzy/OpenSpec-cn★ 1.2ksame name
- charliehzm/medharness★ 85same name
- redhat-developer/rhdh-skills★ 19same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use draft-openspec-docs, release-openspec and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
studyzySkilldraft-openspec-docs
OpenSpec 文档的协作式页面起草模式。在目标页面内部构建一份草稿计划(目的、结构、编号起草步骤),与用户一起迭代,然后按已批准的步骤逐章节起草,并在完成后清理自身。在页面需要从头重写,或一个新区块需要用户参与塑形时使用。
Also in 3 projects that use this
studyzySkillrelease-openspec
Use this skill when releasing OpenSpec: audit merged work and changeset coverage, decide whether a catch-up changeset PR is needed, prepare or resume the Changesets Version Packages PR, cut a beta or stable release, verify publishing, and polish GitHub release notes. Also use when asked whether an open release PR is complete, what the next release step is, or to continue a release paused for human approval.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillopenspec-update-change
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.
Also in 13 projects that use this
VercelSkillvercel-react-best-practices
React and Next.js performance optimization guidelines from Vercel Engineering. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React/Next.js code to ensure optimal performance patterns. Triggers on tasks involving React components, Next.js pages, data fetching, bundle optimization, or performance improvements.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrelease
Use ONLY when the user explicitly asks to cut/publish a Huabu desktop release or tag a version. Performs an outward action — bumps the version in apps/desktop/package.json, commits + annotated-tags vX.Y.Z, and pushes the branch + tag. That tag push auto-builds the macOS/Windows installers and publishes a GitHub Release. Provides `status`, `bump`, `tag-push`, and a one-command `run` (bump → tag-push).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from studyzy
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/codegraph.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/use-base-rules.mdcCursor rule
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-onboardSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-onboardSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

