agentleFS
KotrotsosKotrotsos/claude-skills-non-coding/weekly-review/SKILL.md

weekly-review

Skill8 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use this skill on Fridays or end-of-week to produce a personal weekly review covering what got done, what slipped, what to carry, what to kill, and who needs follow-up. Triggers on phrases like "weekly review", "Friday review", "wrap up the week", or when the user references their Friday wrap-up practice. Removes the first-paragraph problem that kills most weekly review practices.

92 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use quarterly-review, daily-plan and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Phoenixrr2113Skill

    quarterly-review

    Quarterly review — strategic look at the last 3 months. Career trajectory, project health, life balance, big decisions ahead. Runs 1st of Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • steptianSkill

    daily-plan

    每日待办计划与日程管理。触发词:'今天要做'、'今日计划'、'今日待办'、'今天安排'、'安排一下'、'加个任务'、'记个任务'、'今日复盘'、'今日回顾'、'今天总结'、'本周计划'、'周总结'、'开始工作'、'上班了'、'完成了'、'加个日程'、'记个日程'、'改一下时间'、'日程调整'、'面试'、'开会'、'约了'。支持四象限优先级、时段分配、固定日程管理、智能时间估算、每日/每周复盘。当用户提到有明确时间的安排(如'下午两点面试'、'10点开会'),自动识别为日程并写入日程表。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • seedprodSkill

    daily-brief

    Send a morning briefing via Telegram with weather, news, and a motivational quote. Designed to run via launchd for automated daily delivery.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • claude-office-skillsSkill

    meeting-notes

    >

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Phoenixrr2113Skill

    morning-brief

    Full morning brief — calendar, email, meeting prep, execute actionable items, create follow-up tasks. Runs at 8:03 AM or when Randy asks for a morning update.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • zephyrwang6Skill

    daily-review

    每日工作回顾与洞察分析,对用户前一天的对话历史和使用数据进行总结与建议

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 80 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Does not write a performance self-evaluation (different purpose)

    line 70
  2. Distinctive:

    Does not produce a status report for managers (different audience)

    line 71
  3. Distinctive:

    Does not generate goals or OKRs (separate planning practice)

    line 72
  4. Distinctive:

    Does not predict next week's outcomes (review is retrospective only)

    line 73

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 80 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Personal Weekly Review

When to use this skill

It is Friday afternoon, or whenever the user does their weekly close. Most knowledge workers know they should do a weekly review. Most stop after three weeks because starting from a blank page on Friday afternoon is too hard. This skill removes the first-paragraph problem by drafting the review from the week's actual data.

Input the user provides

  • The week's calendar entries (or pointers to them)
  • Completed tasks if logged in a system
  • Meeting notes from the week
  • Slack threads or emails representing major conversations
  • Optionally: open commitments from the prior week's review

What this skill does

  1. Reads through the week's data
  2. Identifies what got done vs. what was planned
  3. Surfaces what got dropped, slipped, or actively killed
  4. Flags follow-ups the user owes to specific people
  5. Suggests what to carry into next week vs. what to drop
  6. Produces a 200-300 word review in the user's voice, ready to file or send to a chief of staff

Output structure

# Week of [date range]

## What got done
- [Concrete deliverable 1]
- [Concrete deliverable 2]
- [Concrete deliverable 3]
- [Meeting / decision that mattered]

## What slipped
- [Planned thing that did not happen, with one-sentence reason]
- [Thing that got partially done]

## What I am carrying into next week
- [Specific commitment with deadline]
- [Specific commitment]

## What I am killing
- [Item being formally dropped, with rationale]

## Follow-ups I owe
- [Name]: [what I promised, by when]
- [Name]: [same]
- [Name]: [same]

## One thing I noticed
[Single observation about the week worth keeping. Not a lesson, not a moral. A noticing.]

Calibration notes

  • 200-300 words total. Longer reviews do not get written.
  • The "What I am killing" section is the most important and the most skipped. Force it. If nothing is being killed, the user is accumulating commitments and will burn out.
  • The "Follow-ups I owe" section is where this skill earns its keep operationally. Most weekly slips happen because the user forgot they promised someone something. Surface these explicitly.
  • The "One thing I noticed" is not a takeaway. It is a small observation. Examples: "Three meetings this week were about onboarding." "The decision on vendor X has been deferred four times." "I keep saying yes to coffee chats that do not move work forward." This section gives the review value beyond task accounting.
  • Voice should match the user's. Short. Direct. No moralizing. The review is for the user, not for performance.

What this skill does NOT do

  • Does not write a performance self-evaluation (different purpose)
  • Does not produce a status report for managers (different audience)
  • Does not generate goals or OKRs (separate planning practice)
  • Does not predict next week's outcomes (review is retrospective only)

When NOT to use this skill

  • Week with major disruption (illness, family event, etc.) where normal cadence does not apply
  • Vacation week (use a separate "return to work" prep instead)
  • First week in a new role (use an onboarding journal instead)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.