agentleFS
KohulanKohulan/orthonym-skills/skills/kickoff/SKILL.md

kickoff

Skill2 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub

Starts or resumes a chemistry-dev work session by self-priming from the project's handoff note, durable notes and git, with a drift check against the roadmap before the next task begins, in place of a hand-written resume prompt. Use at session start when no task has been given yet. Triggers on "continue", "resume", "kickoff", "where were we", or "pick up from the handoff note". Not for wrapping up a session (use handoff).

31 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use standup, grill and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    standup

    Generate a standup update from recent activity. Use when preparing for daily standup, summarizing yesterday's commits and PRs and ticket moves, formatting work into yesterday/today/blockers, or structuring a few rough notes into a shareable update.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • renatorozasSkill

    grill

    Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    status

    Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Drift check first (cheap agent): Before anything else, spawn a small/cheap subagent (a fast, cheap model is sufficient — this is a …

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    If your project has an authoritative roadmap/plan doc, name it here so the drift-check agent knows where to look, and never let it re-open …

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    If its last commit is not in the log, later commits touch other files, or the tree has unexplained changes, the note is stale: trust git …

    line 61
  4. Distinctive:

    Run it once per milestone.

    line 80

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Session kickoff

Self-prime from durable state instead of asking the user for context. Do all of this before any other action, then proceed with the work. If your project's standing directive is "research and decide", stop to ask only when the next step needs the user: a destructive or irreversible action, a real change of scope, or input only they can give.

Wire this up: substitute your project's actual paths/files for the placeholders below (a handoff note, a roadmap/plan doc, your notes). If any of them don't exist yet, skip that step and fall back to git plus whatever notes do exist.

Steps

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

- [ ] 0 Drift check launched
- [ ] 1 Handoff note read
- [ ] 2 Notes read; recall tool queried once
- [ ] 3 Note matches git log / git status
- [ ] 4 Session invariants applied
- [ ] 5 Drift verdict in; ≤5-line confirmation sent
- [ ] 6 Next task started
  1. Drift check first (cheap agent). Before anything else, spawn a small/cheap subagent (a fast, cheap model is sufficient — this is a read-only check) with the protocol in drift-check.md. Put that file's full path and your roadmap and handoff-note paths in its prompt, because a subagent sees none of this conversation. Let it run in the background while you do steps 1–4, and surface its verdict (PASS / DRIFT / STALE-ANCHOR) in your confirmation. If it reports DRIFT or STALE-ANCHOR, make the one correction it names, re-check that one item, and return to Step 5 only when it passes; start no task until the verdict is in. If your project has an authoritative roadmap/plan doc, name it here so the drift-check agent knows where to look, and never let it re-open a decision your project has explicitly locked. Its anchor check matters most: verify the handoff note against git before trusting it, because every later step builds on the note (step 3 says what to do when it is stale).
  2. Read your project's handoff note (e.g. HANDOFF.md, a "resume" doc, or whatever your project's end-of-session skill writes). It should be the primary state: current milestone/phase, last commit, any gate/benchmark baseline, the next task, and active hazards/lessons.
  3. Read both memory layers, every kickoff.
    • (a) File-based notes — the source of truth: at minimum whatever "start here" note the handoff points at for the current milestone, wherever your project keeps its notes (a memory file, a wiki, a project-notes doc, or similar).
    • (b) A recall tool, if your project has one (a searchable memory of past sessions): query it once for "<current milestone> lessons / refuted premises" before starting the task and read the top hits, and again before any load-bearing decision. The previous session's lessons are written there at handoff, so that is where "have we tried / refuted this?" is answered fastest. Treat each hit as a lead to verify against the notes and git before acting; it never outranks them.
  4. Verify against git: git log -5 --oneline and git status --short.
    • The note's "Last commit" is the last work commit; the commit that adds the note usually follows it. The note is current when every commit after it touches only the note (git log --oneline <last-commit>..HEAD -- . ':!<your-handoff-note>' is empty).
    • If its last commit is not in the log, later commits touch other files, or the tree has unexplained changes, the note is stale: trust git plus your notes, say so in one sentence, and reconstruct state from there.
  5. Apply your project's session invariants (its standing-rules doc, if it has one). They always apply; never wait for the user to restate them.
  6. Confirm in ≤5 lines: milestone/phase, last commit hash, any baseline number, the next task you are about to start — then start it.
  7. Implementation phase next? Hand off into your project's plan→build workflow if it has one (for example a brainstorming skill → a plan-writing skill → a subagent-driven-execution skill). A standing "execute autonomously" directive never overrides a hard stop: a no-regression/fail-closed gate, a protected/gold test set, a locked decision.

Hard limits (they apply from session start)

  • Never run parallel implementers in one working tree. A worktree does not rescue you unless the environment under it is isolated too: an editable install that still points at the main tree makes a worktree edit invisible to the tests. Verify isolation first.
  • Only one full/expensive gate at a time: two runs clobber the same verdict/log file. Run it once per milestone; per change, cheap probes only.
  • Don't poll-wait on background jobs: take the completion notification or one watch-until-done step (see watching-background-jobs).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.