agentleFS
Kashyap-001Kashyap-001/second-brain-template/.agents/skills/spec-creation/SKILL.md

spec-creation

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Spec creation with pattern references, acceptance criteria, and demo scripts. Use when creating implementation specs, defining acceptance criteria, breaking down user stories, or translating business requirements to technical specs. Do NOT use for implementation work -- this is for planning and specification only.

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every spec must include:

    line 67
  2. Distinctive:

    Before writing any spec:

    line 133

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Spec Creation Skill

TEMPLATE: This skill uses YOUR_VALUE tokens. Replace with your project values before use.

Purpose

Guide spec creation with clear acceptance criteria, pattern references for execution agents, and testable success validation commands.

When This Skill Applies

  • Creating implementation specs
  • Breaking down user stories
  • Defining acceptance criteria
  • Adding pattern references for execution
  • Creating demo scripts for validation
  • Translating business requirements to technical specs

Stop-the-Line Conditions

FORBIDDEN Patterns

# FORBIDDEN: Missing acceptance criteria
## Implementation
Just do the thing.

# FORBIDDEN: No pattern reference
## Technical Approach
Build it however you want.

# FORBIDDEN: No success validation
## Done Criteria
Looks good to reviewer.

CORRECT Patterns

# CORRECT: Clear acceptance criteria
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] User can click button -> modal appears
- [ ] Modal shows validation errors for empty fields
- [ ] Successful submission shows success toast

# CORRECT: Pattern reference for execution
## Pattern Reference
- **UI Pattern**: `patterns_library/ui/modal-form.md`
- **API Pattern**: `patterns_library/api/crud-endpoint.md`
- **RLS Pattern**: `patterns_library/security/rls-user-data.md`

# CORRECT: Success validation command
## Success Validation
run your test suite

Spec Template (MANDATORY)

Every spec must include:

# SPEC-TASK-{number}: {Feature Name}

## Summary
{One paragraph describing the feature}

## User Story
As a [user type], I want [goal] so that [benefit].

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Testable criterion 1}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 2}
- [ ] {Testable criterion 3}

## Pattern References
- **UI**: `patterns_library/ui/{pattern}.md`
- **API**: `patterns_library/api/{pattern}.md`
- **Database**: `patterns_library/database/{pattern}.md`
- **Security**: Follow RLS patterns in `docs/database/RLS_IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md`

## Success Validation Command
{validation command}

## Demo Script
1. Navigate to {page}
2. Click {button}
3. Observe {expected behavior}
4. Verify {success indicator}

## Logical Commits
1. `feat(scope): implement data model [TASK-{number}]`
2. `feat(scope): add API endpoint [TASK-{number}]`
3. `feat(scope): create UI component [TASK-{number}]`
4. `test(scope): add unit tests [TASK-{number}]`

Acceptance Criteria Patterns

User Action Criteria

- [ ] User can {action} -> {result}
- [ ] When user {triggers}, system {responds}
- [ ] User receives {feedback} after {action}

Data Criteria

- [ ] Data persists after {action}
- [ ] User can only see their own {data type}
- [ ] {field} validates {constraint}

Error Criteria

- [ ] Invalid input shows {error message}
- [ ] Network failure shows retry option
- [ ] Unauthorized access returns 401

Pattern Discovery for Specs

Before writing any spec:

# Find existing patterns
ls patterns_library/

# Search for similar implementations
grep -r "similar feature" app/ lib/

# Check existing specs for format
ls specs/

Spec Quality Checklist

Before submitting spec:

  • All acceptance criteria are testable (can verify pass/fail)
  • Pattern references point to existing patterns
  • Success validation command is runnable
  • Demo script is step-by-step reproducible
  • Logical commits follow SAFe format
  • Ticket referenced

Output Locations

Output TypeLocation
Impl specsspecs/SPEC-TASK-{number}-{description}.md
Requirementsdocs/agent-outputs/requirements/TASK-*.md
ADRsdocs/adr/ADR-{number}-{description}.md

Evidence for Ticket System

After spec approval:

**BSA Spec Evidence**

**Spec**: specs/SPEC-TASK-{number}-{description}.md
**Status**: Approved by [reviewer]

**Deliverables**:
- [x] Acceptance criteria defined
- [x] Pattern references added
- [x] Demo script created
- [x] Ready for implementation

Authoritative References

  • Spec Template: docs/archive/specs/spec_template.md
  • Pattern Library: patterns_library/README.md
  • Planning Guide: docs/team/PLANNING-AGENT-META-PROMPT.md
  • SAFe Workflow: CONTRIBUTING.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.