safe-workflow
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
SAFe development workflow guidance including branch naming conventions, commit message format, rebase-first workflow, and CI validation. Use when starting work on a Linear ticket, preparing commits, creating branches, writing PR descriptions, or asking about contribution guidelines.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Commits and pushes
2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflowedited, first seen Jul 20, 2026
- adyba/pi-safe-workflowtheir own version, first seen Jul 10, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow★ 40575% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- adyba/pi-safe-workflow★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- brain-syncSkill
- feature-guardianSkill
- feature-restorerSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-advancedSkill
- obsidian-vaultSkill
- security-auditSkill
- session-wrapSkill
- spec-creationSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- vault-prunerSkill
- graphifySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 79
All commits have ticket reference
- Distinctive: line 85
When closing a ticket, attach evidence:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SAFe Workflow Skill
TEMPLATE: This skill uses
TASKas a placeholder. Replace with your project's ticket prefix (e.g.,WOR,PROJ,FEAT).
Purpose
Enforce SAFe-compliant git workflow with standardized branch naming, commit message format, and rebase-first merge strategy.
When This Skill Applies
- Starting work on a ticket
- Creating commits or branches
- Asking about PR workflow or contribution guidelines
- Asking "how should I commit this?"
Branch Naming Convention
Format: TASK-{number}-{short-description}
# Good
TASK-447-create-safe-workflow-skill
TASK-123-fix-login-redirect
# Bad
feature/add-dark-mode (missing ticket number)
john-new-feature (personal naming)Commit Message Format
Format: type(scope): description [TASK-XXX]
| Type | When to Use |
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
docs | Documentation only |
refactor | Code restructuring |
test | Adding or updating tests |
chore | Maintenance, dependencies |
feat(harness): create safe-workflow skill [TASK-447]
fix(auth): resolve login redirect [TASK-57]Rebase-First Workflow
# 1. Start from latest main
git checkout main && git pull origin main
# 2. Create feature branch
git checkout -b TASK-{number}-{description}
# 3. Make commits
git commit -m "type(scope): description [TASK-XXX]"
# 4. Before pushing - rebase
git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main
# 5. Push with force-with-lease
git push --force-with-leasePre-PR Checklist
- Branch name follows convention
- All commits have ticket reference
- Rebased on latest main
- CI passes:
run your test suite
Evidence Template
When closing a ticket, attach evidence:
**Work Evidence**
**Ticket**: TASK-XXX
**Branch**: TASK-XXX-description
**PR**: #NNN
**Commits:**
- type(scope): description
**Validation:**
- CI: PASS
- Tests: X/X passing
- Lint: CleanReference
- CONTRIBUTING.md - Full contributor guide
- AGENTS.md - Development context and agent roles
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

